jiminks Posts Top 18,480!

[anthonyrosenthal74]

Amazing post count, Jim. I may have to dig though my comics to see if I have anything with your art in it. If so, it's going on the shelf by my pipe rack.

 

[oldgeezersmoker]

As I recently returned to pipe smoking after a 15 year sojurn with cigars, I really had no idea of what the more recent blends on the market tasted like. I did find that some old favorite s were still worth smoking, but jiminks reviews here and at TR have been invaluable to me. This is as good a place as any, I suppose, to say thanks!!!!!

 

[JimInks]

Snowhill: love the map, man. Love the post. :D
Toobfreak: I'm a two finger typist. If MSO can type, he'll eventually leave me in the dust.
Anthony and Oldgeezersmoker: many thanks for the kind words.

 

[oldgeezersmoker]

@jiminks, I so respect your views that I am very close to trying Edward G Robertson. Last I tried it in the early 80's it was pretty much all PG, lanolin and preigniters.

 

[oldgeezersmoker]

Robinson, not Robertson.

 

[benpipesmoking]

thats a whole of of forum posts

 

[mso489]

jim's reviews are so complete and succinct, and have such good detail presented in such appropriate order, I feel like I've sampled the blend just reading the review.

 

[toobfreak]

In every case that I have read I've found Jim's critiques of various blends to be always spot on with a laser-like precision.

 

[wyfbane]

He matches my taste profiles as well. I have never gone wrong using his reviews to take a risk on a new tobacco.
Thanks, man!

 

[JimInks]

I thank you fellas for the kind words. I'm always pleased to know my reviews are of help to others, whether it helps them decide to buy or not buy a blend.

 

[gloucesterman]

It would be my observation that few have contributed as much. You can always count on Jim to present his experience in a concise and professional way. On a personal level, Jim and I exchanged notes several years back on tobacco reviews. His approach was both interesting and eye opening. We are quite lucky to have him aboard. Thanks Jim and keep posting.

 

[jackswilling]

I missed this the first time around, but we are blessed to have Mr. Inks here. I use Tobacco Reviews and always look for his reviews. I have read so many that I am able to correlate, with near certitude if I will like a blend. One example, Savinelli 140th Anniversry aka 140°. I would have never ordered it but for your review. It is now my favorite blend. Thank you for putting your heart and soul into this pastime.

 

[JimInks]

Glousterman and Jackswilling: I thank you both for the appreciation. As for Savinelli 140, it's one of my favorites, too.

 

[ashdigger]

Jim, I absolutely agree on 140, it's not something I would even try. But your review had me order some. The order arrived yesterday and I've smoked four bowls. It's as good as you say. Thank you.

 

[jackswilling]

140° is flying under the radar. All Savinelli blends are from Mac Barens except this C & D

Masterpiece. It takes up the most space in my hoard.

Savinelli - Giubileo d'Oro is also another great blend

 

[JimInks]

Thanks again, Ashdigger.
Jackswilling: I haven't tried the Savinelli Giubileo d'Oro. Glad to hear you like it. I should try it some day.

 

[wyfbane]

If we keep this going, this thread will double for his 20k post, as well...
lol

 

[JimInks]

:rofl: