I think if I went digging, I might still have my old Argus C3 brick. I know I still have the Vitomatic II rangefinder in there, which I always kept loaded with B&W film, probably Tri-X.
You can get film online at Amazon and have developed by mail like the old days. k1000s were great old style cameras ... at one time every professional photographer had at least one in their bag.K1000s (for which no film and developing is available for - to my access anyway)
No need, $70 android stock cameras work fine. I wouldn't know how to load a program anyway and I won't own Apple products.
View attachment 385985View attachment 385989
View attachment 385987
View attachment 385988
View attachment 385990
I used to work for Ricoh (though not in the camera division) who now own Pentax and I'm glad that they decided to keep the brand relevant. If you haven't noticed they just came out with a new film camera. Pretty much a hipster thing, but film, nonetheless. They actually had to ask retired engineers to help them design it.
Occasionally I take one of my old film cameras out and even added a set of polarizing filters to this one.
When I want to take a picture for the sake of the image though, I use my Nikon D850.View attachment 386113
I agree. I've looked at a lot of Ansel Adams landscapes and thought they were okay as far as subject matter and view. His darkroom work was untouchable though. I've known a number of instructors in the past who would wax poetically about how great the Zone system was and then spend hours complicating how to use it.Adams was remarkable in what he could get from a negative. It's a shame his "eye" wasn't on par with his skill in the darkroom.
Oh god yeah. That was my camera for years the K1000. Some idiot dropped it on concrete while taking a picture off of the top of a four story parking garage. It didn't really effect it. I understood why all the old hands called it a workhorse camera. It's got a few dents. I bet it still works even though I haven't had great access to a dark room in a damn long time.We used Pentax back in high school photography class. They were dependable and sturdy enough for use by ignorant 15 year olds.
digital just doesn't look right to me. I don't feel it's wrong. But weirdly the older style seems more organic and real to me some how. Strangely black and white does too so it's a bit weird and illogical.My wife has been into photography sinse the early 90s in high school. She worked as at two of our local newspapers, then worked as an independent when those papers stopped having their staff photographers.
She also worked for ASU when she was a student there....and freelanced for local Phoenix papers.
She has bought a bunch of cameras, lenses and accessories. But now, she uses her Google Pixel phone for 95% of her pictures. She only rarely uses any of her pics professionally these days.
Her opinion is that she can take "as good" or better pictures with her phone, than she can get with her Nikon D???? Or Canon Rebel. And far better than film pictures developed by her in her darkroom.
I disagree.....I love the film pictures much better, there is a difference. Film isn't as sharp or bright, but they are "smoother" in my opinion. It's hard yo explain smooth, but I know it when I see it.
I had a flip phone for years. Then in 2017 we got rid of our computer, so I got a smartphone to access places like this. My family and friends know to call the landline, but clients call my cell phone.......and my 86 year old dad sometimes.strange note. I don't have a smart phone the camera is the only thing I like about them. I don't want access to the internet. I feel like everyone spends too much time on their phones and it seems like people have traded happiness for easy dopamine hits.... But I do have a dumb phone (commonly called flip phone) and after having the same phone for years one day it got an update and strangely it takes good pictures now in a limited way.
The 850's Expeed is what? four generations old. Expeed (Nikon's propriety software) and pixel size means the 850 is old, slow, has acceptable image capability but, is generations behind the curve. Lots of acceptable manufacturers around but, no other onboard processing is even close Expeed.Your Nikon 850 was the last and best full frame Nikon DSLR.
The 850's Expeed is what? four generations old. Expeed (Nikon's propriety software) and pixel size means the 850 is old, slow, has acceptable image capability but, is generations behind the curve. Lots of acceptable manufacturers around but, no other onboard processing is even close Expeed.
The Z9, a mirrorless DSLR is, in my opinion, head and shoulders above the old D850. DSLRs are being left in the dust by the mirrorless cameras available. If "snapshots" are your goal. there are many DSLRs available in various price ranges suitable for such. The latest phone cameras provide exception results. But to compare a D850 to the latest generation of camera bodies... a waste of time and effort.
…and rearrange it all until it was as she liked it, not necessarily how it was. All of Roy Stryker’s kids did it. Memorable photos, but they were being produced to sell government programs, not as an an ethnography or representation of reality. Read up on Stryker’s instructions to the photographers working for him. Hell, Walker Evans would kick the po’ folk out of the houses just so that he could rearrange everything to his liking!The best medium format digital cameras have maybe 100 megapixels. Ansel’s big view cameras had 1,200 megapixel resolution plus, the tonality gradient of film is better.
Ansel Adams, like Picasso, lived until modern times. If he wanted a new Cadillac he took a photograph and sold it. Seriously.
His talent was his eye, and his darkroom skills.
On the other hand, a Dorothea Lange photograph is one because she’d see a broken down car full of pea pickers and walk right over and strike up a conversation.
She would have loved modern cameras.![]()