First Smoke of Stanwell Harlekin Pipes: A Review

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

36 Fresh Chacom Pipes
12 Fresh Ardor Pipes
3 Fresh Konstantin Shekita Pipes
12 Fresh Caminetto Pipes
12 Fresh Estate Pipes

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aug 1, 2012
4,610
5,170
I promised a review and here it is. I got both of these for Christmas and only got to try them out today. Was going to try one out last night but it just didn't happen.
The pipes: 2 Stanwell Harlekins. They break down easily and are quite easy to clean. The bowl is Briar and the stem is acrylic. The body seems to be turned from a piece of lucite and is quite solid and light. They are 9mm filter pipes and I smoked one with the filter and one without. Both bowls are coated and I left the coatings in to give a try to the pipes as they would come new.
The specs are similar so I will give the measurements for the brown one. Length 4-4/5", bowl height 1-1.2" not including the threads, depth 3/4". Bowl outer diameter is 1-1/2" while the inside is a tiny 3/5". Both weighed about 37 grams. I was a bit surprised at the difference in depth from outside to inside the bowl but it did not turn out to be a bad thing.
The tobacco: a new tin of Pelican because I am familiar with its characteristics and tastes in a variety of pipes.
The smoke: Both pipes yielded a 15 minute smoke that was dry as a bone. The pipes burned a tiny bit hot (the smoke, not the briar) but not unpleasant and certainly better than some other pipes I have had before break-in. The one without the filter burned a touch hotter but yielded a bit of a more flavorful smoke. The one with the filter tamed the smoke a bit and still delivered most of the flavor I am used to from this tobacco. Given the choice, I would use the filter for some of my stronger aromatics but would skip it for blends like this one. The only hiccup to report is that one of them had a clogged up draft hole (it's at the bottom of the bowl and goes straight down similar to a Kirsten) midway through the smoke when I was tamping but that was easily remedied by unscrewing the bowl and dislodging it with a pipe cleaner.
The bottom line: These are a couple of great smoke-break pipes that will serve me well with ultra-strong tobaccos or just for a quick smoke. When compared with my Tsuge metal blowfish, they fall short in both the taste and temperature tests but for the difference in price, $15 vs $110-ish, they are absolutely worth looking at.
Lest you think I forgot...pics. Top is the pipes broken down and bottom is the whole Christmas group.
dscn3188-600x450.jpg


christmas-pipes-600x450.jpg


 
Aug 1, 2012
4,610
5,170
As far as I can work out, you have to buy a whole extra pipe if you want extra bowls but they are interchangeable.

 

mso489

Lifer
Feb 21, 2013
41,210
60,466
I'm a new appreciator of small pipes, after years of having nothing smaller than a Group 4.

For certain times, a small pipe is perfect. I think they work better than just filling a medium

pipe a third full. They burn better, more evenly, if you want twenty minute smoke. These

little pipes look well made and pleasingly colorful.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.