Jim's Updated and Revised SWR Review.

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

36 Fresh AKB Meerschaum Pipes
6 Fresh Savinelli Autograph Pipes
3 Fresh Lasse Skovgaard Pipes
5 Fresh Henri Sorensen Pipes
10 Fresh Mastro Geppetto Pipes

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
65,101
662,818
Original review, 9-14-2012: The sugary burleys are earthy, woody, bready and nutty with a small spice note. The molasses, anise and cocoa toppings are mild to medium, and while they tone down the burleys a little, they also work well together to create a synergistic, very consistent flavor from start to finish. The strength, taste and nic-hit levels are a step past the mild mark. Won't bite or get harsh. The rough notes are minor. It burns at a moderate pace, cool, clean and even. Requires few relights and barely leaves any dampness in the bowl. Packs very easily with a pleasing, short lived after taste and room note. It goes well with any drink you choose. An easy going, all day smoke that doesn't wear out its welcome. Three stars out of four.

2017 additional comment: Recently, I had the opportunity to smoke SWR made in the 1940s, '50s, '60s, '70s, '80s and '90s as well as several pouches in the 2000s. I was struck by the fact that only in the 1940s version was there a difference in taste. Even then, the difference was only that the '40s sample was just a tad deeper in flavor. I find it amazing how consistent the taste is from World War Two until now.

Update 1-7-2025: The decades of consistency have passed. The burleys are different than the old version. They are sharply rougher, moderately floral, a tad less nutty and bready with a mildly higher degree of sugar and spice, and a small sour note not found in the past. The anise and molasses toppings are slightly less obvious. The cocoa is a little more noticeable. What appears to be apple cider vinegar adds a little sour astringency that you can taste and smell on the tobacco. The strength and flavor levels are higher than before, and are a couple of steps past the center of mild to medium. The nic-hit is in that center. Won’t get harsh, but there a light tongue tingle if puffed beyond a moderate rate. Burns a tad warm with a very consistent flavor and a slightly longer after taste than the previous version. The room note is tolerable. Requires few relights, and leaves little dampness in the bowl. An all day smoke. I give it one and half stars rounded up to two, mostly due to the aforementioned negative effect of the apple cider vinegar. The lack of bite prevents a one star rating. The ratings reflect the current production.
©Jim Amash 2025.
 

Snook

Part of the Furniture Now
Oct 2, 2019
512
2,303
Idaho
I still have a small jar of some I bought in 2019 or so. I just smoked some the other day and really enjoyed it, and I was planning on buying more. When would you say the blend underwent these changes?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pappy Coon

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
65,101
662,818
I still have a small jar of some I bought in 2019 or so. I just smoked some the other day and really enjoyed it, and I was planning on buying more. When would you say the blend underwent these changes?
I don't remember the year that production was moved to Denmark, but it was more than two years ago. Maybe three? Hopefully, somebody reading this thread has a more accurate answer than I do.
 

Zamora

Part of the Furniture Now
Mar 15, 2023
751
1,883
Olympia, Washington
I don't remember the year that production was moved to Denmark, but it was more than two years ago. Maybe three? Hopefully, somebody reading this thread has a more accurate answer than I do.
From what people say here the vinegar thing was first noticed last year. Maybe it took a long time to replace all the stock that was made before the move. Somebody asked Leonard about that and he said he'd look into it.
Darn. I still might try it, but I won't get my hopes up. Thanks, Jim.
You can definitely try your luck if you see it at a store, there's a lot of places where it's not a big mover.
 

Snook

Part of the Furniture Now
Oct 2, 2019
512
2,303
Idaho
You can definitely try your luck if you see it at a store, there's a lot of places where it's not a big mover.
Yeah, I was just going to stop at a smoke shop and grab some. Definitely not committing to a can before I try it out!
 

MidTNPiper

Starting to Get Obsessed
Jul 6, 2023
106
1,504
Nashville, TN
Shame, I errantly bought 6x 7oz tubs of the regular. Similiar production date, 2023 I think? Opened the first one and went F no. Oh well…

I alway need something with decent shelf life to live in the non climate controlled barn. I like granger, but don’t love it. May have to try PA next.
 

Mr. Stubb

Lurker
May 14, 2024
14
8
Are any of the codger blends still the same? I recall that there were issues with Carter Hall or Prince Albert when production went elsewhere some years ago.

I did like Duke Albert and Chatham Manor but I think we all know those are no longer options.
 

LeafErikson

Lifer
Dec 7, 2021
2,358
20,846
Oregon
Are any of the codger blends still the same? I recall that there were issues with Carter Hall or Prince Albert when production went elsewhere some years ago.

I did like Duke Albert and Chatham Manor but I think we all know those are no longer options.
Sir Walter Raleigh aromatic seems to have not changed much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Stubb