Great read. Sounds to me that it's a win for everyone... Peterson, Laudisi, STG, and the consumers.
I was so hoping we could put the p-lip argument to bed way back in chapter 583 of the debate, but it looks like we'll have to go another couple hundred rounds... :rofl:OK, pot stirred. Go
Interesting note, Mark talked to me about how the p-lip quality has changed if you look at a recent p-lip vs one from 30-40 years ago the plip has gotten rounder and harder to clench. WHere back years ago you could easily clench them. The supplier of the stems has gotten, lazy or cut corners. It's something that can be fixed because the p-lip and a system pipe are so perfect together, using a fishtail on a system is an abomination!BTW, I wish I could have my non Petersons somehow converted to p-lips...gauntlet picked up...go
You know how every artisan pipe site makes mention of superior engineering to ensure the highest level of smoking perfection, right? Well, it turns out drilling a straight line and smoothing things out doesn’t really involve much engineering. After all today’s artisan pipescan trace a pretty straight line back a good. three hundred years or so.Yeah wow, 120 years of the p-lip. Yeah, prehistoric Professor Pepperwinkle basement physics to shoot smoke upwards away from the tongue. And a design to look fugly. Tradition is a strange thing sometimes. Even the name is odd, Pee-lip.