Packaging- A Tobacco Company’s Dilemma
-
Kevin Godbee - Sep 7, 2012
- 5 min read
Russ Ouellette
You’d think that, by now, I would know better than to urinate into the wind, but, what the hell. I’m bringing up a subject that is a constant source of consternation for us- packaging. Let me begin by saying that the problem is partially one of my own making by wanting to please more people rather than standing firm on a decision. When we started making the Hearth & Home tobaccos, they were all in a bulk format. After a while, I received comments and requests to tin our blends, as some folks don’t want to buy loose tobacco and jar it. I understood, but I had some angst in making the choice (with Scott’s okay, of course) because there would be the inevitable comparisons- were the two versions the same (in our case, yes); and why the big price difference? The added labor, container, labeling and shipping costs mean that tinned tobacco has to be, of necessity, more expensive. But as far as the components go, there’s no difference in quality. Yet some people will insist that there are noticeable contrasts. This is unavoidable as bulk is exposed to open air more, and tins have additional fermentation occurring. But in an effort to reach the broadest audience, we went both ways.
Later on, when I was able to develop some new blends that had higher component costs due to the quality and rarity, I wanted to only offer them in tins, as I felt that the integrity of the blends depended upon it. I also dared to try a new concept- pressing by using vacuum-sealing. What happened next was something I should have been prepared for; people asked for the tinned blends to be available in bulk because the tins were too expensive. I also had people ask for smaller packages of the vacuumed tobaccos. Now I had a couple of real dilemmas- do I make these "special" blends less so by selling them loose, and do I increase labor costs by making smaller vacuum-pressed packs? Since our creed is to make customers happy, we gave in for the most part.
Why is this such an issue? Because there are lots of different attitudes. Some people are extremely particular about the flavor and aroma of their tobaccos and they feel that there’s more consistency and flavor development in tinned tobaccos. I can’t, and won’t, argue this point. It’s a fact. When tobaccos are sold in bulk, the very moment that the bag is opened to weigh out the first sale, the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) begin to dissipate. This doesn’t happen with tins until the end consumer cracks it open. Also, in the closed environment, the anaerobic fermentation helps to bring out elements that don’t develop in bulk. But is there enough difference to justify the price gradient? Well, that’s up to the consumer to decide. Sure, it’s a pain to make the same blends both ways, but we reach more people, so we decided to do it. I am not, by any means, making a judgment about other companies who choose a different path- it’s all based on the philosophy of the company, and the economics. Part of the reason we can get away with our choice is because we’re small enough to work with lesser quantities. When making hundreds of pounds at a time, a dissimilar mindset has to be used. At the same time, when working with larger batches, the price can come down, and we’re not geared up for that.
From a personal viewpoint, when I’ve come up with something that I feel really strongly about and the product suffers a bit, in my opinion, by being served up in bulk, it’s disappointing. But I can’t argue affordability. Hence the reason for writing this.
If someone has tried one of our original blends in bulk, but felt that the flavor was lacking, I would encourage him/her to try a tin. The additional marrying time and the fermentation may make the blend "pop". If a person has smoked one of our Marquee Series tobaccos and enjoyed it, but find it too pricey, give the bulk version a whirl. There will be a difference, no doubt, but maybe not enough to be off-putting.
Here’s one major difference from our perspective- since most of what we sell, we sell through our own site, we’re not asking other companies to carry so many different forms and sizes. If the larger makers were to do this, a lot of retailers would have to throw their hands in the air and yell, "Enough!" Just think about a supermarket chain facing the fact that there are now 10 kinds of Special K cereal. A store only has so much shelf space, and the original version has sold well, but what do you eliminate to take on more flavors. So the larger manufacturers of pipe tobacco have to think about the possibility of overloading their retail partners.
As with so many issues in this business, there aren’t any pat answers, and every maker has to evaluate their circumstances. Where will we go in the future? My crystal ball is particularly cloudy, so I don’t have a clue, but we’ll take everything on a case-by-case basis. But part of what makes this a magical industry is that we’re now small enough to pay close attention to what our retail partners and our end-users want. The beauty of this is that you’re the winners.
Despite all the doom and gloom, I still feel positive about the future of pipe smoking. Of course, things can change, but I think we’ve finally reached the point where the politicians and policy makers are beginning to hear the gigantic *yawn* when they bring up another attack against our intrepid little band. In the meantime, we and our friendly competitors are going to find ways to give you what you want, and isn’t that really what it’s all about? Now, what are your thoughts?
|
Russ Ouellette is the blender/creator of the Hearth & Home series of tobaccos for Habana Premium Cigar Shoppe and www.pipesandcigars.com in Albany, NY. He has been a pipe smoker and blender for over 30 years, and enjoys feedback from the pipe smoking public. You can reach Russ at russo@pipesandcigars.com or by calling 1-800-494-9144 on Monday, Wednesday and Thursday from 9 am to 5 pm and Friday from 1 pm to 5 pm. |
Written by Kevin Godbee
35 Responses
Smokingpipes.com Updates
6 Fresh Estate Pipes |
3 Fresh Lasse Skovgaard Pipes |
12 Fresh Vauen Pipes |
12 Fresh Nørding Pipes |
36 Fresh AKB Meerschaum Pipes |
Recent Posts
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 634! Our featured interview on tonight’s show is with Warren Ertle. Warren is an extremely accomplished musician with a PhD in music. He started early as a percussionist in sixth grade. Later his grandmother got him a cheap Casio keyboard which he taught himself to play. He started playing in blues bands in high school, and has been a pianist with jazz big bands for years. Even though he was already a professional musician, he took his first real piano lesson when he enrolled in college with his studies in classical music. He is of course a pipe smoker. At the top of the show we will have an Ask the Tobacco Blender segment with Jeremy Reeves. Jeremy is the Head Blender at Cornell & Diehl, which is one of the most popular boutique pipe tobacco companies in the USA.
Soon now, supposedly, our neighborhoods will shift from grinning pumpkins, skeletons in various assortments, and zombies dashing about to pretty reindeer, angels, and flashing lights illuminating homes with sparkling stars and laughing, scurrying Santas. But, lest we forget, there is the turkey season, fancy pie aromas wafting from kitchens, and a national pardon of a big Tom Turkey. Remember, now, that only one of these holiday personalities is a pipe smoker. And that is the hefty, bearded fellow in a bright red suit sitting in a sleigh with a herd of deer hitched up and ready to streak across the globe, bringing tidings of joy and many presents. Ok, the scene is set for the next couple of months, right? So, before we get too far off the beaten path, let’s just take a deep breath of fresh autumn air, shall we? Ahh. That’s better, isn’t it? What’s got the Pundit in a snit is not all the Halloween spooks who came a-jostling for candy. Or the wild turkeys gobbling in the backwoods or all the fuss and feathers over the big one—Christmas. No, it is that we might need to take note of all the little things that mean so much to us. Like a good sunrise (seriously, Pundit has not gone all Pollyanna.) Mayhaps we need to appreciate more of what we have than what we have not. Or something like that. Like, a good pipe in the morning with coffee as the dawn brings us coolish weather now that we have flipped the calendar to autumn. But it also brings beautiful leaves that have become a spectacle of technicolor in the wind. It is the little things. The rereading of an enjoyable book and finding something you did not see or learn in the first go-round. Or a stunning phrase you commit to memory with the re-read, while smoking that favorite pipe. And you notice a superior puff that just seems to be different. It’s in the air and the seasons of meaningful little things. It’s aromatic! Or perhaps it is that sense of satisfaction knowing and appreciating you made it to another day. With the world in a kind of rinse-and-repeat history, reminiscent of a Shakespearean play, it is perhaps a good moment to remember some of Pipedom’s philosophers whose cogent thoughts brought light to clear a path in the mists of confusion and confounding opinions. Ok. No gloom and doom. Just some down-home thoughts. Think of times in the past when history was running off the rails. It took our pipe-smoking thinkers (the mind workers of the world) to speak of better pathways to more light. Think for a moment, with a pipe in hand, these wizards of the world and word: Albert Einstein, J. R.R. Tolkien, Mark Twain, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Edwin Hubble, Bertrand Russell, C. S. Lewis, and Jean-Paul Sartre. All learned and enlightened. They offered wisdom instead of storms of meaningless roads to nowhere. All while smoking their pipes! Maybe especially with the help of their pipes in the art of thinking and philosophy. Recall the words of Mr. E=MC2 when he said, “I believe that pipe smoking contributes to a somewhat calm and objective judgment in all human affairs.” Amen and amen! Dealing with world-rattling events takes a calm and objective view of things, to the Pundit’s way of summing it up. You just don’t go messing around with quantum physics without a calm and objective approach, methinks. Or as the extraordinary physicist Robert Oppenheimer said after he and a team in the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos Labs developed a way to split atoms into bombs during World War II. “I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds,” said Oppenheimer referring to the development of the first nuclear bombs dropped on Japan. It must be pointed out that Oppenheimer was more of a cigarette smoker than a pipe smoker. Nonetheless, pipes were part of his personality. Now, if you have read some of the great authors of the past and present, their pipes were always nearby. Reading Sir Arthur Conan Doyle can be a three-pipe problem at times. S. Lewis and Jean-Paul Sartre require time with your pipes to reflect on the existential problems and solutions these authors provide in learned novels and other narratives. Or take Edwin Hubble and Bertrand Russell, philosophers of another world. Pipes are required for reading. The quantum lode of ideas Pundit is attempting to sort out is that our pipes are relaxing and stimulate our thoughts and creativity. Especially in these last months of the year. Many times Pundit has had that light bulb flick on while smoking my beloved pipes. And friends in Pipedom, it ain’t easy to turn on the lights in Pundit’s rock pit head. Now it’s time for a quote from a Pipe Smoker of the Past. Shelby Foote was born Nov. 17, 1916, in Greenville, Miss., and died June 27, 2005, in Memphis, Tenn. A fact is not a truth until you love it—Shelby Foote. A parting thought: It is said that famed Southern author William Faulkner carried a packed pipe in a coat pocket wherever he went. That’s one effective way to deal with workday conflicts and confusion. A calm and objective judgment in our everyday human affairs, as the quantum man said.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 633. Our featured guest tonight is Jon David Cole. JD is the Owner/Tobacconist at The Country Squire in Jackson, MS, and the accompanying online store. We’ll have JD and Brian talking about what’s new at the store and in the business in general. At the top of the show, Brian will discuss tobacco growing, what happens to the leaf, and provide updated information on where tobacco is being gown today. Tobacco production originated in the United States and we were once the #1 producer. It’s quite different now.
Well there’s nothing like a touch of the plague to usher in the changing season. Leaving the airport just when the first advertisements for all things pumpkin spice began to appear—lattes, muffins, shampoos, trash bags, and myriad other concoctions—so, too, my ability to breathe freely disappeared. The unfortunate side effect of losing one’s sense of taste and smell for weeks is the utter inability to enjoy tobacco. Not that I consider myself an expert on anything but my own tastes, but be forewarned that this review was made with mildly impugned sensory equipment. Just when a comforting pipe was most needed, its comfort was denied. Be that as it may, the road to recovery found me limping along on one lung this past month, trying to wrest the particulars of two blends on offer from Sutliff: the latest 175th Anniversary blend, Silver Quarter, as well as their spooky seasonal Maple Shadows II. Silver Quarter is a new style on offer from Sutliff, their first coin-cut blend. Naturally a Virginia-Perique, it is enhanced with a traditional core of black Cavendish. In the tin it holds much promise, with a lightly bready and very woody, if ever-so-slightly sour, aroma. After some time acclimating to air, the bouquet softens further and offers hints of the burley with some chocolaty notes wafting through the more dominant dry grassy aspect. The tin art is of a coin-style bas-relief bust, presumably of a founding Sutliff brother, à la The Old Boss On the reverse of the tin we find the blend’s description: Reflecting on Sutliffs 175 years of tobacco excellence, we came across a brand that embodies true value, SILVER QUARTER. This name pays homage to Sutliffs roots, the legacy of two brothers who popularized pipe smoking in the burgeoning mining society of San Francisco. We celebrate this heritage with a coin cut composed of the finest African Virginias, complemented by a core of Perique and Black Cavendish. The tin notes are, forgive the pun, on the nose for a good VaPer blend: mild tart sweetness peeking out from behind dried hay and slight chocolate undertones, with a lightly tannic finish of weathered oak. It is always a joy to prepare a coin cut, my preference being to put a few in my palm and vigorously warm my hands together to fully break them apart. These well-formed discs pack and light easily, and smoke with little prodding to the end of the bowl. For technical points it scores well—it smokes light, and it’s easy to tend the ember. While it gets sharp after a few quick bowls, pacing should be heeded to easily smoke down to the heel without inviting bite. Of the flavor, though, I am left a bit wanting. There are tart and high notes aplenty, but very little of the lemony citrus I would anticipate, as well as scant midtones; they tend more toward the red wine-vinegary and sour. The flavors are muted, also, lacking the sweetness and piquancy of other marques—the small measure of Perique tickles the nose now and again with peppery hints, and there is a smidge of a deeper sweetness to be found in the Cavendish from puff to puff, but overall it lacks some dynamism. The Virginias, to my palate, come off a bit on the dry side, and here they dominate the blend. The aftertaste and mouthfeel are neutral, again evincing more of the dry, woody, tartly tannic end of the spectrum. The blend has plenty of polish, but not enough depth or richness (*yet) to make it a standout. Here, comparisons are inevitable: Luxury Bullseye Flake has more sweetness, both from its Virginia as well as its Cavendish, and a better finish; Davidoff is similar but with a pronounced umami that is absent here; as for Escudo, I haven’t had any fresh tins lately so it would be unfair to compare. While it rates as a solid, fairly mild smoke, particularly to lovers of the genre, it does not surprise with any exceptional flavors. To be fair, all the boxes have been checked for the blend to benefit from some real aging, and it would be worth checking in on this after a couple of years sealed away. I’ve set half my tin aside to sample again in a month or two, in case I’m merely suffering from the lingering effects of parosmia, and will amend this review in that case. Maple Shadows II, on the other hand, made up for the weeks of sniffling and sneezing I’d endured. Offered in a full 8 ounce tin with delightfully spooky Halloween art, it’s (hopefully) enough to last through the season. Somehow I had missed this last year, so it’s a real pleasure to get some in my candy bucket this year. As the chilling winds of autumn draw eerie prattle from contorted, deciduous limbs, we find ourselves possessed by the spirit of the season. Bewitched by a dissonant charm, we’ve created Maple Shadows. In a season that is defined by the unlikely harmony of treats and frights, we’ve joined the enchanting sweetness of maple with the earthy spice of Dark Fired Kentucky for a smoking experience that captures the senses with an otherworldly fusion of flavor. This may be the best aromatic blend Sutliff’s ever made—and they make a ton of them. First off, it’s not overbearing in the least—quite the opposite, it is also one of the more restrained aromatics they’ve ever made, with a clear but very light topping that melds oh-so-well with their choice Kentucky added to the mix. Opening the tin, the sweet maple is up front and center, but so too is the must of fallen leaves, bready pie crusts, and a crackling fire in the hearth—a perfect invocation of Herbstdüfte in a can. Packing best in an open and capacious bowl, the flavoring is subtle, and recedes to the background while puffing. With a sweet coffee or tea to accompany, the aftertaste of the maple is reinvigorated on the palate […]
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 632. Our featured guest on tonight’s show is the host of the Pipe & Tamper Podcast, Mike Murphy. Brian and Mike will have an extended chat revolving around the days before, during and after the Las Vegas International Pipe Show. We will hear about their travels to the show and the anxiety of Hurricane Milton bearing down on Florida at the same time while running a show and not knowing if your house is going to be there when you get home. In the end, the show went great and our homes survived, although many others in Florida were not so lucky. We’ll have clips from the show, and shoutouts to other podcasts and vlogs that were broadcasting from the pipe show.
Vegas Baby The show started out strong on the 14th floor hospitality suites hosted by the Vegas Pipe Show and Smoking Pipes as well as room hopping to carvers, estate sellers, and vendors to pre-game for the festivities. If you’re interested in what that looks like I’ll refer you to last years pipe show round up. I circled with Brian Levine to get the totals in comparison to last year: This year’s show numbers: 108 Exhibitor tables, 445 attendees, 3,250 Raffle Tickets, 100ish dinners, 172 Rooms in the Hotel. Last year, by comparison, 107 exhibitor tables, 425 attendees, 2,200 raffle tickets, 104 dinners, and 175 rooms on Friday and Saturday nights. We were at capacity, basically, when it came to vendor tables and the dinner, so there is no physical room for growth at this point except for attendees. That said, we filled that smoking lounge to the brim. New Carvers Spotlight Garret Woo (Pipes by Woo) How long have you been carving? Garret: I’ve been carving since 2021, and I’m guessing your next question is probably how’d you get started carving? James: Yes. Garret: In 2021 I took a break from my full time job – that included machining and assembly work and I thought maybe it was time I made something that I would like and I started looking at youtube and Instagram and putting together my shop. I did struggle on the stems to start and there was a lot of failure at the beginning. James: How many pipes have you made so far? Garret: I number my pipes, so I just finished up 186. James: What is your favorite shape you’ve been making? Garret: I really dig Canadians and pipes with longer shanks and lovat Canadian blends. I like to play with different shapes of stems on the longer shanked pipes. The billiard would be my go-to shape but I want to learn more techniques on freehanded shapes. I like to put brass and copper adornments on my pipes with my machining background it helps. James: What is the craziest thing you’ve seen at this show? Garret: The first thing that comes to mind is the table over there with C-Pipes with the shapes and the size and petiteness and the intricate details they did. You can check out what Garret is working on by going to his Instagram. Stefan Cashwell James: how long have you been carving? Stefan: about 3 years. James: What’s the craziest thing you’ve seen at the show? Stefan: The Adam Davidson pipe with the clear shape and the bamboo—I don’t know if it’s 3D printed or what, but it’s amazing. James: What’s your favorite shape to do? Stefan: That’s a tough question. I think they’re all the same shape, but what’s fascinating is that Dublin, volcano, and blowfish are all the same depending on how you turn them. Playing with that, with all its variations, is a lot of fun. My favorite accent to use is also horn; it’s finicky, but it’s a great accent on pipes. You can check out Stefan’s work on his Instagram. Science: Meet Pipes I chatted with Chris from the San Diego Pipe Club; he started off doing stem replacements for estate pipes but also improved the airflow. James: How are you doing 3d printing? What is the thought process? Chris: It’s a 3D-printed pipe with a briar insert. The design is a calabash meets a Peterson system meets a metal Falcon/Kirsten radiator style. It is a bottom draft smoking bowl like a radiator like those metal pipes. The inside chamber is a calabash. The stummel and accent rings in the stems are all 3d printed. The insert is briar, olive wood, or I have the potential to use meerschaum as well. This idea came about through the San Diego Pipe Club, wanting to see if we could 3D print a pipe and being curious about the technology; I have a printer and design ability, so here we are. James: What’s the type of plastic you’re using? Chris: It’s all PLA plastic, a renewable potato starch plastic that is food-safe. The stummels are printed with a plastic that has wood in it 40% wood fiber, bamboo, rosewood, ebony, redwood, and walnut are the woods I’m printing. For the accent rings I just got a new material that I’m printing that has 40% copper, so its real metal that you can sand, and polish the same as wood filament. The stems are 3d printed as well. The concept is renewable and cheap from a production standpoint, with the ability to make a very high quality smoking pipe based on the experience. By combining the calabash system pipe and bottom draft hole and using 3d simulations to see airflow, I can see where I’m having eddies and ripples in my current, and see where my moisture and all the particles are dropping back out from a vapor to a liquid. Most people who have tried these say the stems are clean, and they don’t even have to run a pipe cleaner afterward because everything collects at the bottom. Chris has also been experimenting with color-changing plastics so you can see the hotspots. Chris said he was able to use this to slow down his cadence, which, of course, could mean you could get a slow-smoke training pipe to teach yourself to perform better. If you’re interested in learning more or want to check one out, you can contact him on Instagram: Copper Beard Pipe Works The Negative Space The show was buzzing about one specific pipe, which had everyone guessing how it was made. I chatted with Adam Davidson briefly about it. James: How did this idea come to fruition? Adam Davidson: Smokingpipes.com had an expo back in August open to all of the makers they carry. The theme was to make a pipe utilizing bamboo. Given that the last time we had the expo I made a smooth Almond with three bamboo shanks, […]
You know, Russ, whatever you decide to do is going to bite you in the nether region anyway.You package one way, they want it the other way. You package it both ways and they want a guarantee that each package is identical to all of the others regardless of the fact that they haven’t been treated the same; this on got shipped to the cold North, that one got shipped to the dry hot desert southwest, another got lost on the postal dock in swamp-east Florida for a month. Obviously they are all going to have a taste that reflects the aging they have received. You lose!
Russ…I once only purchased bulk but now I only will buy tinned & for the reasons you mentioned. I enjoy looking in my pipe cabinet not only at my working collection but the stacks of tinned ‘baccy with their interesting artwork on the labels. In some cases the taste appeal may even be mis-statement [versus bulk] but the eye cannot be denied when the palate is in the discussion. Maybe I can compare it to having a well presented meal versus the same meal in a less appealing plate. Yep…I enjoy tins!
What ever you do, from a Coast Salish native American perspective.
If someone is not mad, you are doing it wrong. Our elder’s point is that you can’t please everyone.
Do what you do and do it well.
As a customer service rep, I bow to your logic and how you’ve handled the packaging of your products. I find no flaw in your approach to caving into the consumer’s demands and offering both bulk and tinned tobacco. I think it wise to leave it up to the consumer to think for themselves and decide what they like better. High quality taste at a moderate price, or slightly less high quality taste at rock bottom prices. I think it speak volumes for a company to let the consumer think for themselves a bit. Happy Smoking Russ.
I’ve been more into bulk lately, because it all ends up in jars anyway. I do like to buy the 8oz tins of my favorites, though.
Russ, I think you are making good calls as a whole.
One place that I do think needs improvement is in packaging design. The quality of graphic design in your labels and printing doesn’t begin to match the quality of the product. You need to engage a firm that understands consumer product packaging design for men. If we look at the cigar industry, they’ve gotten it right. Most of the pipe tobacco category has gotten it wrong. I’d like to see you lead in making your packaging as good as your product.
I can really feel your pain! It would be bad enough trying to make all ‘toilet tissue’ users happy (which includes everyone) but pipe smokers are a strange bunch and in small supply. I’m a happy smoker knowing there are folks like you willing to fight that battle. “Thank You for your Service Sir!”
Thanks for the column explaining your thoughts on this, Russ. Most enlightening.
Great article I really enjoyed hearing this issue from someone with a little more knowledge.
Thanks for all the feedback, folks. It makes me feel a little more comfortable with our choices.
Neill- Point well taken. If you look at our label for Cerberus, it’s a much better look than our previous ones. The earlier labels were designed by me with an entry-level publishing program. We now employ an incredibly talented graphic artist who will be designing all our labels going forward…thank God.
I’m glad you offer bulk packaging at a substantial savings. I don’t think my palate is sensitive enough to notice a difference from tinned offerings.
Some months ago, one of the H&H tins I purchased (H&H Landmark Series: Manor Heights, 1.5 oz., new to me) and noticed tobacco had stuck to the bottom of the tin and it appeared that rust was just starting to develop.
I jarred the tobacco, smoked it all and really enjoyed the blend, but was concerned enough about this to Email P&C and make note of it. I suggested using some form of paper insert in the tin, to protect the tobacco, might be a good idea.
I received a quick and courteous Email reply, thanking me for the input and noting that you (Russ) was out due to illness, but this would be brought up to you when you returned. I’d be interested in your comments on this.
I’m one of the few that are blessed with a local shop that carries a lot of your bulk blends. Getting a few ounces of Daybreak is just a few minutes drive from work for me. That being said, there are blends I don’t go through quick enough and the tin makes the most sense.
I’m glad you offer both options on your blends. For me it’s just a matter of how often I go through them. Daybreak is my morning smoke so I buy it in bulk. Magnum Opus is something I have as a special treat and 2 or 8 ounce tins work best.
To me, comparing the tin to bulk is worth it. Buying a tin, then 2-4 oz. of bulk and jarring it, is all part of the process of discovery. From there you can determine the nature of your next purchases.
Most of the tobacco we buy is relatively cheap pleasure, even the more premium blends.It often seems to me that, like in many other areas of life, people “know so much about tobacco” that they can’t hardly enjoy it anymore. Instead they fret and worry about things that are hardly important to the more insistent and persistent problems regarding the selection of either beer or whiskey to go along with the pipe.
Thanks for the great article. Tinned is a good option as long as 8 &/or 16 oz are also available besides the standard 1.5 or 2 oz – so that once i like something particularly, i can buy at lower rates. Your prices are very competitive & there are lots i want to try – so though its good that you are thinking, i am happy 🙂
I love the fact you offer your blends in tins, I always prefer to buy them over bulk. Also if your giving some as a gift to someone, tins are the only way to go. Cruedly drawn labels may appear vintage and may fool your users to think that they are getting an established blend 😉
OK Russ, nicely done. It comes down to business. Your business model appears not to be a low cost provider. You seem to be falling in line with the customer service model were you closely a line with the customer and that comes at a cost which you have mentioned and I sure there is more you have not. You also demonstrate certain business traits that somewhat a line you with being a differentiator – which means product that separate you from the pack. In business, I do not often see leader explain their position, as they are afraid to loss revenue. You have done a great job here and kept my respect even enhanced it. I will shift to tins as your edification has helped me to understand the difference. Thank you Sir.
Cerberus is a pretty cool looking tin. For the photo here, I just grabbed what I had around in my own personal stash.
You can see Cerberus here:
http://pipesandcigars.com/international.html
So what you’re saying is, this would probably be the wrong time to ask if you’re ever going to offer small sample sized portions of say Lakeland Brickle – so that I don’t have to buy a half pound just to find out if I’m going to like it?
(Sorry – couldn’t help myself…)
🙂
Elwin,
If you want to try Lakeland Brickle, just ask for a sample when you place an order with us. I’d love to offer the Brickles in smaller amounts, but the labor costs are really high with the time involved in vacuum sealing.
I’m under the impression that up until ten or so years ago the tobaccos I smoked from a can were somewhat more loosely packed and now are very much more tightly packed. The actual weight a can held didn’t change, but the size of the can became smaller. I think I understand the theory behind this compressing and why it was considered to be an improvement. But isn’t it also possible that in some ways the same blends weren’t a little better in the former packing method?
I’m disappointed that Mr. Ouelette hasn’t commented on my post here of 7 September.
I’m sorry I didn’t address your concern. Your idea is a good one, but the packaging is done for us by a manufacturer, and the way the tins are done is not something we control. I certainly will pass your thoughts along, but the ultimate decision is up to our partner. From what I’ve been told, the problem was with one batch of bottoms hat weren’t properly coated, and we have replaced any that people brought to our attention. Thankfully, there weren’t many. Please, if you ever have any problem with any product from us, let us know right away so we can replace it or otherwise satisfy you.
Russ
Russ, thanks for your reply to my concern.
As I open a smaller tin, I’m accustomed to leaving the tobacco in that tin when I plan to smoke it up in 3-4 weeks. Loved the Manor Heights and glad I caught the problem in my tin’s bottom in time! I plan to add another tin of that blend to an order soon since the problem’s been addressed and corrected. Thanks again for setting my mind at ease.
Good article and I totally agree with your concerns.
Russ,
One of the things I really love about you, Scotty, Bobby and the team at P&C is your like-mindedness about great service. As for tins verses bulk, I realized that there would be no possible way for me to consume all the baccy in my cellar in this lifetime, so now buying the tobacco in tins at least makes it easier for my wife to happily sell it off after my demise! LOL
Just a thought: There are foil sandwiched plastic bags that would probably cut down on the transmission of volatiles thru the bag and allow for vacuum sealing. This would allow the product to be kept under vacuum, until opened, like the tin. There may be some other problem that pops up with your packager but I would think it’s worth a quick look into. Just a thought. Thanks for the article! I’ll have to pick up a few tins to see the difference.
Actually, those mylar bags have been used by McClelland for some of their tobaccos, but they stopped using them about 4-5 years ago. I’ll have to ask Mike McNeil why they don’t use them anymore.
Russ
Iwan Ries uses the mylar bags with a ziplock seal. I had a few from the Chicago show.
Kevin, Do you notice any smell from the mylar bags or do you have them mixed with your other tobaccos. I usually leave my bulk in the bag it was packed in and put the whole thing in an apothicary jar. Our dollar store has some great jars that fit 4oz-6oz for $1 each. I think it is a Dollar General. The other place for cheep jars is The Christmas Tree Shop. If I’m not supposed to mention names then they’re just the dollar stores.
Whitecloud, I don’t recall any particular smell from the bags, but I do not have them anymore. I finished the tobacco and tossed them.
Rus,as Long as you make Larrys blend I dont care what you put it in,
Russ: I couldn’t help wondering if my observation of September 12th made any sense to you, or if it was simply not in the ballpark.
nameshy- You’re correct in your observation, at least in some cases, as the size of tins was reduced to decrease packaging and shipping costs. I don’t believe, however, that it has much impact on the tobacco. It’s possible that it could have some influence over how quickly it marries, but outside that, I don’t know if it would change anything else very much.
Russ
Thanks, Russ. I probably should have mentioned that I have almost always used blends that have had at least some latakia.