Pipes Magazine » Pipe Repair and Maintenance

Search Forums  
   
Tags:   
[sticky]

Pipe mud and pipe cement (WARNING: GIANT POST)

(47 posts)
  1. dimm

    Dimm

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 107

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    So you probably know what pipe mud is. If you don't it's pipe ash mixed with water (or saliva) to form a paste. This paste is used in a pipe chamber to fill defects and change the chamber geometry (usually in the bottom). This can be used to fill a sandpit on the inside of a chamber, raise the bottom of a bowl to the level of the airway, or plug the sides of the shank in a corncob chamber. This paste dries in a day or so and over the course of many smokes the pipe mud will absorb tars, oils, and moisture and will harden to become an indistinguishable part of the surface of your chamber. Pipe mud is a great tool and is pretty much like duct tape when it comes to doing anything in your chamber. Now, most people use pipe ash for this but you could just as easily use cigar ash or cigarette ash. They all pretty much act the same. They stick together when wet and form a workable paste. What I've found to work the best is actually wood ash such as from your fireplace. This performs the same function as pipe mud but, as I've found, more effectively. Although it is similar to tobacco ash it is also quite different. I actually call it pipe cement and I'll tell you why.

    A major component of wood ash is calcium carbonate. This is what makes this ash a good fertilizer, especially for plants which need a lot of calcium. Calcium carbonate is also known as limestone and happens to be the major component of... *drumroll*... portland cement. In manufacturing the limestone is crushed into a powder and heat treated at high temperatures to become chemically active. Your fireplace burns hotter and more completely (in a chemical sense) than your pipe. This creates ash which not only contains more calcium carbonate but which is also much finer and which contains calcium carbonate which has been heat treated at a higher temperature. This makes your fireplace ash chemically different than your pipe ash. To put it shortly: your fireplace ash is a cement, your pipe ash is not. Take a look at this picture:

    Left is pipe ash, right is fireplace ash. Notice that the fireplace ash is much whiter and has a fine grain size. Notice that the pipe ash is black and clumpy.

    So you're thinking: so what? Who cares if fireplace ash is a cement, pipe ash has worked to make pipe mud for generations why should I switch now? Well, you're right there is no reason to switch and pipe ash works perfectly fine as pipe mud. I'm just an engineering student that works in a cement lab so I find this interesting. And also, as I'm about to tell you, pipe cement has some up sides where pipe mud falls short.

    First of all, pipe cement has much more agreeable working properties. That is to say it handles nicer as a paste. Since pipe cement is a fine powder you can slowly mix water into it with your pipe spoon until it becomes the consistency of play-dough. Pipe mud on the other hand tends to be a crumbly mess like dirt or... well... like mud. Take a look at the following photo:

    Notice how the cement has been made into an even mass while the pipe mud is an uneven and crumbly. At this point you can simply put the ball of cement on the end of your poker tool and lower it into your chamber, then you can press it and form it into the perfect contours in your chamber. Pipe mud does not handle half as nice as pipe cement

    Next there is the drying time. Pipe mud dries, meaning the moisture from it needs to evaporate before you can smoke your pipe. This takes 24 hours or so. After that the pipe mud is delicate until it has been smoked enough to absorb tars and oils and become hardened like cake. Since pipe cement is a cement it cures rather than drying. By this I mean that it reacts chemically with the water and the H2O molecules become part of the cement. This takes about 4 hours and you have a smokable pipe. After 24 hours you have a fully cured cement which makes a satisfying "clink clink" sound when you tap it with your tool.

    Your pipe cement will also cure to be much harder than the pipe mud. Take a look at the following photo: I pressed with the same amount of force with my spoon (3 hours after initial mixing) and you can see the difference in strength.

    So now you're thinking: so what? This is a pipe not a bridge why should I care how strong my pipe mud is? And you're right it's not that important but if you drop your pipe and your lump of pipe mud falls out that would not be great.

    There is also the matter of porosity. Pipe cement is amazingly porous! I estimate it can absorb at least its own weight in water. And dries fast. It is definitley superior to pipe mud in these terms. It's actually so great at picking up moisture and oils and tars that I've even thought about lining a briar pipe's chamber completely in pipe cement (kind of like meerschaum lined briar pipes).

    So there you have it... there's my little blurb about pipe mud and pipe cement. I don't claim I "invented" this or anything. I'm sure this has been thought of before but I have not found it in my search on this forum so I thought I should write this down here. If anyone does this I'd love to hear your personal experience with it. And if there is a reason people don't do this I'd love to hear it too! Although, from my personal experience I have not found any negative side effects of pipe cement.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  2. nsfisher

    nsfisher

    Member
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 1,750

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    awsome post mate, very good read and well written!

    Now i gotta larn how to reed and rite good
    Posted 4 months ago #
  3. ace57

    ace57

    Senior Member
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 2,150

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Nice post. Will have to try it.

    U.S.M.C. (SEMPER FI)
    Posted 4 months ago #
  4. dimm

    Dimm

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 107

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Thanks! I'll be selling Pipe Cement for 29.99/lb starting next week.

    Just kidding

    Posted 4 months ago #
  5. ejames

    ejames

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Oct 2009
    Posts: 1,161

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Great post! I will have to try this!
    If it works out I believe I can beat your price though!!

    Posted 4 months ago #
  6. rickpal14

    rickpal14

    Senior Member
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 1,084

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Great timing!! I was just about to research pipe mud as I need to fill in the beginning of a burnout on one of my Dr. Grabows (Starfire). Awesome!!!

    Posted 4 months ago #
  7. rickpal14

    rickpal14

    Senior Member
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 1,084

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    This thread should probably become a "Sticky"!!!

    Posted 4 months ago #
  8. dd951

    dd951

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jun 2010
    Posts: 528

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    what nsfisher said

    Born Again Heathern
    Posted 4 months ago #
  9. drsam

    drsam

    Member
    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 231

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I agree. Make it a sticky.

    Now if I just had a fireplace......

    Sir Walter Raleigh, name of worth, how sweet for thee to know.
    King James, who never smoked on earth, Is smoking down below.
    Posted 4 months ago #
  10. User has not uploaded an avatar

    Anonymous

    Unregistered

    Posts: 2,214

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Nice post. My pipe mud is made with Cigar ash. I have many buddies that smoke cigars and save their ash for me.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  11. spartan

    Spartan

    Senior Member
    Joined: Aug 2011
    Posts: 1,534

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I did think any actually used ash from pipe tobacco for pipe mud.

    Everywhere I have read uses cigar ash.

    I would be interested in how cigar ash hold up to the firewood ash.

    I actually need to use a good amount of pipe mud in one of my pipes to raise the bottom to the airway and I intend to try it out with cigar ash first.

    "I was born to lose. So I'll die to win." -Breaking Benjamin
    Posted 4 months ago #
  12. yohanan

    yohanan

    Senior Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 560

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Thank You for your very informative post. I will most certainly save me some ash from the fireplace and give it a go.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  13. dimm

    Dimm

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 107

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    It's true most people use cigar ash. And it is better than pipe ash because its finer which makes for better workability but it is still closer to pipe ash than it is to wood ash.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  14. olderthandirt

    OTD

    Senior Member
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 2,175

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    That was indeed a nice writeup Dimm.

    Must say I have never had the issues you describe using the ash from a pipe.
    "Pipe mud on the other hand tends to be a crumbly mess like dirt or..."
    What you have pictured as being from a pipe looks as though it's heavily laden with dottle. If that's the case I can see where you may have issues using it.

    I have posted a few times on this forum and others in that I don't smoke cigars I use pipe ash.
    I always sift it before use and end up with the exact results you describe having had working with wood ash from your fireplace.

    It is good to know that wood ash will work if that's all that's available.

    Snus, snuff and briar.
    Not much more required in a day.
    Brian from Oregon USA
    Posted 4 months ago #
  15. ssjones

    Al

    Preferred Member
    Joined: May 2011
    Posts: 1,383

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Very interesting, thanks for sharing your engineering expertise. I'll have to save some of our firepit ash for future use. One gentleman over on the Smokers forum has used pipe mud to rebuild a calabash bowl that had a meerschaum liner, with good results.

    Al
    My Pipes:
    Posted 4 months ago #
  16. dimm

    Dimm

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 107

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    To tell you the truth the left image is actually a mix of cigarette and pipe ash from some black cavendish which left a lot of dottle (cause I couldn't smoke it all the way because I thought it was awful stuff) it was used simply for picture purposes. I usually use something that does look more like cigar ash, either from cigarettes or from pipe ash that was well burnt, and I sift out the dottle. I'm not a big cigar smoker so I don't often get a hold of cigar ash but I have done this with cigar ash. And, as I said, it is usually finer which gives it better workability (as in you'll be able to make it more play-dough and work it better) but it does not have the same drying/curing results. From what I've seen, no tobacco ash forms what I would call a cement. As in I have seen no sign of a chemical reaction. So you wet it, work it, and dry it. It does not cure fast and it does not cure to be as hard as the wood ash. The wood ash cures to be literally a rock.

    Anyways, having said all that this is not as scientific as it sounds. I do have some expertise in the field but I do not claim to know it all. I actually work mostly with chemical cements which do not resemble portland cement at all and which have no calcium content. There are general rules for cements but even then... these things have a tendency to become really complicated the longer you look at them. At the same time every tobacco is different. If there's something I've learned from working in a cement lab is that details do matter. A change from ph7 to ph8 in your solution might mean the differnce between a cement that cures to a rock and one that doest react at all. Your experience with pipe mud will depend what you smoke as the different tobaccos and additives as well as how you smoke can have a butterfly effect on what you end up with. I can see how some cigars and tobaccos might actually give you something that closely resembles the wood ash and some other ones (especially heavily aromatic ones) might give you pure crap. In fact what kind of wood ash you have might even make a difference! Mine seems great but yours might be crap. So yeah... things get complicated fast haha.

    I think I'll get a hold of a cigar and try the 3 (cigar, wood, and pipe) ashes side by side. I think I opened pandora's pipe mud box.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  17. olderthandirt

    OTD

    Senior Member
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 2,175

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    In fact what kind of wood ash you have might even make a difference. Mine seems great but yours might be crap. So yeah... things get complicated fast haha.
    I think I opened pandora's pipe mud box.
    Now you REALLY have opened it up, lol
    Pine vs oak vs maple vs .... hehehe

    Posted 4 months ago #
  18. dimm

    Dimm

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 107

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Good evening everyone,

    So I went out and bought a little captain black cheap cigar and made a pipe mud ball out of its ash (left). I also did the same with wood ash pipe cement (right).

    So as you can see there is a bit of a difference in scale haha. That's cause you can't get a lot of ash out of those little cigars. But that doesn't actually affect the experiment.

    So ... if both of these pipe mud balls were simply wet particles that dried by evaporating water (rather than curing by chemical reaction) you would expect the small cigar ash ball to dry and harden significantly faster than the big pipe cement ball. In fact, the exact opposite happened. The big ball hardened much faster. As well, it became much harder than the cigar ash ball which simply crushed back to powder with little pressure. This is what gives me the impression that the wood ash cures and pipe ash simply dries.

    But the cigar ash was finer than pipe ash so its workability in the paste was quite similar to wood ash.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  19. unclearthur

    unclearthur

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Mar 2010
    Posts: 7,639

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I may give the wood ash a try after I run off the lye from what I have been saving back for a soap making experiment. I am thinking I would rather use the ash after the lye has been extracted.

    If at first you don't succeed you are running about average.
    Posted 4 months ago #
  20. User has not uploaded an avatar

    Anonymous

    Unregistered

    Posts: 524

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    iam curious now, i have a question regarding pipe mud/cement. i have used pipe ash with honey, then read where you can use the carbon cake from reaming mixed with small amount of honey to rise the bottom of the bowl even to the air hole. i really like the idea of using water in stead of honey. do you guys have any thoughts on this method. many many years ago an old pipe man told me you could use a mix of honey and pipe ash and apply it too the inside of a naked chamber stating at the mid point going to the bottom of the bowl, using a very thin layer of honey/ash mix, i did it and it really works... i prefer to break in my naked bowls without using any type of aiding material. just wondering what you guys think.

    thanks.

    mike lyvers.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  21. ssjones

    Al

    Preferred Member
    Joined: May 2011
    Posts: 1,383

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I've read recently from folks who write articles in "The Pipe Collector" (NASPC) who use honey or other to coat new pipe bowls. I've never tried that myself. In fact, now that I think about it, they have an article on the subject. I have it in my Kindle, but haven't read it yet. Read it free here with about another dozen pipe articles:
    http://www.naspc.org/Archives/breakin.htm

    I'll put in a plug for the NASPC, $10 a year for their email newsletter membership. Six 40-plug page newsletters a year is worth many more times that small cost. I paid $5 extra for the 2010 newsletters and just finished those, all worthy of that cost individually.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  22. User has not uploaded an avatar

    Anonymous

    Unregistered

    Posts: 524

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    thanks AL, i appreciate it sir. the last line read, he would never use honey for breaking a pipe. my experience with the honey, it did work in aiding the building up of a cake in the chamber (tobacco). i myself prefer to build cake naturally, and smoking to the bottom of the bowl.

    thanks again AL.
    take care.

    mike.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  23. olderthandirt

    OTD

    Senior Member
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 2,175

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    @ mlyvers
    I've only used water and sifted pipe ash, never tried the honey or jam.
    Using water, I've raised the bottom of the chamber on 5 or 6 pipes and fortified the bottom on a few cobs. The mud used in these applications is still in place, hard as you could wish for.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  24. User has not uploaded an avatar

    Anonymous

    Unregistered

    Posts: 524

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    thanks OTD. i will give this method ash/water a try the next time i need to rise the bottom of a bowl. the bowls of cobs always seem to be below the air hole.

    take care.

    mike.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  25. dimm

    Dimm

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 107

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    So since I posted this I've been wondering how I could confirm any of my speculations about wood ash making a cement and tobacco ash not. Because theories are great but some sort of hard evidence would be nice. Luckily a simple test popped into my head today.

    So geologists have been using a simple field test for identifying limestone for more than 100 years. This test is called them acid test. What you have to do is drop a drop of acid onto the rock and if it bubbles it is limestone and if it doesn't its not. This because acid reacts with (and dissolves) calcite which is what limestone is made of. This also happens to be how acid rain wears away limestone statues and buildings over the years. Calcite is also know as calcium carbonate which is what cement is (remeber limestone is one of the major ingredients of cement). So this same test should he able to disinguish cement from non cement.

    Basically, I'm going to make 3 balls, one from pipe ash, one from cigar ash, and one from wood ash. Then, I'll drop some acid on each and see if they bubble. If it bubbles it confirms that the ball is made from a calcium carbonate cement.

    I'll give this a shot with household acids (lemon juice or vinegar) and if that doesn't work I'll take it to my lab and try some stronger acids.

    Posted 3 months ago #
  26. dimm

    Dimm

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 107

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Now... if you're confused about the chemistry here don't worry... so am I (and how). Chemistry is not simple and as I said previously, Portland cement is not my specialty. However, I think I have finally put all the pieces together. And I can finally answer the silica question. But let me reexplain some things from the beginning...

    So... calcite is calcium carbonate and it is what both limestone and cement are made of. The reactions that make cement and limestone are different, however, the final product is the same: calcite (calcium carbonate). In that sense it is acurate to think of limestone as natural Portland cement. Or to think of Portland cement as artificial limestone.

    Now... having said that you cannot simply take calcium carbonate, mix it with water, and get a cement. That doesn't make any sense because calcium carbonate is a product not a reactant. It would be like grinding up hardened cement, mixing it with water and expecting another solid cement. You won't get that you'll just get a wet muck that dries back to a powder. However, ground limestone IS a raw material for cement, however the ground calcite is then heat treated and mixed with other materials to become a mix of calcium oxide, silica, and magnesium oxide. These three together will react with water to form calcium carbonate, the cement!

    Now we can procede to wood ash. I found answers to many of my questions about wood ash in the following paper: http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/pdf1993/misra93a.pdf its a little hard to read but contains all the information we need. So basically, when wood is burned it produces lots of minerals including forms of Mg, Ca, Na, Si, C etc. However, theprecise products depend on the type of wood and the temperature its burned at! This where things get interesting. Burned at a low temperature the product is largely calcium carbonate, calcite. As we just said, this IS cement so mixing this with water does not make a cement. It will simply dry up to the original powder of calcium carbonate. However, when it is burned at a high temperature you get a mix of calcium oxide, silica and magnesium oxide! The exact ingredients of Portland cement (with a bunch of impurities. This, when mixed with water will react to form calcium carbonate, cement. Now... what's even more interesting is thst not all wood forms these products. in the paper ash, pine and Douglas fir do but oak does not. So yes the pandoras box has been opened...

    So right now my theory on this whole thing is that tobacco either does burn to produce ash which contains the mix of chemicals which produce calcium carbonate or the tobacco does not burn hot enough to produce them and, instead, produces unreactive calcium carbonate. The acid test should tell me which of the two it is.

    Posted 3 months ago #
  27. dimm

    Dimm

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 107

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    The last paragraph should read: " So right now my theory on this whole thing is that tobacco either does NOT burn to produce ash which contains the mix of chemicals which produce calcium carbonate or the tobacco does not burn hot enough to produce them and, instead, produces unreactive calcium carbonate. The acid test should tell me which of the two it is".

    Posted 3 months ago #
  28. lifeon2

    lifeon2

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 344

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    ok so what kind of wood should we be burning? Also wouldnt this work just as well

    http://www.lowes.com/pd_89400-73069-1666-0408-2_0__?productId=3593040&Ntt=laticrete+unsanded+grout&pl=1&currentURL=%2Fpl__0__s%3FNtt%3Dlaticrete%2Bunsanded%2Bgrout&facetInfo=

    or even jb weld?

    You may call me "HerrDoctor"
    Posted 3 months ago #
  29. jaysin

    jaysin

    Member
    Joined: Feb 2012
    Posts: 1,087

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Surly u could sell it theres a sucker born every minute

    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
    Posted 3 months ago #
  30. bailey331

    bailey331

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 168

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Thanks for the information. I have an estate pipe I just got today that looks to need a little attention to the bottom of the bowl. I will give this a try and let you know.

    Posted 3 months ago #
  31. tokerpipes

    tokerpipes

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 1,510

    online

    Login to Send PM

    Realisticly couldnt you just put the ash in your bowl up to the level you desire and just add some water and let it dry? Or possibly add too much water and let it set till it dry/cured all the way?

    If you can't pack it, light it, and smoke it then why do it. It's a dieing art that must be rekindled in all of us as fortold by our forefathers.

    Words to live by for all pipe smokers.
    Posted 3 months ago #
  32. olderthandirt

    OTD

    Senior Member
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 2,175

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Well that's thinking outside the box toker.
    Would be akin to mixing cement for a fencepost in the hole rather than in a wheelbarrow.

    Give it a try and tell us how it works out!

    Posted 3 months ago #
  33. lordnoble

    lordnoble

    Mod
    Joined: Jul 2010
    Posts: 1,883

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I swear, I've read this thread twice and can't figure out.... Is Portland Cement just fireplace ash? So in theory, I can get a bag of Quikcrete and patch up the pits in my bowls? Should I be saving some of the fine ash from my outdoor fireplace? Or should I only be saving the ash from Douglas Fir or pine logs that I burn?

    -Jason

    unclearthur on high nicotine blends:
    A few will leave you wandering around wondering who you are .
    Posted 3 months ago #
  34. rhogg

    rhogg

    Member
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 240

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Portland cement is toxic. I would put it in a pipe.

    Posted 3 months ago #
  35. rhogg

    rhogg

    Member
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 240

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    The idea of burning down a forest to create a parking lot sounds like one hell of a misplaced science experiment that will likely not yield the desired results.

    Posted 3 months ago #
  36. lordnoble

    lordnoble

    Mod
    Joined: Jul 2010
    Posts: 1,883

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    The idea of burning down a forest to create a parking lot sounds like one hell of a misplaced science experiment that will likely not yield the desired results.

    I think you're on to something there! LOL!

    -Jason

    Posted 3 months ago #
  37. dimm

    Dimm

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 107

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Okay so filling up your pipe with dry ash and then putting some water in will not really work because if you've ever mixed pipe mud you know that a big pile of cigar ash makes a tiny little ball of putty. Also you would wanna mix it seperately to get the proportions right.

    On the topic of putting actual cement in a pipe I would not do that. Wood ash is not the same thing as regular Portland cement even though it is similar. Portland cement has lots of additives which wood ash does not. Portland cement is corrosive.

    Anyways I would love for you to experiment with differentt wood ashes and report your findings. After reading into just how complex this all is I think some trial and error is in krder. So let's hear how your pipe cement works out!

    Posted 3 months ago #
  38. rhogg

    rhogg

    Member
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 240

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I let burnt matches get in the mix and it seems to make it a little harder.

    Posted 3 months ago #
  39. oakbear

    oakbear

    Junior Member
    Joined: Dec 2011
    Posts: 77

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Anyone tried sodium silcate and activated charcoal for this?
    Or am i better with cement?

    I'm thinking of giving it a go for a pin hole in an antique briar...

    Posted 3 months ago #
  40. tokerpipes

    tokerpipes

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 1,510

    online

    Login to Send PM

    So i tried leaving some ash and adding some water to one of my MM cobs. I put a pipe cleaner in the shank so it was just in the opening of the bowl. Using a match stick I mixed it around a bit, once it was a little less squishy and more like a putty I used the tamper and my pinky to smooth it out. I let it dry for a week. IT WORKED. I will probably have to do this a few times to get it to the right level, but it does work.

    Posted 3 months ago #
  41. group4

    group4

    Member
    Joined: Aug 2011
    Posts: 130

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    My days as a potter reminded me that fireplace ash can be extremely caustic, due to high alkalinity. Before attempting more experiments I encourage you to do a little further chemical investigation. Good luck.

    Posted 3 months ago #
  42. User has not uploaded an avatar

    bobby46

    Probably Older Than You
    Joined: Feb 2012
    Posts: 223

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    My 2cents:
    Anyone against honey for break-in, tell it to yello-bole who ran ads in 1950's mags boasting their mfg process using it. I found it necessary for all my homemades carved off of my seasoned cherry tree logs. Without honey, any pipe made from cherry, black walnut or maple will have you your own mini-fireplace scent until carbon buildup. I read of maple syrup doing well; anything sugary/syrupy that you would eat may suffice for break-in.
    Briar doesn't really need it.

    My fireplace sometimes burns a parrafin log whose ash chemistry may be questionable. I'll stick to pipe mud from my own pipe ash. I've only used it in cobs, anyhow. Just my opinion..........

    Posted 2 months ago #
  43. bailey331

    bailey331

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 168

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Used your cement idea last night in an estate Whitehall I picked up a few weeks ago. the bottom of the bowl had several cracks in it but none that had gone all the way through. I packed and lined the bottom of the bowl with wood ash and spit. I formed an easy to work with putty and dried fast too. I let it sit over night to set up all the way and will most likely smoke that bad boy tonight. Thanks for the info. It was spot on.

    Posted 2 months ago #
  44. bentmike

    bentmike

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 496

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I just got a bent pot shape the other day and it looked like the vent hole was drilled just a touch too deep leaving a divot at the bottom of the bowl. I had just read your post so I asked my brother-in-law for some fine ash from his woodstove. I mixed with water until a thick paste developed and packed it into the little hole with a broken off cotton swab. Worked like a charm -now the bottom of the bowl transitions smoothly into the vent hole. Probably would have been fine as it was but little details like that irritate me and surly nasty dottle would have lodged in the hole.

    Very interesting post by the way.

    Posted 2 months ago #
  45. dimm

    Dimm

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 107

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I would like to agree with group4. Experimenting with science is fun but be careful. If I've learned anything from this its that not all woods are equal. You should not use ash if you don't know what wood it came from. I found some information online about woods used for smoking meats. It was a very large list of woods which were safe and woods which were not. I don't know how it relates to the safety of the ash. If anythingit simply goes to reenforce the notion that not all woods are equal. And that some are bad for you. Also make sure that only pure wood was used. I know that people burn scraps of anything in fireplaces. Paint, glues, varnished, and lots of other things can be very toxic for you.

    I actually like the idea of ash from matches qs it is something readily availabe to pipe smokers and obviously time tested as safe in a pipe.

    So be careful At the same time I know that people used to and still light their pipes by taking an embers from a fire and sticking it right in their pipes. So wood ash is not something that is historically foreign to your pipe.

    Posted 2 months ago #
  46. maineyachtie

    maineyachtie

    Senior Member
    Joined: Aug 2010
    Posts: 370

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Great thread Dimm, you're a bright guy.

    See what I did there?

    Anyway, very interesting topic. I appreciate your dedication and enthusiasm. For me though, I'm just gonna stick to pipe or cigar mud since I already know it's safe to smoke.

    Posted 2 months ago #
  47. wildcat

    wildcat

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 357

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Great thread Dimm

    +1
    I missed this earlier and I sure am glad I was directed her tonight! I have a bent Wally Frank Chadwick with an interior bowl crack or sand-pit that needs repair. As stated earlier, this would make a great sticky!

    "Let them all go to hell except cave 76!"

    "There can be no fear sir! Go forward with faith in the briar!!" OTD 2-15-12
    Posted 1 month ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.

 

 

    Back To Top  | Back to Forum Home Page

   Members Online Now
   chispa, pipedisciple, ichbinmuede, waznyf, sorringowl, taerin, sajgre, tokerpipes, briarbird, admin, frennchy11