Taxing Tobacco Seems to Fashionable in California

Drucquers Banner

California legislators are grasping at tax straws that don’t exist as they seek to raise billions of dollars that don’t exist for a balanced state budget that doesn’t exist, according to the International Premium Cigar & Pipe Retailers Association.

Two legislators – Democrat Assemblyman Tom Torlakson of Contra Costa County and Democrat State Senator Alex Padilla of Los Angeles – have introduced AB89 and SB600, respectively. The bills propose to increase tobacco taxes to as much as $2.10 per pack of cigarettes on top of the current $.87 per pack state tax and recently increased federal taxes of $1.00 per pack plus correspondingly stiff increases on other tobacco products like cigars and pipe tobacco.

"It’s easy to call these ‘tobacco taxes’, but the truth is they are discriminatory taxes that target some 15 percent of California adults who enjoy tobacco in one form or another , whether they smoke cigarettes or savor hand-made cigars" said Chris McCalla, legislative director of IPCPR.

"Real people pay these taxes… real people at all economic levels who vote and who have had enough overspending by government. They are customers of our more than 200 members throughout the state of California who are smoke shop owners and manufacturers or distributors of premium cigars and other tobacco products. They are, for the most part, small, family-owned businesses that employ thousands of their neighbors. As taxes go up and sales go down, their businesses are as threatened as the jobs of their employees and the sales, income and other taxes collected by the local, state and federal governments," McCalla said.

Proponents of increased tobacco taxes claim they will make it more difficult for under-aged individuals to purchase cigarettes.

"Higher taxes do not make it more difficult for teen-agers to purchase tobacco … they only make it more expensive for them and everyone else. If we want to keep kids from smoking – and we agree that everyone should support that goal – we should be enforcing the laws that are already on the books as do all members of the IPCPR," said McCalla.

McCalla disagreed with an editorial in a California newspaper (Wednesday, June 17, Los Angeles Times) that said increasing state tobacco taxes would be a "fair and constructive" way to find "balance" for the budget.

"The bills’ sponsors are estimating that these new, taxes on 15 percent of Californians might generate up to $2 billion as the state seeks to fill its $24 billion deficit. That is anything but fair, constructive or balanced," McCalla said.

4 Responses

  • California would TAX each footstep or breath of air a person took if they could figure out how to do it… I better not give them any ideas…

  • Phil,
    Yikes, please don’t give them (especially Padilla) any ideas. How do we get the people of California (and elsewhere) motivated enough to vote these people out of office?

  • California feels the need to tax luxury items, so the citizens will forget what an fd-up job the state government has done with the real state problems. Like, water, power, and illegals: which which are overloading all services. God forbid taxing factories, farms, and any other businesses that are hiring people who are in this country illegally. You never see a skinny illegal. Most are obese, with 5 obese kids, which also overloads health care. California should tax fast foods. That would pay for many things. I am not blaming the people. I feel pity.

  • When are we going to realize that the politicians like Padilla, Jenny Oropeza, and
    Tom Torlakson are guilty of a conflict of interest which prevents them from representing All of the People, including citizens who smoke?
    These unjust attacks defy the State Constitution and the Rights to Property and the Pursuit of Happiness. As such, if you oppose tobacco, you may exercise your opinion, you may educate other according to the facts, but you May Not attack through biased laws the Rights of Citizens to use tobacco by Our State Constitution or by the 9th Amendment.
    As for curbing teen smoking, any attempt by the government to price a product out of reach of consenting adult citizens seems to me to be an anti-trust violation same as price-fixing to defeat competition.
    In the State of California, the sovereignty of the government belongs to The People.