Regarding tobacco, assaad is right on the money. Good luck trying to get tobacco farms around the world to go organic. If you have a blend with African virginias, Turkish orientals, and Syrian latakia, then you have a fat chance that you'd ever get organic certification even if all hands followed loosely organic methods. It would not be a bad thing if tobacco was organic, because I don't see how we could lose; I just think that it is too unlikely to even talk about.
(Again, some small scale organic tobacco may be on the market, but I can't see it getting bigger than RYO or maybe a new cigarette brand. American Spirits, which use the "natural" moniker, are not organic)
photoman13,
That's because the profiteers are latching onto the concept. It doesn't have to be that way. I believe that organic farming and sustainable agriculture in general can feed all but we import most of our food where I live and the grocery stores charge a steep premium for organics. You would have to have an above average income to eat that way... I read Organic Inc by Samuel Fromartz not long ago, and that looks at how the industry has consolidated and how you see a marketing shift towards an "upscale" image for organics. The reality is, however, that most of our food is artificially cheap and that processed foods cost more in the long run.
Spartan,
I'm not trying to make a mountain out of a molehill, I just didn't understand your metaphor. Seatbelts are a mandatory around here and they have been for my entire life, so I don't particularly see that as a bad or nonsensical thing. Thanks for clarifying that for me.
Baron Samedi,
I'm just going to have to agree to disagree on just about all of the premises you've listed above. I think there are numerous oversimplifications in your statement.