If they are really concerned about peoples well-being then why are they allowing cannabis to be sold?
Because it’s clearly good for you!If they are really concerned about peoples well-being then why are they allowing cannabis to be sold?
Careful now, you might get labelled as a conspiracy theoristBanning a legally sold, traded, and gifted commodity, because you feel like it is completely ridiculous and straight-up unconstitutional. This is getting out of hand, I feel like Hawaii's Tobacco Ban and Australia's insane Covid Lock Down are testing grounds to see just how far you can push people before they crack. We moved back to the Mainland a while back but all of my wife's family are on Maui. Are you telling me I can't send her uncles Cigars even as gifts? Time to rally and send out those mystery boxes folks.
What should be, and what is, are why we have courts and lawyers. The government will probe every crevice, every crack, every soft spot for an opening to infringe your rights.Think about that for a second, when related to the context of what the 4th Amendment says.
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
1st Class only makes no sense, it’s always been my understanding, that any mail sent through USPS is protected by law.
Read this too, it’s talking in regards to Agriculture, but it’s also my understanding, that it doesn’t matter the contents either, that would then make for any special inclusion or exclusion.
This article simply shows a warrant needed.
True...but unfortunately the courts and lawyers are increasingly ineffective and unreliable when it comes to protecting rights...or due process and the rule of law...or just truth and justice in general.What should be, and what is, are why we have courts and lawyers. The government will probe every crevice, every crack, every soft spot for an opening to infringe your rights.
There have been some significant victories on appeal for Contitutional law cases. And the current SCOTUS decisions have been refreshing.True...but unfortunately the courts and lawyers are increasingly ineffective and unreliable when it comes to protecting rights...or due process and the rule of law...or just truth and justice in general.
And I see no reason to think that trend won't continue on our current trajectory.
To keep populace dumbed down.If they are really concerned about peoples well-being then why are they allowing cannabis to be sold?
You're right, I'm about a 10 bowl a week smoker. Probably way overkill. They say fear of loss is the biggest motivating factor for a sale. I definitely felt it. May have went a little overboard but should have some extra tins to cellar for the next couple years, and will get to experiment with some aged blends. Also gives me some surplus to help out some brothers in Hawaii if need be. Still wish I could of found some SG varieties, everywhere I looked was sold out though..What is your average BPD (bowls per day)? The stash in your picture looks to be about 45-50 1.75/2 oz tins worth of baccy. If you are a bowl a day smoker, that will get you 3 years of smoking, based on my calculations.
Not that I want to give you ANY reason NOT to buy more tobacco to prepare for your own state sanctioned tobaccolypse. Buy away if you've got the money and time. But if for some reason you don't get all that you want and are able to buy some in the lower 48 (or do you call in the upper 48 in Hawai'i?) in the next two years, I'd think you'll make it.
That said, you may want to consider stocking up on GL Pease and Drucquer & Sons, which seem to be rather under-represented among your stash (IMHO).
I don't think it does. The text saysIt prohibits any shipment. I believe the wording is along the lines of, ‘if one knowingly has tobacco products shipped.’ Here is the bill SB975 HD2 - https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2023/bills/SB975_HD2_.HTM
(a) A person or entity commits the offense of unlawful shipment of tobacco products if the person or entity:
(1) Is engaged in the business of selling tobacco products; and
(2) Knowingly ships or causes to be shipped any tobacco products to a person or entity in this State that is not a licensee under this chapter.
Damn, you beat me to this comment... but I will add my 2 cents anyway...I don't think it does. The text says
The "and" at the end of clause (1) implies that both (1) and (2) need to apply for an offense to have been committed.
It didn’t...Well... I feel like I killed the thread!
So basically this whole debacle did nothing except increase the amount of tobacco being sent to Hawai’i. Noice!