Oh Mah Gaahd... Yet Another Review Of GH Rum Twist

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

New Cigars
12 Fresh AKB Meerschaum Pipes
12 Fresh Estate Pipes
3 Fresh Askwith Pipes
2 Fresh Sabina Santos Pipes

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

MisterBadger

Part of the Furniture Now
Oct 6, 2024
987
8,105
Ludlow, UK
Recent appreciations of Gawith & Hoggarth's Rum Twist, and vehement disagreements thereon in this forum, have prompted me to see for myself what all the fuss is about.

Some say that the newer batches can't hold a match to the wonder that GH Rum Twist used to be in years gone by, and I wouldn't know about that. I am generally not a fan of aromatics (I mean, if you like smoking tobacco, why on earth do you want to make it taste like anything else?), and have in the past said some highly uncomplimentary things about the 1792 flake (which I stand by), yet others love it: that's always a problem with tobacco reviews: they are essentially subjective. Their usefulness is, I think, in looking at the strengths, flavours and aromas that please some (as well as the behaviour of the tobacco itself) and, if there seems to be a consensus that agrees with your taste, then you go ahead and buy and try some.

My first experience of a GH blend (1792) was so negative, it might have deterred me from ever trying any more - but last year my secret Santa generously bestowed upon me an inch or so of well-aged Black Irish XX Twist, and I absolutely loved it. So I bought some more GH twists to add to my weed-hoard.

For this trial I selected a neutral, sweet-smoking, small-bowled billiard briar from the Colossus Pipe Factory, sliced off a half inch of the Rum Twist, shredded it finely and - noticing how moist it was - left it out to dry for 4-5 hours, and it could reasonably have done with a little more.

Neither the rope nor the cut tobacco evinced to me any olfactory trace of the rum casing, which leaves me wondering how it compares with its cousin the non-aromatic Brown XX Twist. However, I did catch just a hint of molasses and this too came through when I lit up.

I was surprised when the char-light lasted a whole quarter bowl; after that, the moisture level increased and it needed progressively more relights and nursing with the pipe tool - but still not enough to be frustrating. A powerful nicotine-hit announced itself straight off, after just a couple or three puffs.

Lots of lovely blue smoke and bold, cigar-like aroma from the start. No taste of rum whatever, but the bright and dark Virginia notes were individually detectable. Half a bowl down and it was reminding me of Tabac Manil Le Semois - which I assume was the Burley content, which gave some pleasing depth and body to the Virginias.

Big, round, mellow and no bite or harshness if you keep a gentle but persistent cadence. I was relieved that I didn't experience anything like an electrical fire, or over-barbecued beef taste, that some have. Nonetheless, it was a substantial meal of a smoke, even a 20 minutes' worth in this dinky little pipe, and in its substantiality (though not its taste, which was pure tobacco), it did remind me of a well-grilled steak and onion doorstep sandwich. In fact, I think it would pair well with one of those and a pint of porter - so next time...

It behaved well and burned right down to a fine ash, with no dottle, and despite the fact that, writing this half an hour after tapping out the bowl, still a little stoned and with a very slowly fading grin on my face, it left me wanting more.

Gawith Hoggarth Rum Twist is a fine, mellow, powerful, high quality smoke. Even not knowing what the older issues were like, I cannot understand how anyone can call this characterless or monotonous or one-dimensional. But personal tastes can change without one noticing over time, and in the human psyche the past is more often than not a distant, foreign country bathed in a golden glow the like of which, as the satirist Flann O'Brien once wrote, (1) will not ever be seen again.

I tell you what, though: if this stuff ever does cease to exist, the like of it will not be seen again.

(1) An Béal Bocht (The Poor Mouth) is a 1941 novel in Irish by Flann O'Brien, published under the pseudonym "Myles na gCopaleen".It is regarded as one of the most important Irish-language novels of the twentieth century. An English translation by Patrick C. Power appeared in 1973. If you like Irish humour, get a copy.
 

Whenry

Might Stick Around
Dec 15, 2021
62
156
Gawith Hoggarth Rum Twist is a fine, mellow, powerful, high quality smoke. Even not knowing what the older issues were like, I cannot understand how anyone can call this characterless or monotonous or one-dimensional. But personal tastes can change without one noticing over time, and in the human psyche the past is more often than not a distant, foreign country bathed in a golden glow the like of which, as the satirist Flann O'Brien once wrote, (1) will not ever be seen again.
Well, it’s clear as day we ain’t ever gonna see eye to eye, but I’ll give you this—you ain’t lazy. Least you had the spine to put your own thoughts down in a review instead of just barkin’ at mine. I can respect that, even if I don’t agree with a damn word of it.
 

MisterBadger

Part of the Furniture Now
Oct 6, 2024
987
8,105
Ludlow, UK
Well, it’s clear as day we ain’t ever gonna see eye to eye, but I’ll give you this—you ain’t lazy. Least you had the spine to put your own thoughts down in a review instead of just barkin’ at mine. I can respect that, even if I don’t agree with a damn word of it.
You mean, you didn't even get a strong nicotine hit off the new stuff? That, I couldn't believe. Anyway, perhaps we shall now see at least another two dozen reviews when the other commentators on your review are similarly spurred to write their own, indignant at being considered tireurs-au-cul.
 

Whenry

Might Stick Around
Dec 15, 2021
62
156
You mean, you didn't even get a strong nicotine hit off the new stuff? That, I couldn't believe. Anyway, perhaps we shall now see at least another two dozen reviews when the other commentators on your review are similarly spurred to write their own, indignant at being considered tireurs-au-cul.
No, the old version had a bit of nicotine to it, but I wouldn’t go callin’ it strong. Now, this new version I been criticizin’? Hell, it’s got nothin’—might as well be smokin’ air.
 

MisterBadger

Part of the Furniture Now
Oct 6, 2024
987
8,105
Ludlow, UK
No, the old version had a bit of nicotine to it, but I wouldn’t go callin’ it strong. Now, this new version I been criticizin’? Hell, it’s got nothin’—might as well be smokin’ air.
Well, it's the second strongest tobacco I have ever smoked in my life, the strongest being a 'ree twist' from the Sahnish/Arikara Fort Berthold reservation. I'd count Thuoc Lao a close third. And yours, since you esteem Rum Twist little more noticeable than sucking on an empty pipe? What do you call your strongest tobacco?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: VDL_Piper

Whenry

Might Stick Around
Dec 15, 2021
62
156
Well, it's the second strongest tobacco I have ever smoked in my life, the strongest being a 'ree twist' from the Sahnish/Arikara Fort Berthold reservation. I'd count Thuoc Lao a close third. And yours, since you esteem Rum Twist little more noticeable than sucking on an empty pipe? What do you call your strongest tobacco?
For me, pipesmokin’ never gave me that nicotine buzz folks go on about. Read plenty ‘bout it, never felt it myself.

Now, as for the strongest tobacco I’ve had? That’d be the older version of Dark Plug—had some real weight to it. Old Dark Flake Aromatic wasn’t far behind, just a little less intense. But the only time I ever got a real kick from pipe tobacco? That was when I used Dark Bird’s Eye as rollin’ tobacco. Now THAT was a satisfyin’ experience.
 

Sobrbiker

Lifer
Jan 7, 2023
4,600
61,175
Casa Grande, AZ
Well, it’s clear as day we ain’t ever gonna see eye to eye, but I’ll give you this—you ain’t lazy. Least you had the spine to put your own thoughts down in a review instead of just barkin’ at mine. I can respect that, even if I don’t agree with a damn word of it.
This, and @MisterBadger’s first post in the thread are great examples of how subjective tobacco reviews can be, to the extent that many call them useless.
I don’t find them useless, as long as one has a frame of reference. I’m grateful for the forums, because for me this frame of reference has come from paying attention to enough other folks whose tastes seem to align with mine, then I’ll pay more attention to those.
For instance, neither @Whenry nor @MisterBadger have shared experiences that come close to matching my personal experience with the tobaccos mentioned, so I won’t be trying (or not trying) tobaccos based on input from either. It’s not any slight to either member, and there are many other areas of discussion and interest we may agree wholeheartedly on, and that makes them a part of the overall community I appreciate.

Many are entertained by the reviews that are written to highlight the subjective experience, and I do find them entertaining, but aren’t much use to me personally as a guide to what I should spend my limited tobak budget on.

But I inhale and have no taste, so my drivel may mean nuthin’ to y’all😉
 

MisterBadger

Part of the Furniture Now
Oct 6, 2024
987
8,105
Ludlow, UK
This, and @MisterBadger’s first post in the thread are great examples of how subjective tobacco reviews can be, to the extent that many call them useless.
I don’t find them useless, as long as one has a frame of reference. I’m grateful for the forums, because for me this frame of reference has come from paying attention to enough other folks whose tastes seem to align with mine, then I’ll pay more attention to those.
For instance, neither @Whenry nor @MisterBadger have shared experiences that come close to matching my personal experience with the tobaccos mentioned, so I won’t be trying (or not trying) tobaccos based on input from either. It’s not any slight to either member, and there are many other areas of discussion and interest we may agree wholeheartedly on, and that makes them a part of the overall community I appreciate.

Many are entertained by the reviews that are written to highlight the subjective experience, and I do find them entertaining, but aren’t much use to me personally as a guide to what I should spend my limited tobak budget on.

But I inhale and have no taste, so my drivel may mean nuthin’ to y’all😉
I too read tobacco reviews for entertainment as well as potential information. Sometimes I see a WAYST? post which mentions a blend I've never heard of, and I like to understand where the poster's tastes are at, and what these blends consist of. It is good to know things even when not apparently of any immediate use. And some reviews have made me nearly laugh my head off, as when a certain blend was compared to a urinal cake...
 

telescopes

Pipe Dreamer and Star Gazer
Reviews are helpful when they contain the following information: types of tobacco used in the blend, moisture content, style of cut, burn rate, strength, taste notes, genre of blend, maker. If the reviewer adds thoughts about how the mix of tobaccos worked together - this can be useful. What isn’t useful are the reviewers own personal thoughts. Those can be entertaining, yes, but not really useful. I think this is why Jim does such a great job with his reviews. Very much like watching Dragnet.
 

telescopes

Pipe Dreamer and Star Gazer
I too read tobacco reviews for entertainment as well as potential information. Sometimes I see a WAYST? post which mentions a blend I've never heard of, and I like to understand where the poster's tastes are at, and what these blends consist of. It is good to know things even when not apparently of any immediate use. And some reviews have made me nearly laugh my head off, as when a certain blend was compared to a urinal cake...
I find WAYS to be exceptionally useful if one uses it to find patterns. For instance, often you can pick up if the poster is really enjoying the blend. If others indicate they too are enjoying a certain blend and the pattern continues for a while, the blend might be one worth checking out.
 

mortonbriar

Lifer
Oct 25, 2013
2,840
6,225
New Zealand
the like of it will not be seen again.

(1) An Béal Bocht (The Poor Mouth) is a 1941 novel in Irish by Flann O'Brien, published under the pseudonym "Myles na gCopaleen".It is regarded as one of the most important Irish-language novels of the twentieth century. An English translation by Patrick C. Power appeared in 1973. If you like Irish humour, get a copy.
I did get a copy, thank you. It's a good thing I found a copy at the local book exchange for $3 because I do not think the like will ever be there again.

My review:
It is a short book, but it could probably be shorter.

I loved the first few chapters and was laughing very hard. The next day I finished it, but it was a bit of a chore. It reminds me of how I feel about reading Don Quixote, or even The Idiot.

I can see myself opening it up at any page for a chuckle in the future, cheers!