Dunhill Tobacco

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

17 Fresh Brebbia Pipes
6 Fresh Savinelli Autograph Pipes
24 Fresh Brulor Pipes
3 Fresh Lasse Skovgaard Pipes
48 Fresh Ropp Pipes

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Drucquers Banner

woodsroad

Lifer
Oct 10, 2013
12,641
20,130
SE PA USA
Pipe smokers keep insisting that Dunhill decided to distance themselves from tobacco. But it's just not true. BAT sells and continues to sell Dunhill cigarettes. I think it's more accurate to say the Dunhill wants to distance itself from pipe smokers.

It is most likely that it cost BAT more to administer the licensing agreement with STG than they were making. I have a little experience with such matters, and see this as the likely culprit.
 

Fumatore

Lurker
Oct 9, 2021
16
6
Hope I'm not ranting or off topic but I believe it was sometime in the early 90’s I started smoking Dunhill blends probably 75% of the time (MM 965, Standard Mixture Medium, London Mixture, Nightcap, Early Morning Pipe, and Elizabethan). They were Murray blended and the quality was unsurpassed.

When Murray sold to Orlik the Dunhill blends went to hell IMO (some say that Orlik didn’t have much quality control and some Danish blends got mixed in the blends but I don’t think so, I believe they just used cheaper or other tobaccos. The only one I found that was reasonably close to the original was Standard Mixture Medium.

Too, I remember that Murray’s MM 965 always used a BROWN Cavendish in the blend and whatever was in that Cavendish mix I do not believe was carried forward. I also believe Murray’s 965 used a sweeter and high quality Macedonian tobacco (I recall the ads for the blend mentioned the claim).

The STG and Peterson blends I have tried lately may be somewhat better but none that I have tried remind me of the quality of those old Murray blends I listed above. Of course it’s been awhile.