DUNHILL 1925 MAGNUM

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

UltraBlue

Might Stick Around
Feb 16, 2024
69
99
Bingo.👍

Do you clench them?
Before we change the topic:
That Dunhill Billiard at 3,x inch chamber is a Magnum. Richard Esserman has the exact same size for his billiards and it’s consistent with most Dunhill Magnums.
The pipe lasts ~2.5 hours.
And no, it’s not a group 6.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Waning Embers

sablebrush52

The Bard Of Barlings
Jun 15, 2013
23,063
58,957
Southern Oregon
jrs457.wixsite.com
@sablebrush52

Show us what a magum looks like.;)
Yeah, show us something like this:
I don’t go after magnums, so I only have 2 of them.

There’s this 1910 Barling, probably intended to head a window display:

IMG_1557.jpegIMG_1559.jpeg
IMG_1559.jpeg

It's ab out 9 1/2 inches in length. Bowl height is about 3", maybe slightly less, chamber diameter is slightly more than an inch, and the depth is about 2". Depending on the blend, you can get a couple of hour smoke out of a chamber.

The other Barling is from 1883. About 10" in length, bowl height is about 2 1/2" chamber diameter is about 1". I haven't estimated the chamber height, but it's another hours long commitment to smoke:

4mSbg1c.jpg

igpeOyO.jpg

nSv84T4.jpg


Very likely a bespoke pipe for someone with a significant amount of money, given the cost of tobacco at that time.
 
Last edited:

Waning Embers

Captain of the Black Frigate
Nov 12, 2014
47,763
129,165
Please share some pictures of your pipes…. The big ones you’re referring to….
I only have one pipe in my possession now, a Fatih meerschaum that my daughter got for me buy here's some I used to have.

The smallest chambers of these from Bruce Weaver were 1"x2".
20200520_171756.jpg
The standouts with 3 inch deep chambers were these two.
20220707_132940.jpgRemini20220404004102814.jpg

A big Moretti was my tin killer.
20180811_233952-1-1.jpg

I had the big ones in meerschaum too.
20230505_203054.jpg20240309_180817.jpg20220530_144816.jpgv8SP6tp.jpeg.jpg20210903_011744.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Choatecav

UltraBlue

Might Stick Around
Feb 16, 2024
69
99
I only have one pipe in my possession now, a Fatih meerschaum that my daughter got for me buy here's some I used to have.

The smallest chambers of these from Bruce Weaver were 1"x2".
View attachment 441631
The standouts with 3 inch deep chambers were these two.
View attachment 441634View attachment 441635

A big Moretti was my tin killer.
View attachment 441641

I had the big ones in meerschaum too.
View attachment 441636View attachment 441637View attachment 441638View attachment 441639View attachment 441640
Delightful.
Thank you for sharing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Waning Embers

UltraBlue

Might Stick Around
Feb 16, 2024
69
99
I don’t go after magnums, so I only have 2 of them.

There’s this 1910 Barling, probably intended to head a window display:

View attachment 441632View attachment 441633
View attachment 441633

It's ab out 9 1/2 inches in length. Bowl height is about 3", maybe slightly less, chamber diameter is slightly more than an inch, and the depth is about 2". Depending on the blend, you can get a couple of hour smoke out of a chamber.

The other Barling is from 1883. About 10" in length, bowl height is about 2 1/2" chamber diameter is about 1". I haven't estimated the chamber height, but it's another hours long commitment to smoke:

4mSbg1c.jpg

igpeOyO.jpg

nSv84T4.jpg


Very likely a bespoke pipe for someone with a significant amount of money, given the cost of tobacco at that time.
Awesome!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Waning Embers

UltraBlue

Might Stick Around
Feb 16, 2024
69
99
Oh I commissioned this one.
It took like one year to be made.
Experts saying it was impossible:
Impossible to find the huge block (got it from JT Cooke)
Impossible to do the double rings because the machine was banging against the shank (special tool was made)
Impossible to find the big silver ring (a British napkin holder from 1946 was used
Impossible to bend vulcanite thicker than one inch (stem and a special tool was used)
Impossible to cut and insert the silver triangle into the stem (lasers and a fancy process was used)
Impossible to find the secret curing process used by JT Cooke (we found it)
Impossible to replicate the proportions of the GBD 9242 from 1950 used as a model
Every single part and angle was scaled
Well, it came out really well indeed and it smokes like a dream (little over 3 hours)
Hope this helps.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2666.jpeg
    IMG_2666.jpeg
    116.4 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_2662.jpeg
    IMG_2662.jpeg
    104.6 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_2661.jpeg
    IMG_2661.jpeg
    124.3 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_2660.jpeg
    IMG_2660.jpeg
    123.3 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_2659.jpeg
    IMG_2659.jpeg
    124.5 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_2658.jpeg
    IMG_2658.jpeg
    151.1 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_2664.jpeg
    IMG_2664.jpeg
    417.1 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_2669.jpeg
    IMG_2669.jpeg
    109 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_4247.jpeg
    IMG_4247.jpeg
    152.4 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_6721.jpeg
    IMG_6721.jpeg
    136.7 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_6724.jpeg
    IMG_6724.jpeg
    145.1 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_6727.jpeg
    IMG_6727.jpeg
    200.3 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_6726.jpeg
    IMG_6726.jpeg
    205.5 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_6730.jpeg
    IMG_6730.jpeg
    194.8 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_6729.jpeg
    IMG_6729.jpeg
    93 KB · Views: 11

UltraBlue

Might Stick Around
Feb 16, 2024
69
99
Oh I commissioned this one.
It took like one year to be made.
Experts saying it was impossible:
Impossible to find the huge block (got it from JT Cooke)
Impossible to do the double rings because the machine was banging against the shank (special tool was made)
Impossible to find the big silver ring (a British napkin holder from 1946 was used
Impossible to bend vulcanite thicker than one inch (stem and a special tool was used)
Impossible to cut and insert the silver triangle into the stem (lasers and a fancy process was used)
Impossible to find the secret curing process used by JT Cooke (we found it)
Impossible to replicate the proportions of the GBD 9242 from 1950 used as a model
Every single part and angle was scaled
Well, it came out really well indeed and it smokes like a dream (little over 3 hours)
Hope this helps.
Oh I commissioned this one.
It took like one year to be made.
Experts saying it was impossible:
Impossible to find the huge block (got it from JT Cooke)
Impossible to do the double rings because the machine was banging against the shank (special tool was made)
Impossible to find the big silver ring (a British napkin holder from 1946 was used
Impossible to bend vulcanite thicker than one inch (stem and a special tool was used)
Impossible to cut and insert the silver triangle into the stem (lasers and a fancy process was used)
Impossible to find the secret curing process used by JT Cooke (we found it)
Impossible to replicate the proportions of the GBD 9242 from 1950 used as a model
Every single part and angle was scaled
Well, it came out really well indeed and it smokes like a dream (little over 3 hours)
Hope this helps.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2847.jpeg
    IMG_2847.jpeg
    59.7 KB · Views: 5
  • IMG_2663.jpeg
    IMG_2663.jpeg
    184.4 KB · Views: 4
  • IMG_2657.jpeg
    IMG_2657.jpeg
    56.2 KB · Views: 6
  • IMG_2654.jpeg
    IMG_2654.jpeg
    127.6 KB · Views: 5
  • IMG_2655.jpeg
    IMG_2655.jpeg
    99.4 KB · Views: 5
  • IMG_2604.jpeg
    IMG_2604.jpeg
    135.8 KB · Views: 4