Who says you are paying a premium for a tin? And GH does not agree.l feel paying the premium for a tin should come with the benefit of being able to store it long term. S.G does not seem to agree lol
True, but still: How're These Tins Workin' Out for Ya'? :: General Pipe Smoking Discussion - https://pipesmagazine.com/forums/threads/howre-these-tins-workin-out-for-ya.111183/C&D does.
Many of their blends are specifically made to age. They even have a series dedicated to long term storage. This is why they use the tins they do, and leave some room in the tins so the tobacco can "breathe".
Same with GLP obviously. Several of his tin descriptions suggest years of aging, just like C&D.
I'm assuming he means the premium over bulk tobacco. No reason to be combative. We're simply talking and posing legitimate questions. He was stating an opinion, which is why it started with "I feel".Who says you are paying a premium for a tin? And GH does not agree.
I think a good portion of the market would like tins that hold a seal but they do not want to oblige us. Guess that is why they make mylar lol.I'm assuming he means the premium over bulk tobacco. No reason to be combative. We're simply talking and posing legitimate questions. He was stating an opinion, which is why it started with "I feel".
Oh, it’s endless.how many more times do you need to state this.if people wish to store long term its up to them/there risk!!!
The irony here is that if 1792 were shipped in an unsealed, indeed perforated, manila envelope with no attempt whatsoever to seal it, fifteen years later when you tore it open to smoke it the flakes would still be dripping wet and require another fifteen years of drying time to even stand a chance of being lit with anything less than an oxy-acetylene torch …I had a polar opposite experience. I recently opened Ennerdale, 1792, and Navy flake. All 3 of them very recently shipped from Gawith to Smokingpipes. Huge pain in the rear to open. I've cracked Gawith tins in the past easily with a coin/key. Lifting at the divot in the corner hearing the vacuum hiss. These ones I had to run a bottle opener lengthwise to coax the lid. For the life of me I couldn't get the 1792 to open without bending the lid. Lifting the edge along the divot produced no audible hiss. I won't claim this difficulty is correlated to the seals efficacy though. Tobacco was fresh (as they should be since they're recent shipments) and tastes like they should.
Just opened a brand new tin of 1792 two days ago and had the same experience. I was afraid I was going to bend the pick tool from my tamper because the tin was so hard to open.I had a polar opposite experience. I recently opened Ennerdale, 1792, and Navy flake. All 3 of them very recently shipped from Gawith to Smokingpipes. Huge pain in the rear to open. I've cracked Gawith tins in the past easily with a coin/key. Lifting at the divot in the corner hearing the vacuum hiss. These ones I had to run a bottle opener lengthwise to coax the lid. For the life of me I couldn't get the 1792 to open without bending the lid. Lifting the edge along the divot produced no audible hiss. I won't claim this difficulty is correlated to the seals efficacy though. Tobacco was fresh (as they should be since they're recent shipments) and tastes like they should.
Saying it and tinning tobacco in a tin that will last twenty years are two different things. I'm not positive, but I believe the tins they use were designed for food service,think chip dipC&D does.
Many of their blends are specifically made to age. They even have a series dedicated to long term storage. This is why they use the tins they do, and leave some room in the tins so the tobacco can "breathe".
Same with GLP obviously. Several of his tin descriptions suggest years of aging, just like C&D.
Very well said.@blametony
Option 1. Leave it in TINS. I do this and have never lost one.
Option 2. Seal in food saver bags. I also do this and have never lost one.
Option 3. Like all other tins after you open or if you want to guarantee a good seal, put in jar. This works BUT can condensate for wetter flakes. My St. James does this in the jar, Navy doesn't seem to have a problem. Neither mold as a result.
Option 4. Mylar sealing of tins. I have not done this. Seems like overkill.
We are a better resource than the producers and or makers on this. They have their motives and cellars don't always line up. Plus we nice.
You may very well have never had a problem. However, they can go bad. I've probably seen hundreds of dried out "sealed" tins. From round,square,rectangle and pop tops and of course cutter tops. Seen many 200gram pop top Sobrani tins go bad. So they certainly can go bad seal wise. Will they? That's the million dollar question, but they certainly can, many from the inside out.I smoke ODF daily, last purchase was 2011 I believe, and never had a compromised tin of ODF, but come to think of it, I vacuum sealed most of them in the five pack. But that's only 14 years old. Relatively young for pipe tobacco IMO.Option 1. Leave it in TINS. I do this and have never lost one.
I don't refute the going bad. Just sharing what has worked for me to increase his sample size of info.You may very well have never had a problem. However, they can go bad.
I've vacuum sealed many of my square and rectangle tins, not a bad idea at all.And something someone else has done for consideration, if we are getting uber tech
This has been my experience with recent SG tins.Most of my SG tins pop right off with little force. I just jar them now.
