It's like the Zen Buddhist teachings (and that song by Donovan) say: First there's a mountain, then there isn't. Then there is again.
There's always something you like at first. But then you begin to compare and by default, those things compete. At first, for most of us... we like aromatics. Then we find out about non-aro's and it becomes about factoring aromatics vs non-aro's. What do we like better? Which is superior? We treat tobaccos like we have to pick a school to marry, and to whom we must stay faithful.
But after time and space between us and our most recent aro have been had, we try another aromatic and find ourselves enchanted - not by what it offers against non-aro's, but by what it offers on its own. Once this happens, you'll know you've reached a full appreciation of what you're sampling.
First there's an aromatic, then there isn't. Then there is again.
There's always something you like at first. But then you begin to compare and by default, those things compete. At first, for most of us... we like aromatics. Then we find out about non-aro's and it becomes about factoring aromatics vs non-aro's. What do we like better? Which is superior? We treat tobaccos like we have to pick a school to marry, and to whom we must stay faithful.
But after time and space between us and our most recent aro have been had, we try another aromatic and find ourselves enchanted - not by what it offers against non-aro's, but by what it offers on its own. Once this happens, you'll know you've reached a full appreciation of what you're sampling.
First there's an aromatic, then there isn't. Then there is again.