OMG this guy has issues
- Thread starter nsfisher
- Start date
SmokingPipes.com Updates
Watch for Updates Twice a Week
PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor
Site Sponsors
PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor
PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor
PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor
PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor
- Status
That review was inspiring! After reading it, I went up stairs and asked the wife to make me a sandwich. She said no and I back handed her a good one just like a man should! I turned to walk away from her and she pushed me down the stairs. When I came too, I had 2 broken ribs and discovered she locked me out of the bedroom. I walked outside and saw my african american neighbor and said "Boy, I got a cord of wood that needs cutting, you best get too it or you'll feel the whip!" He kicked my ass and when I got up to go inside, he kicked my ass again. Feeling pretty bad and stressed, I went over to Cicero and asked a hooker to give me a knob shine. She knelt down, bit down and stole my wallet as I reeled from my bobbiting. When I got home, I kicked the kids off the couch and told them to make me that sandwich while I took a bath. They tossed their xbox into the tub with me while I rested. Good times. Good times.
wow haunted.....how long before the arbiters of forum decency descend upon you?
LOL. I say f#$% and I get an earful, with backup!
LOL. I say f#$% and I get an earful, with backup!
LMFAO ModernChigago you're my kinda guy 
Is that so Cyndi, well how about's you & I go over there and teach them that mammaries endow us with a heck of a lot more benefits than testes could ever derive for them in 10 lifetimes. Pfft, pompous, conceited asses who discriminate on the basis of one's appendages should have theirs removed .... under general anaesthetic of course for I am a soul possessed of a gentle nature! Oh and chemically too, not by scalpel, we don't do mess, mwahahahaha.
That review does look like a pathetic attempt at satire. I suppose there is a reason some people make good money writing satire and the rest...don't.
The guy is trying to be witty and failing at it badly,Cyndi...I myself am a huge fan of pipe smokers with breasts
ME TOO!! :lol:
What I'd like to know, though, is why doesn't the owners of the site remove garbage like this.
The breast comment was made in response to someone saying this topic had come and gone on other pipe forums. There's a reason I'm on THIS forum and the reddit forum - period. I have logins to 6 other sites and refuse to go back to all of them. I don't need to educate them because it's not likely they're going to change from being a mean old man circle jerk.
When someone is sexist over her, it's usually unintentional and I barely have to whip out the old Mad Mommy look before things are better. Other places believe that women have no place doing "manly" things. I'm fine with that - when they all die it's going to be just a vast Internet wasteland in their forums.
When someone is sexist over her, it's usually unintentional and I barely have to whip out the old Mad Mommy look before things are better. Other places believe that women have no place doing "manly" things. I'm fine with that - when they all die it's going to be just a vast Internet wasteland in their forums.
Why don't you go make nice in those forums and bring their estate collections back to the real man cave.
cyndi and aussielass;
I truly hope i never do or say anything to make u 2 really mad at me; just thinkin bout it makes me shudder lol
I truly hope i never do or say anything to make u 2 really mad at me; just thinkin bout it makes me shudder lol
I don't smoke 1792 but I do hold open doors for ladies and raise my hat (unless it is raining ).I also do all the sowing in our house. :lol:
A Couple of thoughts, if I may chime into this conversation:
1. Perhaps I am being a bit too pragmatic, but shouldn't a tobacco review tell me something about the taste, texture, quality, etc. of the tobacco? Based on the “review” I have no information as to whether or not 1792 is a tobacco worth trying. Was the reviewer implying that smoking 1792 transforms one into a complete cad, or simply using the tobacco review as a platform for the tasteless rant by a very disturbed individual. Having watched the video posted by Pipe Novelist, concerning a similar rant by this individual with respect to another tobacco, I believe the latter to be true. The fact I find most amazing is that he has a wife and kids. He really does need professional help, and/or his medications adjusted.
2. Some discussion in this forum has alluded to the possibility that the “review” was a poor attempt at sarcasm. The posting by Hauntedmyst focused on the “review” was a fine example of sarcasm, it made me laugh. In contrast, the original “review” appears to be more the twisted rambling of a “sick puppy” looking for negative attention. As such summarily ignoring anything further posted by that reviewer is perhaps the most prudent course of action.
3.The distorted view of history in which his deplorable mindset was status quo, with the founding fathers and others being kindred spirits, the total misinterpretation of Franklin’s writing, and the totally disturbed view of history, gives me cause to wonder if any attempt at educating this individual prevailed
4 “Other forums aren't friendly to pipe smokers with breasts” Cindi, and Aussielass, I am sorry to hear that there are still such chauvinist sexist Neanderthals who believe pipe smoking to be the sole providence of men, and who are likely threatened by anyone that might upset their world view. As far as I can see pipe smoking requires hands to manipulate the tobacco and pipe, lips and breathe to smoke the pipe. (Both men and women possess these). I prefer to think of such Neanderthals as simply idiots, who in an ideal world would be rounded up and shot!
1. Perhaps I am being a bit too pragmatic, but shouldn't a tobacco review tell me something about the taste, texture, quality, etc. of the tobacco? Based on the “review” I have no information as to whether or not 1792 is a tobacco worth trying. Was the reviewer implying that smoking 1792 transforms one into a complete cad, or simply using the tobacco review as a platform for the tasteless rant by a very disturbed individual. Having watched the video posted by Pipe Novelist, concerning a similar rant by this individual with respect to another tobacco, I believe the latter to be true. The fact I find most amazing is that he has a wife and kids. He really does need professional help, and/or his medications adjusted.
2. Some discussion in this forum has alluded to the possibility that the “review” was a poor attempt at sarcasm. The posting by Hauntedmyst focused on the “review” was a fine example of sarcasm, it made me laugh. In contrast, the original “review” appears to be more the twisted rambling of a “sick puppy” looking for negative attention. As such summarily ignoring anything further posted by that reviewer is perhaps the most prudent course of action.
3.The distorted view of history in which his deplorable mindset was status quo, with the founding fathers and others being kindred spirits, the total misinterpretation of Franklin’s writing, and the totally disturbed view of history, gives me cause to wonder if any attempt at educating this individual prevailed
4 “Other forums aren't friendly to pipe smokers with breasts” Cindi, and Aussielass, I am sorry to hear that there are still such chauvinist sexist Neanderthals who believe pipe smoking to be the sole providence of men, and who are likely threatened by anyone that might upset their world view. As far as I can see pipe smoking requires hands to manipulate the tobacco and pipe, lips and breathe to smoke the pipe. (Both men and women possess these). I prefer to think of such Neanderthals as simply idiots, who in an ideal world would be rounded up and shot!
@profar:
Regarding your #3. I mentioned earlier, that the review was emblematic of marxist critical theory whereby the cultural base is deconstructed (historically) and diminished, and contextualized as the source of everything wrong in society. It was a feeble attempt to convert the image of a founding father into an evil, wife beating, oppressive & adulterous scumbag. Perhaps I am giving him too much credit and he was simply channeling his own dad.
Regarding your #3. I mentioned earlier, that the review was emblematic of marxist critical theory whereby the cultural base is deconstructed (historically) and diminished, and contextualized as the source of everything wrong in society. It was a feeble attempt to convert the image of a founding father into an evil, wife beating, oppressive & adulterous scumbag. Perhaps I am giving him too much credit and he was simply channeling his own dad.
Is the fellow who originally wrote the diatribe on 1792 a troll or just a sarcastic someone? Don't know, don't care, but I love 1792 and pipe smokers with breasts!
Thanks for posting the Ben Franklin letter; it's great reading, and still makes perfect sense, even after all these years.
Thanks for posting the Ben Franklin letter; it's great reading, and still makes perfect sense, even after all these years.
- Status