I may be alone in this, but to me, the whole "breaking in" of a pipe is irrelevant to having a good smoke. It's been my experience that a pipe either smokes well, or it doesn't. My Savinelli is a fantastic smoker, and it has been from day one. It has a thin layer of cake in it, but I can't argue that it is better now than before. My Peterson, on the other hand, is finicky. It doesn't matter what type of tobacco is in there, she will gurgle about one third of the way in, and that is me taking my sweet time. I figured that some cake will help insulate it and keep it from gurgling, but that hasn't been the case. I think the engineering is a touch off and it smokes how it smokes. Now, I know that neither of these pipes are high end pieces, and I'm sure arguments can be made for or against breaking in more expensive models, but on the cheaper side of the issue, I have to go with the engineering of the pipe being much more important than breaking in. Anyone agree with me about this? Bueller?