On the money, fnord! Cool stuff sneaks into these posts sometimes.
Having trouble with this one, yet:
???
Put your name on a marriage certificate and see if it's a "label" and nothing else. I lost my house, my life savings, and half of my retirement for doing that!
I checked up on the original meaning of brand, and it originally meant the same thing it means now: "mine." Steal a cow once that has a brand on it. See if there's "and nothing more."
We trust brand names because the company signed it. They're proud of it. If you look up synonyms for brand, you'll find "identification, distinct type." One gave the example of "brand of incisive humor."
In your posts, Woodsroad, you demonstrate a "brand" of humor distinctive to you. It's not just perception that it is distinctive. It has tangible, quantifiable components to it. Analysts can measure what percentage is surprising ambiguity, how much is wry or ironic, what portion is based on puns. They can compare yours to others. It's your "brand." The elements aren't yours; the way you assemble them is.
Same as pipe companies. One brand does differ from another. But it's not that one briar tastes better.
I don't know how Stanwell and Peterson and Dunhill stack up against each other as a whole. I only know that if I have a chance to get a steal on a new pipe, and I see one of those brands on it, I will trust it a whole lot more. Those are established brands with large customer followings. Any of them, I'll give a shot.
Brand is real. It matters. But which brands enhance your personal smoking experience, oh that's entirely subjective. That's personal.
Can't really be about taste, though. That's up to a specific, individual pipe and its history of use, the tobacco in it, how it was filled, how it was lit and piper combination ... not a brand. No one is arguing with Dr. Hanna about that. (Not in these forums, anyway. Evidently Hanna ran with some people who said they could tell them apart blindfolded. But I haven't heard anyone in Pipesmagazine say they could. Hanna is unopposed on his primary point).
Having trouble with this one, yet:
I was with you until the very last three words. What's with the "and nothing else." The first part there has tremendous significance. But then you added "and that's all it is."Look back at the word origin for "brand" and you'll understand what it means. It's a label and nothing else.
???
Put your name on a marriage certificate and see if it's a "label" and nothing else. I lost my house, my life savings, and half of my retirement for doing that!
I checked up on the original meaning of brand, and it originally meant the same thing it means now: "mine." Steal a cow once that has a brand on it. See if there's "and nothing more."
We trust brand names because the company signed it. They're proud of it. If you look up synonyms for brand, you'll find "identification, distinct type." One gave the example of "brand of incisive humor."
In your posts, Woodsroad, you demonstrate a "brand" of humor distinctive to you. It's not just perception that it is distinctive. It has tangible, quantifiable components to it. Analysts can measure what percentage is surprising ambiguity, how much is wry or ironic, what portion is based on puns. They can compare yours to others. It's your "brand." The elements aren't yours; the way you assemble them is.
Same as pipe companies. One brand does differ from another. But it's not that one briar tastes better.
I don't know how Stanwell and Peterson and Dunhill stack up against each other as a whole. I only know that if I have a chance to get a steal on a new pipe, and I see one of those brands on it, I will trust it a whole lot more. Those are established brands with large customer followings. Any of them, I'll give a shot.
Brand is real. It matters. But which brands enhance your personal smoking experience, oh that's entirely subjective. That's personal.
Can't really be about taste, though. That's up to a specific, individual pipe and its history of use, the tobacco in it, how it was filled, how it was lit and piper combination ... not a brand. No one is arguing with Dr. Hanna about that. (Not in these forums, anyway. Evidently Hanna ran with some people who said they could tell them apart blindfolded. But I haven't heard anyone in Pipesmagazine say they could. Hanna is unopposed on his primary point).