I've got one that can see!Money's a red herring, IMO.
The real goal is the gradual erosion of autonomy.
The point of the thousands of behavioral restrictions enacted into law is teaching people to obey.
The rest is gravy.
Obey, obey, obey, obey. Operant conditioning.
Once the habit of obedience is instilled, your job is 90% done.
Social engineering (population control) 101.
Sort of like switching people from pipes/cigars to cigarettes.Get people hooked, ban the one and introduce the next strongest thing.
Interesting history.During the 1990s, for example, three communities in Massachusetts implemented a vigorous enforcement campaign against under-age tobacco sales. Advocates promised teen smoking would fall sharply when it became harder to buy cigarettes. High-profile “stings” exposed the stores that were selling to youths.
The result, according to a two-year study by medical school researchers? Failure. Strict enforcement of minimum-age laws did make it so fewer stores sold tobacco to minors. But surveys of high school students in those same communities revealed no effect on the ability of teens to get cigarettes and no reduction in the prevalence of smoking. In fact, there was an increase in teenage smoking compared with nearby communities that hadn't cracked down.
Similar patterns have played out on a national scale.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-0313-males-teen-smoking-20160313-story.html
It is fascinating to see the panic of the ruling criminal oligarchy over a candidate who has gained immense popularity and is independently wealthy enough to finance his own campaign...and who they can't trust (because they don't have enough dirt on him to blackmail him) trying to get into the White House.Soros funded brown coat March, marches in on a mans campaign speech, whether you like the man or not, his supporters reserved the right to hear him speak. Strange things are on the scene. Strange indeed.