John Cotton Throwdown Results & Reviews (PM.com Exclusive)
-
Kevin Godbee - May 5, 2012
- 6 min read
E. Roberts & Kevin Godbee
The 2012 John Cotton Throwdown event just completed moments ago at Pheasant Run Resort at The Chicagoland Int’l Pipe & Tobacciana Show. The winner that came the closest to the original John Cotton’s blend, decided by the expert judges is Dick Silverman, Chief Catoonah and the winner of the "People’s Choice Awards", which is the blend with the most votes comparing the three contestant blends, is Leonard Wortzel, Lane Limited. The judging scores had the contestants placing as follows; 1st Place – Dick Silverman, 2nd Place – Steve Books, and 3rd Place – Leonard Wortzel.
The judges were Neill Archer Roan, Marty Pulvers, and Russ Ouellette. (Russ was absent due to illness, but Scott Bendett, the owner of PipesandCigars.com did a great job filling in for Russ.) The contest was presented by the Seattle Pipe Club and New York Pipe Club, and hosted by Chicagoland Pipe Collectors Club.
The 2012 John Cotton Throwdown was sponsored by Sutliff Tobacco Company.
As an extra bonus to this exclusive breaking news, Pipes Magazine also has the scoop with reviews of the three contestant blends. These are blind reviews, where Mr. Roberts only knew the tobaccos by their code letter. He did not know which blends came from which contestants. Let’s see how his reviews compare to the contest results. – Kevin Godbee
John Cotton Throwdown Contestant Blend Reviews – by E. Roberts
If you’ve ever met the Guss brothers, you know that they are like a force of nature. Not in a Lance Armstrong, Hurricane Katrina sort of way, though … no, being pipe men, they’re much more subtle; more like glaciers, or erosion. Thus it was that they wore down my resistance and convinced me to review the three entrants to this year’s John Cotton Throwdown. Despite my protests of not being a qualified English smoker, of never having tried the original John Cotton’s mixture, and of not knowing the style of the contestants, they insisted, and I acquiesced. Due to the limited amounts of the entry blends, I was only able to taste test approximately 5-6 grams of each sample over the course of a couple days. Normally I prefer to smoke through an ounce or twelve of a blend in a variety of pipes until I feel I really have a handle on it, as there are so many variables that affect the smoking experience. I am happy to report, though, that these samples were the next best thing to going to the Chicago show, and were wonderful smokes each in their own right.
My sample packets were labeled simply X, Y, and Z, and are the same packets that will be available to all attendants at the show for the people’s choice vote. Being that I have such clout in the pipe world’s inner circle, as it were, I was able to procure two packets of each blend. Membership certainly does have its privileges. To ensure I got a fair crack at each of them, my initial tastes were in briars for the all-important first impressions, followed by clay pipes to really look for the specific notes, and finally half-bowls in a meer to see how the flavor profiles tied together.
Again, I would not consider the following a full review of the blends; rather they are a narrative of my tasting notes over the course of a couple of days—the same experience the crowd at Chicago will have. As I’m writing this on the Sunday evening prior to the show, I will cast my vote as well, although I’ve been told that the article won’t be published until the votes have been tallied and the winners declared.
Blend X [Steve Books, House of Calabash]:
The darkest overall color of the three blends, and perhaps the most Latakia-forward. The pouch aroma is pungent but not overly so, and actually rather mild in comparison to the body of the smoke, with the familiar leathery tang of Latakia and a hint of old book being the main scents. Packs easily and lights with a single match. An impressive smoke from the char to the heel, really, with a sweet top note of a honey-like Virginia giving way to the Latakia mid-tones that dominate until the finish. Just a twinge of a peppery zing in the retrohale, and a certain musty note, hints at Perique in small measure. By mid-bowl the flavors really open up, with very rich mid-tones of an exceptional loamy, peaty character balanced with the sweet high notes of melon or sweet pumpkin and the low end notes of a flat chocolate stout. The room note is of that gloriously stinky Lat, unrepentant in its musky spice. A hearty blend that is rich and full in every aspect including the nicotine quotient, with an exceptional Latakia component.
Blend Y [Dick Silverman, Chief Catoonah]:
A more evenly mottled brown range, with smaller cuts than the others—although this may be due to the amount of handling it has received. The pouch aroma is of a sweet and savory barbeque-like range, which translates into the smoking as well. It’s a bit sharp on the light, and immediately very tasty with tangy, buttered popcorn notes. Overall this blend seems a bit more Virginia-forward of the three, and my guess is that there is some fine stoved in there lending caramel & maple syrup flavors, and even a hint of anise on one’s palate in the aftertaste. The room note is splendid, with the barbeque and buttery feeling translating through as well with its sweet and smoky character, and none of the sourness of more bitter Latakias. This does best in the clay, notably, and begs for repeated bowls, which I sadly do not have. The finish is lighter on the nicotine and body, yet fully flavorful.
Blend Z [Leonard Wortzel, Lane Limited]:
The lightest-colored mixture of the three, ranging largely in the caramel and milk chocolate spectrum mottled with black, and with more ribbon cuts. The pouch aroma is decidedly bready and loamy with the clay-like notes of the Latakia. This blend is the more Oriental-forward of the three, in fact, and its aroma translates into the room note with a delightful graham cracker scent. From the light through the heel, it evidences a pleasing sharpness, though not biting; the profile stays on the higher notes with a cola-like sweetness from the Virginia, and the burnt-sugar & cardamom spiciness of the Orientals dominating. It finishes with a subtle dénouement into a more rounded, toasty feel with some woody notes.
As you can see, it was well worth the sacrifice to clear out my Sunday, kick back with plenty of tea and water crackers and an old film (The Stunt Man), and make tasting notes as I whittled my way through these three wonderful blends. All were notable for their balance, and especially their distinctiveness within a common thread of flavor. Having never tried the original John Cotton’s mixture, I really haven’t the faintest idea of which one may be closest to emulating it. I do think that each of them displays a character that could make them a new classic, and despite being a confessed dabbler in the Latakia end of the spectrum, I look forward to these being available—I will add each to my cellar for sure, because each left me wanting one more bowl at the end. It’s terribly difficult to pick a favorite of the three, because with their differing forward notes they appeal to different moods. Overall, though, I found Blend X to be the most intriguing and complex, and the one that I tended to rate the others against. Its Latakia component was outstanding, perhaps especially so because I’m not a regular Lat smoker and this one really grabbed me. Ultimately, it had that certain unquantifiable something that equaled more than the sum of its parts. I would like to thank and congratulate the blenders in advance for their outstanding efforts in creating such exceptional blends, and wish them all the best of luck with the contest. I’m really looking forward to hearing what the results are, and consider them all to be winning blends in my book.
Written by Kevin Godbee
12 Responses
Recent Posts
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 638. Our featured interview on tonight’s show is with Fae “The Sassy Pipe Lady” Simmons. Fae is the owner of Tobacco Treasures, which sells new, vintage, & estate pipes, and smoking accessories on Etsy. She has been in business since 2017, and has been surrounded by pipes and tobacco most of her life. Her father and his brother smoked pipes, and so does Fae. Her husband is also a retired tobacconist that worked all over the industry from coast to coast for several different companies in the industry. She has a great story of how her business got started with a great inventory of unsmoked vintage pipes. At the top of the show we will have an Ask the Tobacco Blender segment with Jeremy Reeves. Jeremy is the Head Blender at Cornell & Diehl, which is one of the most popular boutique pipe tobacco companies in the USA.
Ok, so it’s that time of year, as we all know. Family feasts, houses, yards, and big trees festooned with lights and dangling ornaments, just high enough to keep the cats from reaching a paw into the greenery. It’s also the time of year when your pipe-smoking-significant other makes vast hints about a new pipe. That’s to be expected since he or she was a good boy or girl during the year. Yes, ladies smoke pipes, too. Oh, you want an example? Okay, try Actress Greta Garbo, Millicent Fenwick, Mary Frith, and my late grandmother (who died when she was 93) dipped snuff and smoked a cob occasionally. So now that we have settled that the gentler side of life will puff a pipe too, let’s move on to the upcoming biggest holiday of all. Of course, that huge event is brought to us by the hefty fellow in a red suit, puffing his pipe all the way in a sled filled with presents, being led by a reindeer with a red nose. Or some such. That’s Santa Claus, of course. Becoming a bit more serious, Christmas is such a wonderful time for families and friends. It’s also quite special for pipe puffers. For many of us, this brings up a nostalgic look back to our pipe-smoking or cigar-smoking friends who have died during the current year. A great journalist pal whom I often joined in a local brick-and-mortar pipe and cigar shop. I puffed my pipe, and occasional cigar, as he enjoyed a cigar. He died in October and will be missed. On the happier side of things, Christmas is also a time when mind workers of the world renew their collections with fresh additions. Pundit included. A French passion has overtaken Pundit, from reading more Albert Camus, a heavy cigarette smoker, as were many French intellectuals of a certain time. Instead of cigarettes many of us prefer the more relaxed enjoyment of pipes for that “calm and objective judgment” in the comings and goings of the world. This brings me to French pipes. While visiting France once in the long ago, I happened by a “Tabac” shop in Paris, Tabac Des Vosges. I purchased a beauty of a Chacom bent. I also later bought a Ropp made from ancient briar. To learn more about the dawn of briar pipes and beginnings, take a peek at a well-done piece by Davin Hylton in Pipe Line on April 12, 2023, on Saint-Claude, France, the birthplace of briar. Also in the long back when, on a cold Christmas afternoon, Pundit wandered into an Atlanta bricks and mortar pipe shop to look around. There, resting in an enclosed glass counter was an exquisite Comoy. An older gent, smoking a beautiful bent, asked me if I wanted to look at that pipe. It had a $100 price tag. A college student working for a grocery store chain to help with college tuition at the time, Pundit didn’t have one hundred cents, let alone a C note! I declined and found a $5 basket pipe. A Christmas tradition had just begun. Since that early time, Pundit has made it a holiday ritual to either reward himself, or a special friend, with pipe or tobacco. A Claudio Cavicchi would be nice. Just sayin.’ And now for a couple of December-born Pipe Smokers of the Past: Joseph Rudyard Kipling was born on Dec. 30, 1865, and died on Jan. 18, 1936. I always prefer to believe the best of everybody; it saves so much trouble—Rudyard Kipling. Martin Van Buren, born Dec. 5, 1782, and died July 24, 1862, U.S. President, 1837-1841 As to the presidency, the two happiest days of my life were those of my entrance upon the office and my surrender of it—Martin Van Buren. And one more note to recall a deceased World War II veteran who loved William Somerset Maugham, the author. Maugham, a pipe smoker, was born in Paris, France, on Jan. 25, 1874, and died on Dec. 16, 1965. One cool afternoon as the veteran and I talked while sitting in his backyard patio, he looked off into the distance as if studying something. Nothing in particular. Just looking. He turned to me and said if I wanted to learn about life, “read Somerset Maugham.” I did. It wasn’t until late in life that I discovered how easy it is to say, ‘I don’t know’ –W. Somerset Maugham And now a Parting Shot: Any day with an old friend with pipes and tobacco is a good day.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 637. Our featured interview on tonight’s show is with Nate King. Most people know of Nate as an excellent pipe artisan. He also has an honorary Master of Pipes degree from the Chicagoland Pipe Collectors Club, and is a member of the prestigious Confrérie des Maitres Pipiers de Saint-Claude. To be inducted into the Confrérie, this past May Nate travelled to Saint-Claude, France with master tobacco blender G.L. Pease, who was also inducted. It was quite a time in France, and at the ceremony. We’ll hear all about those adventures on the show. At the top of the show we’ll continue the virtual tour of Brian’s pipe collection with six of his Satou Dublin-shape pipes.
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 636. Our featured interview on tonight’s show is with Barry Kane. Barry started smoking a pipe in 1961 when he was 14-years old. Back then it seemed like everybody smoked, and you could buy pipes and tobacco just about anywhere. Barry is a true old-school pipe smoker, sticking to just one blend. See if you can guess which one before listening. At the top of the show Brian will give his take on Scandinavian Tobacco Group’s purchase of Mac Baren and Sutliff Tobacco and their announcement that they will be shut down.
There’s a pipe in my collection that I cannot bring myself to smoke, though I’ve had it for more years than I care to recall. It’s old, or shall I say, well experienced; that experience, that oldness came to it long before it was in my possession. The pipe is an old Comoy’s Grand Slam from the 1940s. The shape (#93), a slightly canted, stack billiard (sometimes referred to as a Belgian) is right up my alley, and it’s a beautiful example of it. It came to me with some wear and tear; nothing unusual for an old pipe, but more the signs of one that has been well loved, smoked a lot, treated as a favorite tool, cherished, in a sense, by frequent use. It’s the pipe equivalent of a vintage car that’s been driven a lot, enjoyed fully and maintained adequately, rather than one kept in a spotless garage, dusted and detailed weekly, brought out only for leisurely Sunday drives, or to be ogled behind the ropes at the next Concours d’Elegance. When it arrived, those uncounted years ago, it wanted a little restoration. Nothing dramatic needed to be done to it, but the stem was oxidized, the finish a little dingy. The cake was even and fairly thin, and the airway was relatively clean, both signs that its previous owner cared for it, but the bowl’s surface was a little drab and dull. It took little effort to reveal its beauty, to show the lovely contrasted stain and interesting grain beneath the old wax. I often think I should do before and after photos of pipes that I work on, but those thoughts always come after the work’s been done. This one would have been a great illustration of how years of handling that can sometimes make a pipe more beautiful, can other times make it just look grungy. Once I’d cleaned up the externals, it was time to address the inside bits. I approach this a little bassackwards, I realize. It would be more sensible to take care of the inside before addressing the outside, but it’s how I roll. If an old pipe isn’t pretty to look at, it’s unlikely that I’ll care much about it, and cleaning is usually the hardest part, or at least the most boring part of any restoration for me. Alcohol and pipe cleaners. Lots of pipe cleaners. That’s why I leave it for last. Sometimes, I’ll even give a pipe a test smoke before a deep cleaning, just for a point of reference. I gave it a sniff to get an idea of what I was up against, and it stopped me cold. There in that bowl was an aroma that I had not smelled in decades. My head was instantly filled with memories of being in the back room of a fabled Berkeley tobacconist’s shop where I stumbled upon a few jars of long discontinued blends. One of them, a blend called Forty and Eight, had the most engaging and unusual scent of any tobacco I’d stuck my schnoz into. It was sweet, but not in a candy store way. There were none of the usual vanilla, cherry, berry or anise notes of typical aromatics, nothing that could be compared to aftershave or deodorant soap, but something almost musky, a little earthy, something exotic. The shop’s owner couldn’t tell me what was in it, how, or where it had been produced. The old blend had been retired before he’d bought the place. The printed catalogue gave no clues, either, other than being overprinted with the word “DISCONTINUED” in bold, rubber-stamp type. (And, I don’t recall it as being “highly aromatic” as the description indicates.) There was still quite a bit in the jar. Being, at that point, an intrepid explorer of all kinds of tobaccos, whether I thought I’d like them or not, I had to give it a try. It was burly based, but also comprised a good measure of virginia leaf, and maybe some other varieties; I didn’t have enough experience at the time to really pick it apart. But, that aroma was unlike anything I’d experienced before or since. It was something now completely lost to time. Until it wasn’t. Memories are powerful things, and there is no sense more tightly bound to memory than our sense of smell. One whiff was all it took to carry me back in time, conjuring a vivid recollection of something long submerged in the inky depths of a subconscious mind. Look, I know as well as anyone that pipes are meant to be smoked, and that many feel it almost sacrilegious to have a pipe and not set it to its intended task. In this case, I simply can’t. I won’t. Ever. Rationally, I am fairly certain this pipe would probably be a great smoke. It was too well loved by its previous caretaker to be anything less than that. My choice not to smoke it is an emotional one, not something rational. Of the thousands of pipes that have passed through my hands over the years, this is the only one to create such a singular and vivid, almost Proustian recollection of temps perdu, of lost time. It revivified a long dormant memory that is mine, and mine alone, and that’s enough. I keep it in a drawer with other old English pipes. In some ways, it’s nothing special, just a nice old pipe. I don’t lavish it with any particular care that arguably befits the hidden treasure that it holds. It’s not in a special box, or displayed preciously in a glass cabinet. Every once in a while, I take it out, point my nose bowlwards, and every time, those memories return just as powerfully as they did the first time. I have no idea how long it’s been since its last owner smoked it, but in the years I’ve had it, there seems to have been very little degradation of the aroma, and that’s […]
Welcome to The Pipes Magazine Radio Show Episode 635. Our featured interview on tonight’s show is with James Ravenwood. James is the boutique tobacco blender of Ravenwood Blends. His blending started out as a fun hobby, and he now has professionally packaged commercially available products with some great tin art. Part of his interest in pipe smoking goes back to fond memories of a retired Navy Veteran that lived on his street while he was growing up that would sit in his driveway smoking a pipe all day. Later, in 2011 he began smoking pipes and soon after started experimenting with mixing different tobaccos. His other hobby, that he has been doing for 30 years, is photography. He takes wonderful photos of outdoor spaces, and still life pictures of pipes and tobacco. You can see them on his Instagram @thebriarfellowship. At the top of the show we’ll have an Ask the Pipemaker segment with renowned pipe artisan Jeff Gracik.
I liked all three blends a lot, and it was hard to decide which to vote for, but I chose Blend X from Steven Books, just like Mr. Roberts. I didn’t remember which one he picked when I was doing my tastings, so was not influenced by his choice.
Kevin, The westerly winds have pushed the scent of the John Cotton competitive blends all the way to Snohomish, WA overnight. Having missed the Show this year, it was a delight to find the news so swiftly on your page this morning. Thank you!! KevinK
We were amazed by the John Cotton Throwdown this year. Nobody thought the event could produce such outstanding blends again but it happened. The challenge of course, is to see whose blend comes closest to the original 28 year old John Cotton. The judges anguished and analyzed the entries over 3 weeks and went thru painstaking processes to reach their decisions. We were delighted to discover that Dick Silverman’s blend was the Grand Prize winner. Steve Books was a close second. Leonard Wortzel of Lane won the People’s Choice award. Thank you to all the contestants, all the pipesmokers who voted, our distinguished judges and the audience. And thanks to Pipesmagazine.com for their support and great coverage of this event. The Throwdown is OVER! Now go get these 3 wonderful blends and try them for yourself!
Congrats to all, especially People’s Choice award winner and Atlanta pipeman – Leonard!
HUZZAH!!!!!
Congratulations to Dick Silverman!!!
Too bad I couldn’t be there to see him win it in person.
All of the fellas with the Hudson Valley Pipe Club were rooting for him and we found out about his big win at our meeting on Sunday. Now the only question is, will he remember the recipe so that we can all try it!
Sean aka “DoverPipes”
LOL,Sean aka “DoverPipes” I have the written recipe stashed away in a couple of places so it’s safe. I’ve had preliminary chats with a couple of tobacco tinners and hope to have tins available by the end of the May. Once I’ve settled on the name for this re-creation mixture, I’ll update my website ChiefCatoonah.com. For the past couple of days, I’ve been busy hand blending this new mixture so we can all enjoy it!!!
Congratulations Dick, I was at my first HVPC meeting in over 4 years this Sunday and found out about your win. Can’t wait to try some. Maybe call it Wooly Dick’s instead of John Cotton?
Rob I
This was really a fun event. I did not get to taste any of the blends since I didn’t arrive on site until Saturday AM. The odd part of the whole affair is one of the judges asking the blenders “how do you go about creating a blend to match a tobacco that is tasteless?” He was not impressed with the 30-year old JC that he tasted.
While I understand that Russ was not available for the judging due to illness, it is not clear why a substitute was employed who did not know the qualities of what these three tobaccos were supposed to be matches of. While I fully respect this third judge’s opinion of the qualities of the tobaccos, this really was not a “throwdown.” So, what was wrong with just having two judges?
I think this kind of contest is great but may I ask that when information about the contestant tobaccos are presented that at the same time we can have their views of the tobacco they have judged them against–since they are using, by definition, an aged example? And if as in the previous item a judge was not impressed by the sample of this aged tobacco, then what is being judged?
As I read about the throwdown it appears as a contest of three tobaccos, against each other rather than against the Cotton.
As one of the competitors,I kinda smiled when Marty, one of the judges, made his remark with regard to the taste of the JC 1&2 sample. It confirmed that we all received samples in the same condition. I spent 2+ days carefully rehydrating my sample and then slow-smoked a bowl that had some fine flavor to it. So then I was ready to work on re-creating the blend. It seemed to work for me!! 🙂
Bob Silverman… to the best of my knowledge, Russ had virtually completed his role as a judge for the 2012 Throwdown.
He had smoked a number of bowls of the original as well as evaluating each of the three competing re-creations and submitted his final tally sheet almost a week before an unfortunate medical issue arose and prevented him from being with us for the presentation of the final results. In fact, I believe that Russ wrote a detailed article here discussing his approach to this year’s Throwdown.
His inability to be with us in Chicago was certainly a loss for me. I’m glad to know that he’s having a speedy recovery.
Well, obviously I would not have written what I had were this information regarding Russ’ involvement known to me, and I presume others.