My biggest concern with all this "Climate Change" is every supporting document in favour sights a "MODEL". Now we all know that these models are just glorified spreadsheets that require data and then some sort of extrapolator that arrives at a future number, thus it's subjective. The person putting in the multiplier gets to control the outcomes and who pays the data entry person controls the outcomes. But what about the raw data you say..........well it's now been proven that many of the worlds meteorological services are rounding or manipulating data to suit the narrative (I'll attach a document that highlights how rotten to the core The Australian BOM is and how they are now under scrutiny for manipulating data)
http://www.bom.gov.au/foi/release/FOI30-6147_DocSet_ForRelease_RR.pdf.
The second problem I have is where the data comes from. These weather stations where once located in field surrounded by grass, trees and had open access to the winds that blew on any given day. This is Observatory Hill in Sydney in the early days, This is our largest capital city.
This is now Observatory Hill below
As you can clearly see it is now surrounded by what has become a very large city which has concrete, bitumen, iron and tile roofs and steel buildings. All these new structures contribute to making a heat sink which to everyone but the blindest must surely elevate temperature readings, air quality et al.
Our climate has been changing and will continue to do so and to believe that the data we are being fed is accurate and needs to be believed because it's in a "model" beggars belief. When I was at school we were preparing for a mini ice age which never came, now we are near boiling point and all about to perish like frogs in hot water. They will cite loss of species and changing ecosystems as the litmus test but fail to acknowledge that more species have been lost when the dinosaurs ceased to exist than now.
The amazon is being cleared but what for. I'll tell you what for..............to grow Soya Beans and Corn, one is to satisfy the vegans, the other to satisfy the need for methanol production and the very seeds that are used are proprietary and genetically modified (so once again the corporate giants get fat at the expense of the environment). All this whilst the vegans and the green movement propels itself forward and the very things things they need to make their case compelling are the very things that are driving the destruction of Mother Nature. Solar is the next godsend but have you ever seen the holes in the ground, the diesel that is burnt to transport the ore, the coal that is burnt to refine these raw products, all in the name of arresting climate change.
Lastly the attack on farmers and their products will cause the world to pay a heavy price. There are very few industries that provide primary products. These industries are the only ones that "create" and in this case feed the world.
If Agriculture stopped tomorrow globally these are the stats:
*Perishables like milk, meat, seafood and fresh fruit and vegetables would all be consumed with in 5 days
*Tinned food would all be gone in 15 days
*Staples like rice/wheat/corn/skim milk powder/and dehydrated protein would all run out in 80 odd days
This represents the worlds critical food supply.........80 to 90 days and you're all out of luck. Yet we see the worlds governments hell bent on reducing farming all because of a climate change agenda, you can't eat solar panels.
Rant is over as I could go on for days about how the media and government institutions are pushing us to a precipice and largely the population is blindly staring at their phone and walking over the edge.
Apologies in advance if I piss anyone off for this post.