And, the photographer's "eye"!
Learning how differently light is handled by software, different than widely variable emulsion films, and digital began to capture images close to Kodachrome 64, I made the switch. The younger generations only "know" digital and love the immediacy of seeing the captured image on the screen.
Two different worlds. Both with their pluses and minuses. Even in "film" days the media varied widely from company to company and, even the offerings from the same company. And, I know of know "film" which could cover the "range" quality glass was able to capture. Some images only "worked" in BW. Others, color. Some planned shots needed a certain speed and emulsion.
Most working photographers carry a phone or other "grab" camera. Also, they work to capture the essence of a scene as they interpret it. Why get irritated over "snapshots"? Sometimes such can also capture a scene with beauty and/or distinction. I never begrudge any shooter a great shot!
But, a great shot depends on the photographer's eye. And phone camera may be the only tool available for a "once in a lifetime" shot. If that what you got? Take the shot!
A bit of a warning. It's best to have a lotta glass when shooting a bear in the wild!
A lotta glass. Big, heavy glass that's a pain in the butt to haul into the wilds. That's the big difference between a serious shooter and a casual photographer simply capturing the sights.