As my hair turns to silver I can recall tobacco smells from fifty and sixty years ago, during my youth, and the old men in the barber shop mostly smoked either Prince Albert or Velvet, pinched out of little tin cans they carried in their front bib overall pocket.
Velvet and Prince Albert had distinctive aromas, both of which smelled like the promise of heaven to me.
Harry Hosterman smoked Prince Albert and gave me the wrappers so I could buy $2 Old Timer pocket knives with so many empty wrappers. Even now when I walk by my father’s milk barn I can recall the sweet licorice laced smell from his pipe. When I was old enough to smoke I naturally preferred Prince Albert, and I believe the blend today approximates what it tasted and smelled like then.
But Velvet has changed over the years, as I recall. The old Velvet advertisements boasted how Velvet was aged two years in oak barrels, and flavored with real maple sugar. Perhaps it still is, but they no longer brag about it.
As I understand tobacco history, Prince Albert was the first highly flavored, dual purpose, crimp cut moist tobacco sold in a small tin, instead of a sack. Velvet came along shortly afterwards. Price Albert sponsored the Grand Ole Opry, and became the butt of jokes about calling a whiskey store and asking if they had Prince Albert in a can, and demanding his release. Velvet always seemed to play second fiddle, the Lincoln instead of the Cadillac, Pepsi instead of Coke, and the lawyer of lines in songs where mothers were urged to raise their children to be doctors and lawyers, and such.
For years I’d occasionally buy a package of Velvet, and found it hotter burning and not quite the same as years ago. In recent years the Scandinavian Tobacco Group Lane Ltd. has acquired Velvet and restored the blend to as I remember it.
I’m smoking a bowl of Velvet now, and my wife and assistants love the aroma, and it tastes sweet and mild.
I wonder if the original Velvet formula is somewhere in a safe the way the formula for Coca Cola is rumored to be?
They shouldn’t change it, but a return to the little pocket tin would be welcomed.
When they discontinued the tins and used the foil luxury pouch with the Danish Freehand on the package is when I think Velvet went downhill, but I can’t be certain, it was too many years ago.
Velvet and Prince Albert had distinctive aromas, both of which smelled like the promise of heaven to me.
Harry Hosterman smoked Prince Albert and gave me the wrappers so I could buy $2 Old Timer pocket knives with so many empty wrappers. Even now when I walk by my father’s milk barn I can recall the sweet licorice laced smell from his pipe. When I was old enough to smoke I naturally preferred Prince Albert, and I believe the blend today approximates what it tasted and smelled like then.
But Velvet has changed over the years, as I recall. The old Velvet advertisements boasted how Velvet was aged two years in oak barrels, and flavored with real maple sugar. Perhaps it still is, but they no longer brag about it.
As I understand tobacco history, Prince Albert was the first highly flavored, dual purpose, crimp cut moist tobacco sold in a small tin, instead of a sack. Velvet came along shortly afterwards. Price Albert sponsored the Grand Ole Opry, and became the butt of jokes about calling a whiskey store and asking if they had Prince Albert in a can, and demanding his release. Velvet always seemed to play second fiddle, the Lincoln instead of the Cadillac, Pepsi instead of Coke, and the lawyer of lines in songs where mothers were urged to raise their children to be doctors and lawyers, and such.
For years I’d occasionally buy a package of Velvet, and found it hotter burning and not quite the same as years ago. In recent years the Scandinavian Tobacco Group Lane Ltd. has acquired Velvet and restored the blend to as I remember it.
I’m smoking a bowl of Velvet now, and my wife and assistants love the aroma, and it tastes sweet and mild.
I wonder if the original Velvet formula is somewhere in a safe the way the formula for Coca Cola is rumored to be?
They shouldn’t change it, but a return to the little pocket tin would be welcomed.
When they discontinued the tins and used the foil luxury pouch with the Danish Freehand on the package is when I think Velvet went downhill, but I can’t be certain, it was too many years ago.