Do the effects of aging tobacco decrease nicotine content?
IT TURNS INTO DIFFERENT NICOTINE. BETTER, HIPPER NICOTINE.Do the effects of aging tobacco decrease nicotine content?
IT TURNS INTO DIFFERENT NICOTINE. BETTER, HIPPER NICOTINE.
Honestly I don’t know that anyone knows. It would probably take a lab analysis of the same blend aged vs new. Of course it would have to be something blended exactly the same as the aged sample.I've seen someone post something about this, but it was vague.
Back in the 80's, a friend's father took us on a tour of a processing plant for cigarettes. They pressed the juices out of tobacco, so that they could control the nicotine and tar levels, plus add in cherry flavors, and other flavors, and sugars that give cigarettes their very specific proprietorial flavors. And, then they added those juices back to the dry cellulose that was left. So, yes, cigarettes COULD have way less nicotine, but... it's not a natural tobacco. Pipes and cigars are left in a natural state. This is why they could never post the nicotine and tar levels on pipe tobacco and cigars.According to some reports I was reading recently, about how pipes and cigars are more evil than cigarettes... apparently pipes and cigars have some 500 times as much nicotine
Reaches for my 1960’s Gold Block...Honestly I don’t know that anyone knows. It would probably take a lab analysis of the same blend aged vs new. Of course it would have to be something blended exactly the same as the aged sample.
I can tell you I smoked 1960s gold block and it’s certainly still got nicotine. Got me twisted.
If they do, I'm going to be pissed.Do the effects of aging tobacco decrease nicotine content?
It was definitely an anti tobacco type. My folks are coming into town next week, and no matter how old I get, they like to lecture. When they see the pipes and tobacco the lecture will soon follow... I was trying to find any study comparing, say, cigars and car exhaust but couldn’t find anything excepts the same boiler plate article copied by every on-line medical entity. Using statements like “cigars have 50 times as much nicotine as cigarettes.” I was trying to find something saying how much is actually absorbed. Doesn’t matter how much nicotine it has if the lining of the mouth (I don’t inhale pipe or cigar smoke intentionally) only absorbs a trace. There is a whole lot more surface are available to absorb gasses in the lungs from cigarettes. But alas... nothing but all tobacco’s are equal in everything and a guarantee of death articles. Wasn’t in the mood to log into “science direct” To go through whatever studies they had.?Back in the 80's, a friend's father took us on a tour of a processing plant for cigarettes. They pressed the juices out of tobacco, so that they could control the nicotine and tar levels, plus add in cherry flavors, and other flavors, and sugars that give cigarettes their very specific proprietorial flavors. And, then they added those juices back to the dry cellulose that was left. So, yes, cigarettes COULD have way less nicotine, but... it's not a natural tobacco. Pipes and cigars are left in a natural state. This is why they could never post the nicotine and tar levels on pipe tobacco and cigars.
However, even a mild Virginia has a crap ton of nicotine, but because it is more acidic, you will never be able to ingest it into your bloodstream unless you eat it. But, smoked in a pipe, you might not ever get any effect from the nicotine. That doesn't make it more dangerous. So, someone reporting that is merely misleading its readers, probably to meet an anti-smoking agenda.
I've found that you can't change someone's mind with facts and articles... use class... suave, decadence... pipes are gentlemanly, debonaire... inquisitive... the aroma is intoxicating, like smell of wine, the finest tobaccos. People who grow pipe tobacco are more the vineyard keepers... the pipe tobacco processors are vinters, winemakers... the blenders are artists... the smoker is a connoisseur... aged tobaccos from the leaves of finest plants... not cigarette tobacco growers who are dirty, barefoot bumkins by comparison to those in the pipe tobacco industry. The guys who spray chemicals and dump artificial fertilizers, killing the soil and water supplies. The pipe smoker is the epithet of what all men strive to be. The thinker, contemplator of beauty. THAT SELLS it. Not a bunch of scientists scrabbling over new topics to write about to keep their research grants. You know... whether all of that is true about gentlemanly or not... it does make a better sell.It was definitely an anti tobacco type. My folks are coming into town next week, and no matter how old I get, they like to lecture. When they see the pipes and tobacco the lecture will soon follow... I was trying to find any study comparing, say, cigars and car exhaust but couldn’t find anything excepts the same boiler plate article copied by every on-line medical entity. Using statements like “cigars have 50 times as much nicotine as cigarettes.” I was trying to find something saying how much is actually absorbed. Doesn’t matter how much nicotine it has if the lining of the mouth (I don’t inhale pipe or cigar smoke intentionally) only absorbs a trace. There is a whole lot more surface are available to absorb gasses in the lungs from cigarettes. But alas... nothing but all tobacco’s are equal in everything and a guarantee of death articles. Wasn’t in the mood to log into “science direct” To go through whatever studies they had.?