Don’t forget to heat seal the bags intended for long term storage.T
Thank you for the idea. I now have Mylar bags on order!
Don’t forget to heat seal the bags intended for long term storage.T
Thank you for the idea. I now have Mylar bags on order!
I plan to break out my trusty Foodsaver.Don’t forget to heat seal the bags intended for long term storage.
Now that is a good idea!I’m wondering since Laudisi owns Peterson if they’ll now push to buy the Peterson/Dunhill blends from STG and have C&D produce them to keep them alive.
They have a funky smell that can transferr to the tobacco. Glass is probably a bad idea, will definitely break if the ammo can is droped and not efficient use of space. If storing bulk, I would vaccume seal it first to keep any odors from being absorbed, and to condense/compress it. Vacuume sealed and then inside in a 50cal can, they can be tossed around by a 900lb gorilla and still be fine.This new video from Bradly was a great excuse for ordering 15 more pounds for my cellar. I have Ball jars ready for the arrival, but they sure don’t stack as well as I would like.
This leads to my question for the group— Have any of you tried storing the 1 pound Sutliff ( or any other brand) plastic bags in .50 Caliber ammo cans? They have a built in gasket, they stack better than jars, and they are unlikely to break if they fall over.
Thank you for sharing any knowledge you may have.
Pretty sure STG won't, or will ask an absurd price. Kind of like putting a non compete on an employee you laid off. They seem intent on eliminating any competition, which seems to be what is behind the razing of Sutliff as opposed to putting it up for sale. I hope I am wrong.I’m wondering since Laudisi owns Peterson if they’ll now push to buy the Peterson/Dunhill blends from STG and have C&D produce them to keep them alive.
I agree, that hurt me a little too as I find manufacturing machinery in general quite interesting, particularly older equipment. I do wonder though if that's the case, whether the equipment was deemed to not be up to their standards, too costly to move, and or maintain/repair. Even if left intact I can't imagine there's much of a market for such equipment either.The destruction of manufacturing machines is not just immoral, it is mean and spiteful, imho.
It happens quite often in buyouts and mergers in favor of the buying company's equipment. They'd likely get more for the scrap versus the intact machinery and no cost of transport from one facility to another.The destruction of manufacturing machines is not just immoral, it is mean and spiteful, imho.
No.I'm a bit confused.
Admittedly I did not watch the video in its entirety in real time. I jumped to various points, watched several bits, and scanned the whole video at higher speed several times but nowhere did I see any actual "STG internal documents ". Can someone please provide the time(s) in the video when bona fide documents were shown?
He read what he received from his source. Certainly sounded like official plans to me.I'm a bit confused.
Admittedly I did not watch the video in its entirety in real time. I jumped to various points, watched several bits, and scanned the whole video at higher speed several times but nowhere did I see any actual "STG internal documents ". Can someone please provide the time(s) in the video when bona fide documents were shown?