Fair enough Derrick. I am by no means a fan of taxation, but lets look at the facts. The US national debt is now over $17 trillion - that's right, that's $17,000 billion. The war in Iraq alone ran up a bill of $6 trillion. And this doesn't even include state and municipal debts, which are also astronomically high, particularly in places like California. Just servicing the interest on this debt requires a massive amount of public revenue, let alone paying down the principal.
This has to be paid for in some way. I am afraid to say that high taxes are here to stay and will necessarily get higher. The folks who don't think so have their head in the sand, like the proverbial ostrich. Even if government spending (excluding interest on the national debt, which must be paid) was cut to the bare bones, higher taxes would still be a certainty. People don't like the idea of higher income taxes because it directly impacts them - they much prefer sin taxes because they view it as voluntary. That's why higher sin taxes are, in my view, inevitable; these types of taxes are low-hanging fruit for politicians because they will upset the least number of people.
Clearly allowing people to avoid sales taxes through internet sales is unsustainable in the long run and is, frankly, bad policy. It is causing a hollowing out of the retail sector because it gives out-of-state internet sales operations a massive competitive advantage over local B&Ms (and not just in the area of tobacco, either) and ultimately results in lower state revenues which must be made up for through alternate modes of taxation. If I owned a B&M operation I would be outraged that I have to charge high rates of tax that out-of-state operators do not have to charge. It is very tough to survive in that type of environment.
This has to be paid for in some way. I am afraid to say that high taxes are here to stay and will necessarily get higher. The folks who don't think so have their head in the sand, like the proverbial ostrich. Even if government spending (excluding interest on the national debt, which must be paid) was cut to the bare bones, higher taxes would still be a certainty. People don't like the idea of higher income taxes because it directly impacts them - they much prefer sin taxes because they view it as voluntary. That's why higher sin taxes are, in my view, inevitable; these types of taxes are low-hanging fruit for politicians because they will upset the least number of people.
Clearly allowing people to avoid sales taxes through internet sales is unsustainable in the long run and is, frankly, bad policy. It is causing a hollowing out of the retail sector because it gives out-of-state internet sales operations a massive competitive advantage over local B&Ms (and not just in the area of tobacco, either) and ultimately results in lower state revenues which must be made up for through alternate modes of taxation. If I owned a B&M operation I would be outraged that I have to charge high rates of tax that out-of-state operators do not have to charge. It is very tough to survive in that type of environment.