Cosmic, I assumed it was a typo that was mean to read "dump".
The nearest I've got to smoking the tobacco in it's entirity, is when I've used a Philtpad (which I haven't done for a while). I don't know if it was wholy the chalk absorbing the gunk, or if it was partly due to the reduced depth of tobacco meaning less gunk was produced to start with. Either way, from a tobacco perspective it was a less "wasteful" approach, and I generally consumed everything that was in the bowl.
The reason I stopped using them was occasionally I'd forget or more accurately lose track of the tobacco depth, and try to "relight" the Philtpad itself. Not in any way a pleasant experience, and something that can really ruin a pipe session with an utterly revolting taste.
I might give them another try as I still have a few packs here from when I first started learning to drive a pipe, and see if they improve or impare the bottom end of a bowl, now that I've got some more experience under the belt.
The nearest I've got to smoking the tobacco in it's entirity, is when I've used a Philtpad (which I haven't done for a while). I don't know if it was wholy the chalk absorbing the gunk, or if it was partly due to the reduced depth of tobacco meaning less gunk was produced to start with. Either way, from a tobacco perspective it was a less "wasteful" approach, and I generally consumed everything that was in the bowl.
The reason I stopped using them was occasionally I'd forget or more accurately lose track of the tobacco depth, and try to "relight" the Philtpad itself. Not in any way a pleasant experience, and something that can really ruin a pipe session with an utterly revolting taste.
I might give them another try as I still have a few packs here from when I first started learning to drive a pipe, and see if they improve or impare the bottom end of a bowl, now that I've got some more experience under the belt.