“Just the Facts, Ma’am”
-
Kevin Godbee - Sep 8, 2011
- 5 min read
By C. R. S. Lyles
Tobacco could kill 1 billion this century.
That’s the headline of a heartwarming news article published in Reuters a few years ago which claims that "if current trends hold, global health experts said" that if we don’t lay off the smokes, then by 2100 we can kiss about 14% of the current population goodbye.
The report was gleaned from information published in the 2009 Tobacco Atlas by the World Lung Foundation and the American Cancer Society.
Here’s some of the numbers that were tossed in there for dramatic effect:
- Tobacco use costs the global economy $500 billion a year in direct medical expenses, lost productivity and environmental harm.
- 100 million people were killed by tobacco in the 20th century.
- Tobacco accounts for one out of every 10 deaths worldwide.
- Tobacco will kill 6 million people in 2010 from cancer, heart disease, emphysema and other diseases.
- Occupational exposure to secondhand smoke kills 200,000 workers every year.
First off, the whole "cost of direct medical expenses, lost productivity, blah blah blah" argument can be immediately marked off with the counter-argument of the tobacco tax.
For example, in 2007 alone the state of Texas tripled its cigarette tax revenues from $523 million to $1.5 billion despite a 21 percent decline in sales.
And that’s just the state of Texas, one state among 50, among dozens of countries who produce cigarettes, pipe tobacco, cigars, etc. who are all being charged an increased tobacco tax.
I think that this can cover the expenses. Hell, with the kind of money we’re talking about here, health facilities could probably afford to employ full-time personal masseuses for each of the patients that comes in.
Now, this article was published back in 2009, before anyone could accurately figure how the figures would be by the end of 2010.
However, we do have the luxury of examining that information, all of which can be found on the public websites of the American Cancer Society (ACS), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
In 2010, there were approximately 1,529,560 new cancer cases (all kinds of cancer, not just lung cancer), and approximately 569,490 deaths between both sexes (again, from all types of cancer).
There were approximately 667 deaths caused by bronchitis, 12,790 caused by emphysema, and 111,020 attributed to other chronic lower respiratory diseases (CLRD).
And, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, "every 26 seconds someone has a heart attack, and about every minute someone dies from one."
Let’s round those deaths up exactly one every minute, which gives us 1,440 deaths a day. Add them all up and that gives us 525,600 deaths a year.
Now, here’s where I get lost every time a health crusader tries to whittle some logic out of persecuting smokers based on statistics like this, because to me, here’s how the math breaks down:
- 667 bronchitis deaths + 12,790 emphysema deaths = 13,457 deaths
- 13,457 deaths + 111,020 CLRD deaths = 124,477 deaths
- 124,477 deaths + 569,490 deaths from cancer = 693,967 deaths
- 693,967 deaths + 525,600 heart disease deaths = 1,219,567 deaths
1,219,567 from cancer, heart disease, emphysema and other diseases.
I really haven’t heard of any new and terrifying side effects that tobacco causes besides the good ol’ standards of lung cancer, heart disease, and emphysema, but there must be some really ravenous and quiet effect that it has on people because that’s the only rational way that the other 4,780,433 lives that the World Lung Foundation and the American Cancer Society predicted tobacco would claim can be justified.
Now let’s really put that number to the test and see what comes up. The approximate number of deaths in 2010 range from between 59 and 60 million depending on which source you use, so let’s do the math and see if the WLF / ACS prediction was correct:
- 1,219,567 divided by 60,000,000 equals just a little over 2%
Now, granted, this figure didn’t remove the deaths by all the natural disasters and war casualties that occurred last year, but a claim of one in ten people is 10%, and….you get where I’m going with this.
Which leads me to the claim concerning 200,000 occupational secondhand smoke (SHS) deaths made by the World Lung Foundation and the American Cancer Society.
A handy piece of information for any smoker to know off-hand are the facts that were listed in the 1993 EPA report because this information will come in very handy should you ever find yourself in a debate with a vehement anti-smoker who will cite all the health hazards related to second hand smoke.
In 1992, the EPA issued a report which claimed that Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) caused 3,000 deaths per year (ETS is an interchangeable term for second hand smoke.)
However, the EPA announced these results BEFORE the study was finished, and the study that was being conducted was a Meta Analysis, or an analysis of pre-existing studies.
And even in the report itself, on page 3-46 the EPA estimates that nicotine measurements in non-smokers blood, "would translate to the equivalent of about one-fifth of a cigarette per day."
These facts were discovered while I was cruising around on the Internet and came across a website run by a Mr. Dave Hitt.
Mr. Hitt’s website provided a startling amount of information concerning second hand smoke under a tab titled (appropriately enough)The Facts.
On the CDC’s website, they make the claim that second hand smoke causes 3,400 annual deaths from lung cancer and 46,000 annual deaths from heart disease.
Just where are they getting these numbers from, anyway?
And how exactly is it possible to trust a source whose claims can be proven wildly inaccurate with just thirty minutes of searching on Google?
No matter how hard I’ve looked, I’ve yet to come across a clear explanation on how the process of data collecting, statistical equations and drawing conclusions from the process’s results works in regards to deaths attributed to second hand smoke, but then again I don’t really expect to find a clear answer about it.
Ignorance is, after all, the greatest tool that the shepherds use to keep the "sheeple" in line.
Carter R. Lyles is a student at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, FL and at the University of Florida in Gainesville. He is a journalism/psychology major, and in addition to his work at Pipes Magazine, he has contributed articles to The Alligator, Thursday Night Magazine, and The Fine Print. |
Written by Kevin Godbee
25 Responses
Recent Posts
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 624. Our featured interview tonight is with Jebediah “Jebi” Green. Jebi is a 28-year old pipe smoker from Oklahoma. His interview is part of our ongoing series of pipe smokers that are under the age of 30. He works as an electrical engineer optimizing radar for airports. His path to pipe smoking went from cigarettes to vape, and then finally to pipes. Pipes changed Jeb’s reason for smoking from ingesting nicotine to relaxing and enjoying the contemplative moment. At the top of the show Brian will discuss his “EDC” or “Everyday Carry” items for pipe smoking.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 623. Our featured interview tonight is with pipe maker Chris Herriot. Chris lives in France, and grew up in the U.K. He started making pipes during the pandemic and posting about his progress. Chris Kelly of Eldritch Pipes noticed and offered to teach him. Later, Chris traveled to St. Claude, France where pipe maker Bruno Nuttens offered him additional training. At the top of the show we will continue with our ongoing tour of Brian’s pipe collection with four pipes from Ernie Markle.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 622. Our featured interview tonight is with Noah Slasinski. Noah is a 28-year old pipe smoker from Michigan. His interview is part of our ongoing series of pipe smokers that are under the age of 30. He started with a Missouri Meerschaum hard wood pipe in his late teens and then tried just about every type of tobacco smoking and vaping, but eventually came back exclusively to pipe smoking about a year and a half ago. YouTube videos and Paul’s Pipe Shop in Flint MI helped him along the way. Similar to some of our other younger pipe enthusiasts, Noah was influenced by writers and intellectuals that he appreciates, such as Carl Jung, C.S. Lewis, Tolkien, Mark Twain and more, as they were all pipe smokers. At the top of the show we will have a trip report on the NASPC show from this past weekend in Colombus from Dave Peterson.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 621. Our featured interview tonight is with Ben Straughan. Ben is a 25-year old pipe smoker that is part of our ongoing series of pipe smokers that are under the age of 30. He is from Ontario, Canada and works in radio broadcasting, but is transitioning to be a mobile crane operator. Ben has been smoking a pipe for two years. He was drawn to it because the stereotypical image of the calm, contemplative, gentleman pipe smoker has great appeal to him, and it is what he aspires to be like. At the top of the show we will have an Ask the Tobacco Blender segment with Jeremy Reeves. Jeremy is the Head Blender at Cornell & Diehl, which is one of the most popular boutique pipe tobacco companies in the USA.
We’re in the dog days of summer, and in the heat and humidity I find my palate tends to become as erratic as the extreme weather. To be more precise, my entire biochemistry is busily making the continual adjustments that keep this finely-tuned machine old jalopy of a body in top form hobbling along, and my taste buds are a good indicator that the system is preoccupied with regulating itself. Therefore it’s no surprise that McCranie’s Roanoke, the tobacco that I’d been favoring since the winter months and regularly returning to between other review blends, just wasn’t hitting the spot anymore. We live in fortunate times that present no shortage of novel and interesting blends to try, so some speculation toward new flavors is in order. This month’s spotlight will thus fall on a couple of summer sequels, of a sort: first, the latest installment of Per Jensen’s Pipe Force line, Episode II to be exact; second, a new incarnation of Seattle Pipe Club’s Hogshead, this time with a bourbon barrel-aged twist. Much like The Empire Strikes Back improved on the previous film in that series, Episode II is a generational improvement on the English profile offered in Episode I. To my personal taste, while I enjoyed Episode I quite a bit, it didn’t have a definable hook for me; this iteration of a similar ingredient list hits much closer to the mark. Here again it is a Latakia-forward mixture presented with Katerini concoctions and stoved tobaccos, but with more variety and, for my money, more interest. From the tin: A mellow, sweet mixture of Bright, Red, and Stoved Virginia offers the exceptional base for smokey Latakia, floral Kentucky, spice of Stoved Katerini and the ambrosial berry and spice of Katerini Perique. The result is a harmony of flavor in perfect balance. The bouquet in the tin is tart, heathery, and leathery, in equal proportion. The aroma is dry and smoky with clear clay overtones and, as advertised, faint berry notes from the tin. In the bowl the sweetness sneaks in immediately, displaying a wonderful synergy between the Katerini Perique (Periquini? Katerique?) and the Virginias, offering a flavor unique and quite apart from the usual raisiny range commonly found in Virginia / Perique meldings. Conversely, the Latakia’s smoky, burning-rubber character is also influenced by the Katerini, directing it toward a very pinyon-esque range of aroma that lingers distinctly the room note afterward. Speaking of room note, it can become rather tart after repeated bowls—advise any expected visitors that no, there isn’t a diesel fire in your house, you’re just savoring your time with a new blend. It’s offered as a tight 50g crumble cake, easily broken apart for preparation. As if it needed any more curb appeal, every 10th tin of the series includes a challenge coin featuring the tin’s artwork inside, and this was a lucky tin. It’s a great way to have fun with the series, makes a great addition to the random tchotchkes adorning one’s desk, and serves as a very tactile fidget toy that doubles as a brand reminder—is it time to stock up again? In my testing it seemed at its best in a wider, shallower bowl; the ember was easier to tend, breath pacing allowed a fuller flavor, and it didn’t veer too strongly to the tarry tones that Lat can have. Of the flavors there were many—often varying from bowl to bowl, and very dependent on accompanying beverage or previous meal, it seems. It’s an unfocused blend, but not to its detriment in this regard; it had a very consistent overall tone, with each bowl eliciting some new and interesting flavor moments—my notes are all over the spectrum, with observations like popcorn, maple bacon, charred cardboard, the aforementioned diesel fumes, burnt beef ends, dried silage, musky oak, swamp water (peaty!), and dried vodka. Appreciably, those who enjoy Latakia will read all these descriptors and understand that none of them are negative. It was so fun to keep chasing these disparate flavors that I did incur some mouth fatigue, just this side of bite, after rapidly repeated bowls. Slow smoking and pacing are advised, as the nicotine was mild enough to not discourage such practice. Overall, Episode II is a blend with so many interesting things going on that it warrants another taste after it has some age on it. My hope is that with some time in the tin, the Latakia notes will tone down on the dryness and the Viriginia / Katerique sweetness will amplify, with all the other cacophonous notes finding their home in the in-between spaces comfortably. Per’s experiments with these new treatments of old leaf are yielding remarkable results, and I look forward to seeing them in more blends in the future, and indeed more innovation of this sort in the tobacco world in general. Tasting something so similar, yet so slightly different, from what’s been available before is what this market needs. Seattle Pipe Club Hogshead: Bourbon Barrel Aged Review Our second summer blockbuster is SPC’s Hogshead: Bourbon Barrel Aged. Somewhat akin to that other summer blockbuster, Deadpool & Wolverine, this one is a cut above its predecessor. Thank you ladies and gentlemen, I’ll be here all week, tip your waitress… Vintage Virginia tobacco cultivated from around the world aged in a bourbon barrel for 30 days. The tobacco is then pressed and cut for a unique and one of a kind smoking experience. Well at least they didn’t prattle on with the ad copy and let the blend speak for itself. Veering a hard left from the boisterous melange of the Pipe Force, this iteration of Hogshead is a dead simple straight Virginia blend of the same 10-year-old red & orange used in the prior, this time presented in thickly-sliced pressed flakes, aged in bourbon barrels. Deceptively simple, that is—the flavors of this blend are robust and varied, punching above their weight class for being confined to the comparatively narrow range of “just Virginia”. The first […]
This is going to be one of those friendly chats between friends. That’s you and me, pipe smokers of the realm. As I have mentioned before in praising pipe puffers: we are the mind workers of the world! “Friends” is the word of the day. One of my besties is my pipe. I take it everywhere. On a visit to Rowan Oak, way back there, the beautiful country home of legendary author William Faulkner, I was stunned almost silly walking through the rooms where the Nobel Laureate author lived and wrote of his extensive southern view. I have described this adventurous trip to Oxford, Mississippi, before. A well-smoked pipe was stuffed inside a tweed coat pocket with his favorite blend of the day. The tobacco was dried inside the bowl almost to the consistency of dust. The coat was draped over a wooden peg in a hallway as if awaiting Faulkner’s return. That scene inspired Pundit to emulate one of his favorite authors, beginning a habit that continues: pipes go with me everywhere, in coat pockets, bags, satchels, etc. Pipes are especially important in my outdoor jaunts when the sun also rises. Mr. Hemingway was an occasional pipe smoker, great angler, and outdoorsman, in addition to being rather good at penning stories. Recently reading about environmental concerns, which involve us pipe smokers since our beloved hobby is earth-bound in agriculture and nature, I encountered a beautiful line by writer, Krista Langlois, in Sierra, the magazine of The Sierra Club. She authored a story about sitting off in the distance and observing the Sleeping Ute Mountains near Cortez, Colo. The mountain, she says, is sacred and managed by the Ute Mountain Tribe. She longed to hike the mountain but had to settle for taking in the view, just as we must do as well when following the sun and just stopping long enough to light a pipe and take in the natural beauty. “But as a mountain, I will forever look at and never touch, it becomes something else entirely: a physical reminder of all I can never understand or conquer, and all I can learn by sitting still,” she wrote. Isn’t this what our pipes are for? To help us understand and perhaps conquer all we can by just being still and observing. Puffing our pipes and seeing a full moon in August. It’s known as the Sturgeon Moon, a time when Native Americans knew freshwater fish was abundant in nearby waters. Or, like the great Yogi Berra, the New York Yankees baseball philosopher/manager (who loved his cigars) once said, “You can observe a lot by watching.” And, just guessing, but that might have been time after a large sturgeon catch to pull out the pipe and smoke some of that native tobacco Native American tribes fostered. Not to belabor this point too much, but in California where sequoia trees are sacred to tribes, a certain rare tobacco plant is a coveted reward found near the giant trees. It is said tribes will trade buckets of fish for a small bag of the rare tobacco. A note now about an upcoming pipe show I know is already on many a calendar, if not hotel rooms already rented. The Conclave of Richmond Pipe Smokers hosts its 40th anniversary Expo Sept. 13-15. This year’s event coincides with the legendary Sutliff Tobacco Company’s 175 anniversary. It will be staged at the Keystone Truck and Tractor Museum in Colonial Heights, Virginia. You can check out all the details at PipesMagazine, which has already noted the CORPS Expo, at CORPS and Sutliff. One of my fondest memories is going to the historic City of Richmond event and seeing not only zillions of pipes on display but also people who love pipes and love talking about them. I listened to CORPS’s founding member Linwood Hines during that trek and knew I had found kindred souls. For a terrific story on Linwood Hines, you need to read Chuck Stanion’s piece in The Daily Reader at SmokingPipes.com. Not only is this a superb story on a legend in Pipedom but also you might learn a thing or three about some nifty tobacco blends from Linwood. Ok, on to Pipe Smokers of the Past. Some large names from the movie and theater world; literature; and the man who gave us the telephone. Alfred Joseph Hitchcock, born Aug. 13, 1899, died April 29, 1980. Gwyllyn Samuel Newton “Glenn” Ford, a Canadian American actor, born May 1, 1916, died Aug. 30, 2006. Henry Jaynes Fonda, born May 16, 1905, died Aug. 12, 1982. Bennett Alfred Cerf, born May 25, 1898, died Aug. 27, 1971. Alexander Graham Bell, born March 3, 1847, died Aug. 2, 1922. Alfred Tennyson, born Aug. 6, 1809, died Oct. 6, 1892. If you saw the Hitchcock movie “The Birds,” you know what a “murder” of crows can do to your nerves. The master of scary suspense, Hitchcock is reported to have enjoyed Dunhill pipes and tobaccos, along with his love of cigars. With that said, I’ll take my backyard birds with a nerve-settling pipe. And I can’t depart without a quote from artist and pipe smoker Vincent van Gogh. He wrote in an 1875 letter to his brother, Theo, describing his pipe as an “old, trusty friend, and I imagine we’ll never part again.” Amen, brother.
Mr. Lyles you know too much, please report to your nearest “education” camp for reprogramming.
Great article. Thanks
Bravo, Carter. A great look inside the lies. I was once told by someone who worked in the records department of a large hospital that whenever someone snuffed it, if the deceased had ever been a smoker, it went in the roles as a tobacco related death, even if the ultimate cause was a gunshot, car accident or suicide. I have no idea how true or, if it is, how widespread this would be, but it would certainly skew the statistics a little bit, don’t you think?
But, the public will believe what they want to believe, and if false statistics based on questionable data can support their dislike of something, they’ll be all over it. Try making BBQs illegal because of the carcinogenic effects of the resulting nitrosamines, and see how much support THAT gets.
Thanks for raising my blood pressure a bit. I was feeling a little too calm today.
Greg, I cant speak to widespread trends, but I can say 100% this was the case with my wifes father. He died at 76 years old after a series of strokes, and because he was a smoker the cause of death was officially listed as tobacco use. I cant find any reason for it, except to skew the numbers of tobacco related death.
Things like this just make me angry. We are losing sight of the bigger picture and have skewed the very foundation upon which this nation was built. Great article. Keep on keeping on.
It’s been many years since ANY Death Certificate in the USA listed the cause of death as “natural causes” or “old age”… I think those became invalid entries in the mid 1950’s….
Great Article Carter!
Methinks in some cases national (U.S.) figures have been confused with global figures.
The attacks on tobacco remain idiocy, however, so the thrust of the arguments is correct.
1.) “Smoking Kills People.” So, let’s target Al-Quaidda infestations and carpet-bomb them with cartons of US-made cigarettes, thereby supporting American agriculture and showing our trust in Cancer Society claims.
2.) If pipe smokers are 2% of all nicotine addicts, how many deaths am I responsible for? I want to paint a “Kill” flag on my car door for each one that can be confirmed to my tobacco consumption.
3.) “You and the Cancer Society can pry my pipe from my cold dead hands.”
Good article as always, Carter. Unfortunately a rebuttal of fact and logic is futile against a crusade of behavioral control. Statistically speaking, that is.
A man is offered a cigarette prior to facing a firing squad. He smokes the cigarette, takes his place against the wall, and is summarily dispatched. His death was recorded as “smoking related”.
This is one of the more poorly written articles I’ve ever read in a commercial publication. Organization is nonexistent, reasoning is opaque, and the conclusions don’t necessarily follow from the facts presented. Mr. Lyles, please don’t waste my time reading your rough drafts, I don’t have the patience to connect your dots with my lines of conjecture.
Wow Cortez. That was harsh. Who peed in your Cheerios?
Oh, I was just workin’ myself up to do a review of Mixture 79. 🙂
I believe it was H.G. Wells that says in one of his writings that the devil likes to quote both scripture and statistics. Let’s face it though gentlemen the tobacco industry has been just as good at twisting the facts as the anti-smoking establishment. They apparently have learned from the same political and scientific hacks. Actually I think I’ll write an article, Why Tobacco is Good for You, and publish all the related joys and pleasures of the ancient weed for everyone to ponder. Our world is full of itself.
For a good read, take on How to Lie with Statistics by Darrell Huff.
As an advocate of smokers’ rights, and in general, freedom from excessive government intrusion upon personal lifestyle choices, I believe our interests are best served by avoiding the obfuscating fog of tiresome statistical arguments and the occasional snide rejoinder (ahem).
.
After all, such an approach is based implicitly on the premise that the most salient studies, or the most exhausting litany of them, will win the day — and that’s not the issue here! What is at stake is personal freedom; and to me, the most promising approach is to champion our nation’s founding principle.
.
The notion is so basic there should be no debate. Yet, the ongoing controversy testifies to the inherent fragility of that freedom threatened by our opposition, which is daily growing in political strength and tyranny. Remember, human rights were presumed, and the U.S. Constitution was constructed not to enumerate them, but to limit government intrusion. This should be our thrust.
As always,your spot on in your analyses and conclusions. You think like a scientist and write the truth as you see it.
I sometimes feel compelled to write a comment whenever I see one of your treatises even thouth I have come to realize that you have the fire in your belly and would write the truth even if no one ever read it.
We need more like you.
cortezattic – The Constitution was constructed to limit government intrusion for some groups – certainly not for slaves or women – but fashions seem to keep changing with regard to whose human rights the founding principles include.
In the fist segment of the PBS Prohibition series one of the activist leaders claimed that just one drop of intoxicating liquor could destroy an entire family.
This week the government is giving out $103 million in grants for prevention. Prevention is the bread and butter for some groups. As for the rest, prevention makes patients of us all.
Maybe, someday, they’ll leave us alone. Good article.
@Nameshy: Point well taken: principles have never gotten in the way of legislating fashion. One hopes for improvement though; and maybe the slavery, equal protection and suffrage amendments (13 – 15, and 19) are evidence of it.
Does anyone know where we can get the true truth and the real facts? I mean this in all seriousness. I had my first pipe in the late 1970s and was so besieged with well-intentioned concerns for my health that I put it away for the last 30 years. Last year I finally said to heck with it… and started collecting and smoking pipes (again). I’ve had so much enjoyment from the aromas, the feel of various briar textures in the hand, the happy peaceful contemplative mood that comes with it, etc etc etc… and then I go to the movies and see a “commercial” (already irked because I was already paying for NOT commercials) with terrible pictures of surgically traumatized “smokers” from some organization with “truth” in its name. It DOES scare me. The one voice in my head says, “Jer… you’re 55… the time when most intelligent people quit smoking as opposed to take it up. What are you doing to yourself?” I have held the hands of people dying from lung cancer, emphysema, and various other smoking attributable causes and I surely don’t want to risk that. But I also take seriously the positive perspectives of so many of the contributors here. What I would really like is to base my understanding and lifestyle decisions NOT of beliefs and feelings, but on valid statistical risk factors and medically sound information. Where are these things? HELP!
Jerwynn, your question is a good one. Tobacco in cigarettes is normally inhaled. Tobacco smoked in a pipe is almost impossible to inhale. The fact that for hundreds of years pipe smoking was very popular but the major diseases that are associated with smoking only came into existence when machines were invented that could mass-produce cigarettes. This should be documentation of the most solid scientific kind. The evidence is further confirmed by the government’s own mortality tables, which illustrate the vast gap between cigarette smoking and pipe smoking.
A glance at the results of the first Surgeon General’s report were so positive that he himself switched to a pipe. Since that time they attempted to build up the figures as best they could, but without much statistical significance. Currently they discovered that some of what they had thought was a tobacco problem turned out to be HPV.
Nameshy, thank you very much! I really appreciate your response. In the last year since returning to the pipe, every time I go into a pipe-store or meet a pipe-ster or pipe-maker, I want to ask if they have ever known any other real pipe-smoker that actually got mouth/throat/esophageal/etcetcetc cancer. I never do because I wouldn’t want to bring sad recollections to anyone who might have lost a friend to that. But then it occurs to me, so many of these people, who have been happily piping away all their adult lives, are my age or older and are obviously still living and happy about it! Hmmmmmmmmm… I must have another pipe to ponder the mystery of it!
Jerwynn: I was just having those thoughts, although I have been smoking a pipe for some time now.
I was at the VA this week for cholestrol medication review and of course the ususal questions come up. What do you eat? How much, when etc? Then the unevitable ones come. Do you drink alcohol? I say no because I was the guy that could not drink responsibably and havn,t had a drop for 10 yrs. Then the “how about tobacco use”? I said I smoke a pipe. She wasn’t puzzled or anything. Then looks at my file and said that with my risk factors I would be 30% likly to have a heart attack within the next 10yrs. I called her about smoking a pipe and not cigarettes and how they add chemicals in cigarettes to keep people addicted and not inhaling a pipe. She said it didn’t matter and that even if you only smoked 1 cigarette a day you are still considered a risk factor because of it. Then asked me if I needed assistance with a stop smoking program LOL!!!
My mother died of a heart attack at 56. They told me that was a risk to me as well and told me it did not matter that my mother was more a less mentally ill and laid on the couch all day, everyday and didn’t do anything except eat potato chips and never left the house.
Great article, I needed to see this and be reaffirmed of what tobacco nazis are up to….Joe
Jerwynn: I was just having those thoughts, although I have been smoking a pipe for some time now.
I was at the VA this week for cholestrol medication review and of course the ususal questions come up. What do you eat? How much, when etc? Then the unevitable ones come. Do you drink alcohol? I say no because I was the guy that could not drink responsibably and havn,t had a drop for 10 yrs. Then the “how about tobacco use”? I said I smoke a pipe. She wasn’t puzzled or anything. Then looks at my file and said that with my risk factors I would be 30% likly to have a heart attack within the next 10yrs. I called her about smoking a pipe and not cigarettes and how they add chemicals in cigarettes to keep people addicted and not inhaling a pipe. She said it didn’t matter and that even if you only smoked 1 cigarette a day you are still considered a risk factor because of it. Then asked me if I needed assistance with a stop smoking program LOL!!!
My mother died of a heart attack at 56. They told me that was a risk to me as well and told me it did not matter that my mother was more a less mentally ill and laid on the couch all day, everyday and didn’t do anything except eat potato chips and never left the house.
Great article, I needed to see this and be reaffirmed of what tobacco nazis are up to….Joe
As far as I’m concerned, Tobacco smoking IS protected under the First Amendment. Smoking has been a form of expression for thousands of years, and never really hurt anyone. . .untill now!! Hmmm! It’s not the Tobacco. . .It’s been since the advent of the diesel engine.