Gandalf, the Churchwarden Clencher

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

36 Fresh Vauen Pipes
6 Fresh GH.ZHANG Pipes
12 Fresh Castello Pipes
New Cigars
3 Fresh Peter Heding Pipes

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Drucquers Banner

SBC

Lifer
Oct 6, 2021
1,640
7,746
NE Wisconsin
@SBC what incredible posts!

Regarding Christopher Tolkien, I can't help but think he's just a bit miffed to have not done a JK Rowling, making billions in the process. I really liked the films, and have devoured the books - including the peripheral books - tens of times. I really disliked the Hobbit films though, felt like pure money grabbing. I think we still owe him a lot, we wouldn't have had a ton of the depth and backstories if he hadn't worked on his dad's unfinished writings. Regarding JRR Tolkien himself, part of the books that spoke to me was the underlying theme of restoring nature, both in the scouring of the Shire chapters as well as the Ents' attack of Isengard. The films couldn't capture that, but they also gave life to the books, and even in my opinion improved a few events where JRRT's writing was pretty incomprehensible.

Karam,

I'm sure that this is up for discussion, but Tolkien seems to have felt about land management the same way that Wendell Berry does -- namely, a "third way" besides (a) the industrial rape of the land, and (b) the assumption that mankind is intrinsically a cancer to the earth, and that any given piece of land is always at its maximal potential when untouched by man.

Berry taught, contra both of these options, that man is to "husband" or "steward" the earth in a way that is maximally beneficial to both mankind and the land. That many pieces of land are brought to their maximal potential by husbanding them with regenerative agricultural practices. Practices which build rather than deplete topsoil. Agriculture which leaves the land richer for the next go-round.

These practices are not the most lucrative in the short term -- you can't build a factory-farm oligarchy on them -- but they're seen to be the most efficient in the long view, if you love your descendants more than you love yourself.

To paint the picture in Tolkien's terms:
An industrial approach to the land produces Mordor.
A wilderness-worship approach to the land produces Mirkwood.
Husbanding the land produces The Shire.

(...then again, The Shire seems even more special when you know that out there, somewhere, there are Mirkwoods to traverse and Mordors to defeat ;-) )