GL Pease The Virginia Cream

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Drucquers Banner

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

quantumboy

Starting to Get Obsessed
Sep 2, 2015
185
1,348
Shreveport, Lousiana
I just can't do aromatics. Always some kind of chemical thing lurking in the background. This one is quite mild I will admit, but it's still there and it ruins the experience for me. Sorry, I will stick with Greg's amazing english/balkans and other fantastic blends, but this one will be going away now. One star because I don't like it at all, but if you're into aromatics please try it, it might just work for you.
 

Auxsender

Lifer
Jul 17, 2022
1,579
7,587
Nashville
“I hate aromatics” is not a blend review.

What exactly didn’t you like about the blend?
How did you pack the pipe?
What pipe was it?
Did you allow the baccy to dry? Did it need to be dried?
How did the tobacco smell before it was lit?
How did it behave in the bowl?
Does it have any redeeming qualities at all?
 

Waning Embers

Captain of the Black Frigate
Nov 12, 2014
47,718
128,972
When that one came out a decade ago it was often referred to as a non-aromatic aromatic. Greg was a regularly posting member here then and we had a lot of fun with it. Unless something's changed, it was one of the least flavored blends I've smoked.
 

Waning Embers

Captain of the Black Frigate
Nov 12, 2014
47,718
128,972
lol why even post this "review"? no tasting notes, just "i DoNt LiKe iT, aRoMaTicS bAd"
Well, it is an open forum. Reviews like that would make sorting through redundant chapters of grass and stewed fruit much less complicated to navigate. It is just tobacco and nothing overly complicated. A list of components and a thumbs up or down would suffice.
 

quantumboy

Starting to Get Obsessed
Sep 2, 2015
185
1,348
Shreveport, Lousiana
Uh, he couldn't even do that, hence my post.

Who asked you anyway? Go back to not smoking or whatever you're doing.

Here you go my friend:

Since I particularly relish many pure Virginia tobaccos in my various assortment of pipes, and further have greatly appreciated many of GL Pease’s Virgina-forward blends, I was interested in giving his “The Virginia Cream” a whirl. Although the description mentions a light supplementation of vanilla flavor, I nevertheless, in spite of my disapprobation for flavored tobaccos, decided to give it a try based on Pease’s exemplary prominence among today’s tobacco blenders.

Pipes used for tasting include a Nording Freehand with a relatively large bowl, an excellent smoker which has performed faithfully for many years, a large-ish Danske Billard with a lovely sandblasted finish, and a faithful meerschaum which, although lacking branding, has been a very satisfying and successful instrument for extreme oxidation of various pipe tobaccos.

Upon lighting, it became obvious that the Virginia tobaccos in this blend were quite light, quite tangy, somewhat tasteless, quite underwhelming, a bit harsh, and tended to bite the tongue a little more than desired. An ashy flavor remained forward on the palate, the flavors completely lacking the profundity of flavor commonly associated with some of Pease’s other exemplary Virginia blends.

Additionally, the flavoring, although somewhat benign, was palpable, enough so as to become off-putting, since it manifested, as most aromatic tobacco blends do in my pie hole, as a chemical presence not unlike hair spray. I, admittedly, have never enjoyed the taste of hair spray and confidently maintain to this day that this axiom still holds true.

The physical properties of said tobacco blend were acceptable, providing copious smoke, very few relights, and a mannerly demeanor in the bowl. However, both the acerbic violence inflicted on my tongue and tastebuds, and the lackluster flavors of the tobacco itself militated against my personal tobacco tasting sensibilities, and I concluded that while one who appreciates aromatic blends may indeed find gratification in The Virgina Cream, I nevertheless will not be indulging myself any further, especially in light of the surfeit of great tobacco blends from which I can choose, including many from Pease himself.
 

quantumboy

Starting to Get Obsessed
Sep 2, 2015
185
1,348
Shreveport, Lousiana
“I hate aromatics” is not a blend review.

What exactly didn’t you like about the blend?
How did you pack the pipe?
What pipe was it?
Did you allow the baccy to dry? Did it need to be dried?
How did the tobacco smell before it was lit?
How did it behave in the bowl?
Does it have any redeeming qualities at all?

Please see my reply to your comrade in arms Peter Turbo. Also, please let me know if there is anything else I can accomplish today to make your life more enjoyable. :)
 

khiddy

Part of the Furniture Now
Jun 21, 2024
966
4,497
South Bend, Indiana
blog.hallenius.org
Here you go my friend:

Since I particularly relish many pure Virginia tobaccos in my various assortment of pipes, and further have greatly appreciated many of GL Pease’s Virgina-forward blends, I was interested in giving his “The Virginia Cream” a whirl. Although the description mentions a light supplementation of vanilla flavor, I nevertheless, in spite of my disapprobation for flavored tobaccos, decided to give it a try based on Pease’s exemplary prominence among today’s tobacco blenders.

Pipes used for tasting include a Nording Freehand with a relatively large bowl, an excellent smoker which has performed faithfully for many years, a large-ish Danske Billard with a lovely sandblasted finish, and a faithful meerschaum which, although lacking branding, has been a very satisfying and successful instrument for extreme oxidation of various pipe tobaccos.

Upon lighting, it became obvious that the Virginia tobaccos in this blend were quite light, quite tangy, somewhat tasteless, quite underwhelming, a bit harsh, and tended to bite the tongue a little more than desired. An ashy flavor remained forward on the palate, the flavors completely lacking the profundity of flavor commonly associated with some of Pease’s other exemplary Virginia blends.

Additionally, the flavoring, although somewhat benign, was palpable, enough so as to become off-putting, since it manifested, as most aromatic tobacco blends do in my pie hole, as a chemical presence not unlike hair spray. I, admittedly, have never enjoyed the taste of hair spray and confidently maintain to this day that this axiom still holds true.

The physical properties of said tobacco blend were acceptable, providing copious smoke, very few relights, and a mannerly demeanor in the bowl. However, both the acerbic violence inflicted on my tongue and tastebuds, and the lackluster flavors of the tobacco itself militated against my personal tobacco tasting sensibilities, and I concluded that while one who appreciates aromatic blends may indeed find gratification in The Virgina Cream, I nevertheless will not be indulging myself any further, especially in light of the surfeit of great tobacco blends from which I can choose, including many from Pease himself.
AI-assisted?
 

Auxsender

Lifer
Jul 17, 2022
1,579
7,587
Nashville
Please see my reply to your comrade in arms Peter Turbo. Also, please let me know if there is anything else I can accomplish today to make your life more enjoyable. :)
LOL!
I appreciate the snark.
There is nothing I can think of at the moment but I’ll reach out the second something comes to mind.
 

burleyboy75

Starting to Get Obsessed
May 22, 2025
168
332
Ohio
No, I actually have a vocabulary. My wife is an English major!
damn, well, nice ad hoc write up then. I enjoyed both of them.

Side note, i love the reviews that give an anecdote or tidbit without going over the top.

I read one from pipestud about a blend being easygoing and low maintenance, much like a woman he had spent time with. He went on to say that neither the tobacco nor the woman garnered enough interest to keep him coming back. Cant recall the blend, but great review.

I read another one where the guy wrote a few thousand words and waxed about the tobacco being akin to a dinner party where you know you are going to get laid afterwards. Set up a lot of little details to place you in the scene. Seemed a bit over the top.

Fine line to tow for me i guess now that I think about it. I do find my palate isnt as refined as many and I think as a result, I do in a way like reading more about overall impressions and emotions elicited vs the “stoned fruit, grass, cocoa” stuff embers mentioned.