Ok, this post is sure to be viewed by some as controversial and, perhaps, even heretical.
I have nothing against C&D. In fact, I think they make some very fine blends, a few of which I cellar in some quantity. However, it is also true that they are the least represented major brand in my cellar, and I know I can't be the only one for whom this is true.
In my view, their entire tobacco line is disjointed and needs focus. The last time I looked, they had over 200 (!) different blends, many of which, I would suggest, are largely ignored by pipe smokers. One might even suggest that they take a scatter gun approach to blending - they seem to commonly introduce a new blend with some subtle difference from an old blend, perhaps throw in a new ingredient or change the proportion of an existing one, and then offer it for sale under a different cute and catchy little name.
The problem I see is that they seem to have so many average blends, that they are unable to concentrate their efforts on developing show-stopping, brand-defining, blends. They appear to be slouching toward mediocrity - a jack of all trades, yes, but a master of nothing.
I appreciate that one man's Mixture 79 is another man's Three Nuns, but I think it would be hard to argue against the proposition that they have a lot of crappy and mediocre blends in their stable. What do you think? Is it time for C&D to cull the herd and focus their energy on producing a lesser number of top blends?
I do wonder if their strategic direction will change as a result of the recent merger with Laudisi, and I hope that it does.
I have nothing against C&D. In fact, I think they make some very fine blends, a few of which I cellar in some quantity. However, it is also true that they are the least represented major brand in my cellar, and I know I can't be the only one for whom this is true.
In my view, their entire tobacco line is disjointed and needs focus. The last time I looked, they had over 200 (!) different blends, many of which, I would suggest, are largely ignored by pipe smokers. One might even suggest that they take a scatter gun approach to blending - they seem to commonly introduce a new blend with some subtle difference from an old blend, perhaps throw in a new ingredient or change the proportion of an existing one, and then offer it for sale under a different cute and catchy little name.
The problem I see is that they seem to have so many average blends, that they are unable to concentrate their efforts on developing show-stopping, brand-defining, blends. They appear to be slouching toward mediocrity - a jack of all trades, yes, but a master of nothing.
I appreciate that one man's Mixture 79 is another man's Three Nuns, but I think it would be hard to argue against the proposition that they have a lot of crappy and mediocre blends in their stable. What do you think? Is it time for C&D to cull the herd and focus their energy on producing a lesser number of top blends?
I do wonder if their strategic direction will change as a result of the recent merger with Laudisi, and I hope that it does.