I can see where the OP is coming from, even though there are a lot of valid statements about going for exactly what you want, or for the general cost effectiveness of this hobby (most especially for US citizens). One thing that needs to be addressed is the palate at play. If you do not have a well informed palate and are still working your way there, or if your tastes can be satisfied by more cost effective blends, then the cost differential between blends is in fact validly questionable. Like a booze palate; if you can't tell the difference between Caymus and Yellowtail, or Jim Beam and George T. Stagg, you really really should try them both, but don't bankrupt yourself until you yourself can clearly and honestly say to yourself "Damn! There are whole worlds of difference here! And I really DO like the "better" option". But, if you are truly happy with the one, why pay more because the other is better to some?