Looking In Mirrors
-
Kevin Godbee - Jun 16, 2014
- 6 min read
G. L. Pease
Some years ago, a certain tobacco, one that was evidently quite popular, highly regarded, and fairly readily available, routinely found its way into my pipes. I bought and smoked tin after tin, and stashed away more than a few in the "cellar" for aging. This is no shattering news, until the dropping of the other shoe. Wait for it …
Here it is. One day, I woke up to face a sudden bold self-admission that I didn’t actually like the stuff, and really never had. I’d wanted to, because so many others did. Maybe I had suffered from some sort of eternal optimism, just knowing that one day, it would all come together, and I’d have the smoke of my life, but this never happened.
It was a very good tobacco, carefully made from top-quality leaf, beautifully presented, and well-deserving of its excellent reputation, but it just was not for me, and never would be. I had certainly given it a fair shot, smoking it in pipes of different sizes and shapes, experimenting with different packing and smoking techniques. I’d smoked it right from a freshly opened tin, and I’d smoked it after giving it some air time. I’d smoked it moist and I’d smoked it dry. I’d tried everything I could think of to get this blend, but nothing really worked. It simply did not offer what I wanted, what I expected from it.
Finally, on that day of momentary enlightenment that came only after a couple of years of diligent effort, I managed to spontaneously suss out that we simply would never be friends, that it was time to part company, at least for the time being.
Apparently, I am sometimes a slow learner.
I also, apparently, forget stuff. Tonight, as I was preparing to write, my thoughts began aimlessly wandering, as they so often do when I’m in the middle of a good session of highly disciplined procrastination. I’d filled a large but comfortable bowl from a freshly opened, well aged tin of that very same tobacco, conveniently forgetting that I didn’t really care for it, and settled in for the work ahead. After the charring light, a page full of doodles, a quick phone call, the brewing of a pot of tea, relighting the bowl, playing tug-o-war with my dog, checking to see if the guitar was in tune, grabbing a little snack, another relight, thinking about ironing my socks — you get the picture — I’d really be ready to get to work.
Then, suddenly, those old memories returned, along with the realization that, even after quite a few years of additional age, both my own and the tobacco’s, we still just don’t get along. Sure, there’s a lot going on in the smoke. There’s complexity, there’s the smokiness of the Latakia, the tang of the orientals, and somewhere in the background, the backbone of virginias are doing what it can to hold it all upright; it’s still a fine tobacco, enduring time in its tin with grace, but it’s just not coming together for me.
I might as well get it out of the way now that I’m not going to reveal the identity of the blend, so don’t even ask. That’s really not the point, here. I’m sharing this tonight not to criticize or praise any specific tobacco, but in hope of finding a little camaraderie with others, of knowing that I’m not alone in this peculiar species of lunacy. I’m sure it happens to many of us. We read the reviews, bask in others’ enthusiasm, and jump at the opportunity to join such a delightful party. We internalize a parade of expectations, often unrealistic, and are then sometimes reluctant to admit, even to ourselves, that what seems to be bringing them so much joy just isn’t for us. Maybe a different pipe will fix it, next time, or a little breathing time, or waiting until the next dark moon to try it again.
Events along our journey with other tobaccos, other pipes, can sometimes turn up the dial on this phenomenon. Most of us, I’m sure, have had those moments when a tobacco that didn’t quite "work" for us initially ultimately became a favorite as we began to understand it. Further, just as there are those magically perfect pipe and tobacco pairings, there are the more sinister combinations where a tobacco brings out the worst in an otherwise wonderful briar, or vice versa. So, when we first try something new, all aglow with expectations and enthusiasm, our experiences reinforce the fact that, if things do happen to go sideways, it might just be one of those anomalous convergences of all the wrong things, and that we should press on with the exploration, cheerfully trusting that the next bowl, or maybe the one after that, will bathe us in the glorious light that so many others have witnessed. We must be doing something wrong, and with today’s instant reach to thousands of opinions, it’s easy to find reinforcement for this notion, forgetting that we’re each seeking our own benchmarks, and that while knowing more about the perceptions of others can serve to enhance our own experience, sometimes, that knowledge doesn’t define what we like or don’t like.
Different horses for different courses. It seems pretty obvious when reflected in the rear view mirror, but it can be easy enough to forget for those of us who’ve been around the briar patch for more than a few seasons, and even more so for the newer pipester who often turns to forums and reviews seeking guidance for how to get the most of this strange pastime of ours.
Despite some of our frequent romantic reminiscences of the "Good Old Days," we’re actually very fortunate, today, to have such a wide array of choices so readily available. Some we’ll like, others we won’t. Navigating these waters can be daunting and confusing, especially to the newcomers; it takes time to learn to trust our own sometimes changing tastes, but the one lesson I wish I’d learned earlier is that I don’t have to like something just because the big kids do. I often receive email from someone asking if he’s "doing something wrong," because he doesn’t get on well with a blend that’s popularly regarded. Neophytes, veteran smokers, and tobacco blenders alike sometimes just need a little reminder that we’ve all got different tastes, and that it’s okay not to like what others do.
With this in mind, I’ll probably give this tobacco a few more tries. I may end up finishing this tin, or giving it to a friend who likes the stuff, or it may end up jarred to sit for another few years until I forget, again, only to discover it and enthusiastically repeat the same experience. Did I mention I can sometimes be a slow learner?
Your turn.
-glp
 Since 1999, Gregory L. Pease has been the principal alchemist behind the blends of G.L. Pease Artisanal Tobaccos. He’s been a passionate pipeman since his university days, having cut his pipe teeth at the now extinct Drucquer & Sons Tobacconist in Berkeley, California. Greg is also author of The Briar & Leaf Chronicles, a photographer, recovering computer scientist, sometimes chef, and creator of The Epicure’s Asylum. See our interview with G. L. Pease here. |
Written by Kevin Godbee
21 Responses
Recent Posts
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 619. Our featured interview tonight is with Corey Hays. Corey is a 26-year old pipe smoker that is part of our ongoing series of pipe smokers that are under the age of 30. He is from Mississippi and has never lived more than 20-minutes away from The Country Squire Tobacconist. He was influenced to smoke a pipe by reading J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, and 20th Century American History. He has been smoking pipes for three years. At the top of the show, Brian will have a tobacco review of a special tobacco that you could only get a pipe show.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 618. Our featured interview tonight is with AJ Khaled. AJ is a 22-year old pipe smoker that is part of our ongoing series of pipe smokers that are under the age of 30. Interestingly, he wasn’t initially inspired to take up the pipe by The Lord of the Rings, but more so by the author Tolkien himself while he was reading some of his other works. AJ has some really unique custom made pipes where he gave design specifics to and had them made by pipe makers Chris Askwith and Arcangelo Ambrosi. At the top of the show, weâll have an âAsk the Pipemakerâ segment with pipe artisan Jeff Gracik.
The other day, I was having a conversation with a friend about tobacco moisture. He tends to believe that a freshly opened tin presents the blenderâs notion of the ideal moisture content for that tobacco, and thatâs how it should be smoked. Heâs not wrong, but as with so many things in our wacky world, itâs a little more complicated than that. When thinking about ideal moisture content for any specific tobacco, there are criteria for determining âcorrectâ levels that can sometimes be at odds with one another. The proper moisture content for packaging tobacco, for instance, may not be the ideal moisture for smoking it. By way of background, letâs have a very brief and simplified look at the life of our beloved leaves once theyâve left the curing barns. Whole leaves or strips, the lamina of the leaves with the midrib removed, are boxed or baled quite dry for storage and transport. Before the tobacco can be worked, it has to be conditioned to a moisture level that allows it to be handled without shattering. There are various ways to accomplish this, but the end result is leaf that is pliable and easily manipulated without breaking. It can then be pressed into soft cakes that are cut into ribbons, or blended in stacks destined to be turned into plugs or flakes. At this point, itâs too moist to be considered âfinished,â and has to go through a redrying stage. Since all of these steps may take place over a matter of months, or even years, tobacco can go through several conditioning/redrying cycles before it becomes the finished product. When itâs time to package a blend, the moisture level of the tobacco may have to be adjusted once again. If itâs too damp, thereâs an increased risk of mold blooms, either within the sealed tin, or when spores are introduced after the tin is opened. This is never a good thing, so thereâs a fairly hard upper limit to how much moisture is acceptable at this stage. If the leaf is too dry, on the other hand, things get troublesome in a different way. Dry, fragile tobacco can break into small fragments, even to the point of some of the leaf turning to dust during handling when packing the tins, and when those tins are jostled about during transport. This, again, is not ideal, establishing a lower limit for moisture content. Then, thereâs the tobacco’s potential for aging to be considered. In order for these biological and chemical changes to take place, there has to be enough moisture to support the metabolic processes of the microorganisms involved in the various stages of fermentation that begin once the tin is sealed, and to allow for equilibration of various volatile byproducts of those processes. Finally, within the relatively wide window of upper- and lower-boundary conditions, thereâs the moisture level for best smokability to be considered. Thatâs where things can get a little tricky. Different smokers have different preferences, and this is confounded by the fact that different types of tobaccos behave differently when their relative moisture content changes. To my palate, mixtures containing high percentages of latakia or oriental tobaccos generally tend to smoke and taste their best when on the dry side, while blends that predominantly comprise Virginia tobaccos like a bit more moisture to bring out their sweetness. But, this is a very general guideline, and I often find exceptions. Sometimes the same tobacco can be quite mercurial in its presentation depending on how damp or dry it is. The other day, I had a bowl of a latakia and Virginia-rich flake, fresh out of the tin with no drying time, and it was delightful, with the sweetness of the virginias taking center stage. A subsequent bowl, after a bit of drying time, rendered the orientals more forward, softened the sweetness, and polished the sharper edges of the latakiaâs flavor profile. Same tobacco; two very different experiences. Additionally, things like ambient air temperature and relative humidity can play a significant role in the way any tobacco burns, but more importantly, how it tastes. (When itâs hot and humid, I generally abandon my latakia mixtures in favor of VAs and VA/perique blends.) If you havenât experimented with this, itâs a fun thing to play with. Take enough tobacco out to fill your next bowl, and let it sit out for a while – anything from a few minutes to an hour or two, depending on the climate. (For those in tropical zones, this might actually have the opposite result. Yes, there really are people in some parts of the world who keep their tins sealed to keep moisture from getting in, not out.) See how it tastes in comparison to fresh from the tin. When tobacco is on the dry side, a gentle hand when packing is advised. What about when we rediscover an opened, long-forgotten tin whose contents have become all but desiccated? Can it be brought back to life? While the tobacco wonât return 100% to its best form, as some of the volatile components from aging will be lost to the ether, it can certainly be made smokeable again, and might yield some pleasant surprises. Of course, first give it a try as is, and see what itâs like. There are a couple of good ways to bring the moisture level up, and some not so good ways. I donât recommend spraying it with water, putting apple or potato slices in the tin, or any other drastic measures. Tobacco takes up moisture much more slowly than loses it, and it will take time for all the strands to reach equilibrium, so a gentle approach is advised. My favorite is to put the leaf in a small bowl, cover the bowl with a damp cloth or paper towel, and set a plate on top. Keep an eye on it over a day or two, checking the progress periodically and ensuring the cloth remains damp. This also works […]
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 617. Our featured guest tonight is Jon David Cole. JD is the Owner/Tobacconist at The Country Squire in Jackson, MS, and the accompanying online store. Weâll have JD and Brian talking about what’s new at the store and in the business in general, including Scandinavian Tobacco Group’s acquisition of Mac Baren. At the top of the show, Brian will discuss pipe shows, pipe show organizing, and the Las Vegas International Pipe Show.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 616. Our featured interview tonight is with Gabe Hall. Gabe is a 23-year old conservative Californian from Bakersfield that is involved in politics part time. He is part of our newer ongoing series of pipe smokers that are under the age of 30. Both his story of starting pipe smoking, and his smoking routine are a little bit different than the usual story. At the top of the show we will have an Ask the Tobacco Blender segment with Jeremy Reeves. Jeremy is the Head Blender at Cornell & Diehl, which is one of the most popular boutique pipe tobacco companies in the USA.
Ok, the old Pundit is gonna say this only once. Well, maybe twice: Itâs beach time! Some of my happiest pipe-smoking memories were created on the back deck of an original Pawleys Island, S.C., beach house. Listening to the waves dash and flop were pure music, highlighted by the squealing laughter of children frolicking along the beautiful Atlantic shoreline. Now, before you go bellowing about shark attacks, Pundit has his No. 1 Rule about sharks and warning flags, even if no flags are flying on an empty stretch of coastline. Having fished the surf many a day and evening, and even occasionally on a high pier resting on mighty shell-encrusted pilings and stretching out over the aqua-tinted waters, it became apparent that predators with large, sharp teeth prowled menacingly close to splashing bathers So, Pundit Beach Rule No. 1, ankle-deep wading and strolling, only. Make quick swims if it is not too windy, and never if menacing fins are seen cutting the water like the bow of a battleship. Rule adjustments might be needed for kiddies and exuberant beach paddlers in the family. Another necessary adjustment in the rule is no swimming alone. OK, beach lesson over. You donât have to take Punditâs word. Check out sea-going pipe-smoking experts: Herman Melville, who knew a thing or two about ferocious whales, and Sir Ernes Henry Shackleton, a famed adventurer who took on frozen seas. No sharks, but the message loudly proclaims oceans harbor many a menace, some large in body with huge teeth and some just frozen solid mountains of floating ice. And while checking up on Pundit, you might enjoy Chuck Stanionâs Herman Melville’s Literary Pipes February 4, 2022, in Pipe Line and his masterful story on the Shipwreck of Shacklefordâs Endurance, also in Pipe Line. Now back to Punditâs time on the beach, in a chair at sunrise on a screened-in deck, seas dancing, pipe in hand. Vacations today seem to be all hurly-burly, hurry, scurry, and worry. Back when a seaside deck beckoned, I packed not only fishing equipment, and some clothes, but also a shoulder bag full of pipes and enough tobacco to survive a voyage with Sir Shackleton. Each morning, noon, and night watch was accompanied by different pipes and different blends. Pipes ranged from Dunhills, Cavicchis, Ser Jacopos, Ashtons, Petersons, and Savinellis. Blends tended to be simple: aromatics and English containing various additives, of course. On rare occasions, I made a Pundit blend, which combined English with Latakia and aros with Virginia. Pundit blends were meh, but there were Cornell & Diehl, Capstan, Samuel Gawith, Three Nuns, Wessex, and the late lamented McClelland, plus a couple of others to save the rare moments. Pundit beach time was also a time for testing THESIS (taste, heat, enjoyment, strength, issues, satisfaction). There is but one way to do this properly and that is to employ a new cob pipe. Cobs give a good overall THESIS, sort of the cheaper version of precious sea-borne meerschaums. Cobs are, in a way, landlocked meers, and provide an excellent idea of how a particular blend will emerge. Ok, enough of experimentation. We are on a beach vacation, right? Observing the sun rising over an orange-lit horizon with a pipe and a cup of coffee is simply put, enchanting. Sun and ocean seem to merge for a brief moment in a blur of beauty. You can find yourself at the beach, leaning back in a chair, letting the morning-salted breeze sweep over you whilst you puff gently in between sips. Ahh, thatâs a morning on the beach. There is nothing quite like it in the Punditâs mind. And now for a couple of thoughts from real experts on sea adventures: Herman Melville is an American author, poet, and novelist best known for âMoby Dick.â But let us not forget Cornell & Diehlâs Melville at Sea tobacco series of blends: Billy Budd, Redburn, and John Marr, other noted works from Melvilleâs pen as well. It is better to fail in originality, than to succeed in imitation. He who has never failed somewhere, that man cannot be great. Failure is the true test of greatnessâHerman Melville. Then there is Sir Ernest Henry Shackleton. Pipes, as mentioned by Chuck in his excellent piece on the great explorer, who relied on his pipe when the going got rough. Through endurance we conquerâ Ernest H. Shackleton And finally, a Pipe Smoker of the Past cannot go without mentioning: Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, born May 22, May 1859, and died July 7, 1930. If you are struggling to identify Sir Doyle in your mind, then you might be too young to be reading this. Of course, he is the prodigious author of the great detective Sherlock Holmes novels. Holmes and his drama are must-reads on any pipe-smokerâs novel list. âNuff said! It is an old maxim of mine that when you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truthâSir Arthur Conan Doyle.
I dare say that if you’re a pipe smoker some time in your experience this has happened with either a blend or certain pipe or both. I used to wonder what everybody else was getting that I wasn’t. Eventually, I realized that I didn’t care.
You may notice that the opening photo has the guy smoking the pipe with the stem upside-down.
–
I chose that photo because I thought this guy represented what I refer to as the “cool kids in school”, who might not really be as cool as some think they are. That’s also why I chose the other photo of the guy in the robe.
Great comment papipeguy!
Funny that you just wrote about an argument I literally JUST had with this self claimed tobacconist. He kept saying how with some blends (mainly Latakia blends) that he would smoke one pipe, be disgusted , and throw the rest of the tin on the compost pile. I answered back by telling him how wrong he was for doing that and on so many levels as well. For one, my all time favorite blend I actually hated it at first. This blend being Quiet Nights. It just didn’t taste right or seem to smoke right on my first few pipes. Either way I wasn’t about to throw away $15.50 of my hard earned cash . So I let it chill in the tin for about two months before I read several reviews about it. A lot of these reviews said almost the same as what I thought. At the time I was somewhat of a neophyte in the whole pipe game so what I read was new to me. A few articles spoke of breathing the tobacco and giving it alittle dry time. I knew about different pipes effecting the overall smoke but I didn’t see how exposure to air could change the taste of it to any extent. Well at any rate I decided what could it hurt to give it another go, and what happened after that forever changed my whole view of pipe smoking. After about smoking a quarter of the bowl I was astonished how just a month of breathing completely altered the flavor of my now #1 fav. The flavors were so much more rich and melded. It smoked easier with less lighting. Damn my mouth was watering,,,, this was until that point , the best pipe I ever smoked. I remember thinking to myself how many other blends did I just skip over because the first few bowls didn’t agree with my palate. Also the aging process is another factorhas also
Before I joined the forum I smoked what I like….even though it was a small sampling in respect to the immense tobacco world. Then after becoming active and reading others like and dislikes, I started buying tobacco at a near record clip……..I have 75 lbs cellared and 16 different blends in current rotation.
Yesterday I jarred everything and opened a fresh tin and realized I am a wandering generality and decided to become a meaningful specific. I’ve since smoked 7 bowls of the same tobacco and SHAZAAM…….I’m finally able to figure out subtleties and nuances I never knew existed.
My new mission it to smoke a blend one tin or two ounces if bulk, then move on to the next so I can better understand me, my tastes and likes.
Wonderful comments already rolling in…thanks!
.
There was a guy who used to come in to the tobacconists where I was working, fill his bowl with whatever new thing there was on offer, smoke a few puffs, dump it out and proclaim, “It’s not for me.” I once suggested that, perhaps, he might want to give a blend a fair shot. “Look here, sonny, I’ve been smoking a pipe longer than you been livin’, and I can tell at an instant whether or not it’s any good.”
.
What amazing talent, no? One day, I put his regular blend in a jar with a new name, and offered it to him. I don’t need to tell you what happened.
.
I guess he was SO good, he could taste the difference in the glass jars…
As a new pipe smoker, it’s good to hear that there are well-regarded blends out there that some people just don’t like. I count myself fortunate that I came across this forum before I got too invested in thinking that I ought to like Tobacco X – so many people have told me “Smoke what you like” that I’ve taken that to heart. I do try to give a blend a fair shake (a sample ounce or two, or a tin that I’ve bought on a whim), but I don’t see the point in stocking up on something that I don’t care for.
Thanks for the validation. đ
I think we all have had that same experience, as well as the reverse. I never smoked the OTC blends, because after a bad I counter with a certain cherry blend, I decided that all drugstore tobacco was inferior. Recently, I tried Walnut, and Sugar Barrel. Now I decry the fact that they are being discontinued, because they were both very good. We may never see their like again.
I, too, am reticent about tossing a blend that I absolutely don’t like. And I, too have been suckered into buying blends that were the next big thing, or the great old stuff, because of popular opinion. These days though, if I absolutely don’t like a blend after resting it a year, I will cheerfully donate it to others, rather than toss it on the woodpile. Unless I can mix it with something else. đ
Couldn’t agree more. Some things you just don’t like, and never will.
Been there, done that.
Greg,
Although a pipe smoker of decades I am an even slower learner. A few months back I bought a flake, Germain’s dark flake said to be very similar to Stonehaven, out of curiosity. Fine so far. I then tried it and did not finish the bowl. Repeated a week later. And then again and again about once a week. Bought another few ounces to keep this going but still have’nt actually finished a bowl. Usually I give up on a blend that does not suit fairly quickly although I have learned to give tobaccos a second chance after weeks of airing. Obviously can not quite accept that this tobacco, which is so well regarded, is just not for me. Having had the pattern so masterfully analysed will I now stop? Perhaps, but I just as likely I may go round the merry go round a few times yet before rationality reasserts itself.
Regards
Ed
One might take knowing that you don’t like a blend as a blessing, especially if it’s a particularly popular blend in high demand with little rarely available. Not liking it could be a relief, in the knowledge that you don’t need to keep a vigilant eye out for the rare tin of it.
There are always more blends to try on the list!
Thought provoking article
Great Article
Thank you
It’s good to hear that the Greg Pease that I thought I knew, bullet-proof and master blender/pipe critic, suffers, at least at times, from the same malady that we all do: human error.
Great article and certainly I have fallen to the mass hysteria of the ‘one blend that you must have’ routine.
What I find confusing is how certain blends can be a favorite on one day and really be distasteful or not enjoyable on another?
Ah, the fickleness of the palate.
I think we’re all prey to the unobtania blends that are more hype than substance.
There is a great difference between blends that really do take a bit of work to learn to appreciate and those that are just well touted – the problem is to find the difference!
Before i got to the stage where i now smoke two tobaccos exclusively (bar the odd treat pouch of a different tobacco).
Tried marlin flake it had everything in it that i loved (virginia perique cavendish, it has very favourable reviews, top qaulity tobacco and well made.
But i found i just didnt care for it, im not saying its a bad tobacco its just not for me.
Like gregg said in his article i tried numerous different techniques and it just didnt work.
The best way i can describe it is that although it was smoking it just didnt let me into the nuances and that little bit of smoking experience that makes something click inside that makes you want more.
I guess it is just one of them things for some people its instant jackpot for others it isnt i know there is people out there that adore this tobacco and thats good and i respect that.
To me it was a very big learbing curve (and costly due to british tobacco prices) just because something has brilliant reviews it doesnt mean it is going to be just as brilliant for me.
Well pout Greg. I still recall to others the conversation we had at the Richmond show, several ” season ” back,
where you suggested that my body Ph and yours were far apart on the scale. Thus, it was easy to understand why
our choices were divergent.
Kudos for an entertaining and thoughtful exposition on this subject!
Best Regards,
Steve
Ah, that should be: ” Well put, Greg. ” !! 8^)
It must be quit common to fall in love with a new blend only to become disenchanted with it after the second tin. Maybe this can be explained by how and why our sense of taste becomes inured: when the novel becomes the familiar.
Hmmm Greg. Moi? I’m far too rational for that – heh. Though I must confess that I am extremely susceptible to suggestion, I usually find that blends tend to grow on me. However, the converse also happens, where past favorites lose their standing, presumably as my fickle palate mutates. There have been highly regarded blends that I find myself trying to like more than I am actually enjoying. But the sheer variation in my personal response to a given blend/pipe pairing plus the real variations that the pairing itself induces makes my spreadsheet cataloging (sp?) each bowl full of statistical noise. Even when I am mindful of your advice as to the effects of time of day, specific foods and drink, the blend history in a given pipe, and weather, I see a lot of almost random experiencing which tends to lend a spirit of adventure to each new bowlful. Soooo… I dunno..
hp
les