I am not one for conspiracy theories but let us consider this. Not too long ago nobody cared if you smoked. The government was happy collecting the taxes on it and the medical profession was content on the occasional lung cancer patient. The medical profession never told us that 80 to 90% of people that smoke cigarettes never got lung cancer. Then all of a sudden it was discovered that nicotine had a positive effect on stopping or hindering the onset of Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's, MS and a host of other ailments. Nicotine patches are prescribed to some of those patients in many areas. So now nicotine in its purist state became a money-making agent for the medical profession. If they can eliminate smoking, then they would have complete control on how nicotine is dispersed. So maybe we should be blaming the medical profession for their greed and power-hungry ideas. Just something to think about.
I LOVE posts like this! Right from the beginning, where it states, "I am not one for conspiracy theories but let us consider this." It sets up a new conspiracy theory, essentially "blaming the medical profession for their greed and power-hungry ideas".
I would agree that the Medical Industrial Complex has become a potentially life threatening, as well as life savings threatening entity. Cost increases far outstrip inflation year after year. The cost of prescriptions can be stratospheric. Health Insurance is costly, and getting your insurance to actually cover your necessary treatment can amount to going to war.
But what is driving this? Is is greedy doctors? Thieving insurance companies? Skyrocketing malpractice insurance rates? Rapacious lawyers? Greedy victims? Incompetent lawmakers? Incompetent medical review boards? Corporatization of medical practices? Private equity stripping hospitals of assets and then selling them off for the real estate value?
Lot of things happening. Not much of them good. There's a lot to unpack. But how much of it amounts to conspiracy as opposed to the "free market" or "laissez faire" capitalism in action? Your healthcare is a commodity, like a television set or a roll of toilet paper.
"Not too long ago nobody cared if you smoked." In my 73 years of rotating around the sun, I've never encountered an environment where "nobody cared if you smoked". Sure, smoking was more widely accepted, even romanticized, but there were always people who hated the smell of tobacco smoke and would not tolerate being in the presence of it. Social acceptance has waned in the face of evidence that smoking is an unhealthy habit that can result not only in lung cancer, but in COPD and emphysema, as well as other medical conditions. Are these rates of disease actually the product of a grand conspiracy? The messaging surrounding smoking hasn't been delivered secretly, whispered in closed spaces. It's been right out front with the messengers openly identifying themselves.
"Then all of a sudden it was discovered that nicotine had a positive effect on stopping or hindering the onset of Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's, MS and a host of other ailments." There was a short term suggestion made that nicotine could be a helpful treatment, based on some observational studies which were proven to be wrong. So there doesn't seem to be any value there.
"The government was happy collecting the taxes on it..." The government is happy collecting taxes on anything that they can collect taxes on. But if the government merely saw smoking as a plus, why did it engage in studies of the economic effects of smoking, including productivity losses, an average of $6,000 a year per smoker, that cost the US economy hundreds of billions of dollars annually? Could hundreds of billions of dollars of lost productivity annually been a consideration in the government's decision to promote anti-smoking messaging and legislation? Or were the taxes on tobacco more important than the hundreds of billions of dollars in lost productivity?
I'm not seeing a grand conspiracy here. Just inconvenient facts.