Whatever. No one has to like what I wrote or how I wrote it.
I had one spontaneously combust and it hadn’t even been used recently. It was a low cost disposable bic-like but a cheaper see-thru type. Never seen anything like that happen ever but the 1 time. It left this permanent scorch mark on my cherrywood tableI work in the local emergency room. Yesterday, an elderly patient came in by ambulance after they had suffered severe burns to their face, neck, and ears. Their hair was singed and black, crispy ashes were falling onto the pillow. The entire room smelled like burnt hair and the patient was in tremendous pain. It turns out, this patient was lighting their tobacco pipe when their lighter exploded catching their shirt on fire (that it was tobacco and not something else was verified by the EMS team). They ran to the bathroom to extinguish themselves before calling 911. They were subsequently transferred to a level one trauma center.
I may switch to using matches exclusively.....
Usage of “they/them” as a nonspecific singular pronoun dates back centuries. Whether or not people get triggered by it has varied over time, though.Traditionally, with grammar, pronouns need to agree in number. "An elderly patient" is singular, so using "they" does not agree in number—it should typically be "he" or "she"—however, these days, gender fluidity and such appears to be bending the rules where usage of "they" is now acceptable when referring to one person. Language is constantly evolving and rules change.
This is certainly the million dollar question.Any idea of what kind of lighter? I worked at a drop forge factory after high school & we were only allowed to have Zippos on the floor. Pressurized/butane lighters will explode if they get too hot.
I guess I didn't find the singular use of "they" all that surprising as I've used and encountered it in the past. Some quick research to see what language authorities have to say yielded this trove of information.Usage of “they/them” as a nonspecific singular pronoun dates back centuries. Whether or not people get triggered by it has varied over time, though.
Fair enough. I doubt I’d feel very chatty either.No, I did not get an opportunity to ask many questions as my patient (singular) said, "I don't feel much like conversation."
Traditionally, with grammar, pronouns need to agree in number. "An elderly patient" is singular, so using "they" does not agree in number—it should typically be "he" or "she"—however, these days, gender fluidity and such appears to be bending the rules where usage of "they" is now acceptable when referring to one person. Language is constantly evolving and rules change.
@condorlover1 You're correct but no flaming sheep turd; the blacksmith lit my clay pipe with an ember from his forge. Here's a pic of my the Redcoats & Revolutionaries blacksmith ('the pipe lighter' as Dad calls him:Maybe half dan has a point when he tells us about lighting his clay pipe with a flaming sheep turd from a blacksmith forge or something like that!
He could have said "people's diet changes all the time." But I'm sure, give the option, he didn't want to be Dahmer's roommate.It is what's behind the attempted rules change that is causing people to care about it.
Saying that "language changes over time" simultaneously side-steps and dismisses the issue. Like Jeffrey Dahmer's courtroom lawyer telling the jury that what he did wasn't a crime because "people die all the time."