I recently received my new IM Corona Old Boy and am now able to compare it to the other lighters I've tried. I thought it might be helpful for others who are in the market to compare the three.
The three lighters I will compare are my Zippo (with pipe insert), a Colibri Connaught II, and a IM Corona Old Boy. All of these pipes have a soft flame (as opposed to torch lighters which no one should use with a pipe) - but even still, not all are equal in that category.
Colibri Connaught II
There's lots to like about this lighter. One is the fuel window that lets you know how much fuel you have left. It has a built-in tamper (which I find very useful). It never needs flints since it uses a quartz ignition. Also the flame is angled, so it drops right into the pipe bowl. It has a bit of heft to it, definitely a good solid feel in the hand.
And even though this lighter broke on me recently, it did go almost 2 years with nary a problem and I intend to send it in for repair since it comes with a 2 year warranty (same as the Old Boy).
IM Corona Old Boy
Having used the Colibri for a while, I've noticed that there are some (minor) drawbacks with the Old Boy. No fuel window is one. And being an old style lighter, you need to raise the cap to allow the fuel to expel. This means that it stays lit even if you drop the lighter. Not a big deal I suppose, but the Colibri only stays lit if you depress the lever - so if you drop it, it immediately goes out.
But I have to say it has one *major* advantage. The flame is extremely gentle, more so than the Colibri. At first I wasn't sure just why, but I believe it's because the fuel vapor only "leaks" out whereas the Colibri "gushes" out and creates a hotter flame. It is also angled like the Colibri so it goes straight into the bowl and won't scorch the rim.
It also has a built-in tamper that works very well (a big plus in my book).
Zippo
This lighter is a favorite for many and there's good reason. These lighters were the mainstay for many people back in the day. They're inexpensive and still come with a lifetime warranty. My Dad had a zippo when I was growing up, so there's definitely a bit of nostalgia when I use this lighter.
But for me, they are not the "ultimate" pipe lighter. It has no tamper. The fuel has a strong odor and I can taste it when lighting my pipe. Not that objectionable, but it's there. Filling it is a bit of a pain compared to a butane lighter and it ran out of fuel pretty quickly (seemed to be more from evaporation that use). One other drawback is that it has a fairly large wick and so the flame is a bit unwieldy compared to the butane lighters.
Outdoors: All three lighters performed the same. None of of these is very easy to stay lit in a breeze, but none performed better than the other.
The Verdict
Out of these three, for me personally, the winner is the Old Boy and mainly for one important reason - the direct, yet very gentle flame. It doesn't over heat the tobacco like my Colibri did and it's more direct and in control than my zippo.
The three lighters I will compare are my Zippo (with pipe insert), a Colibri Connaught II, and a IM Corona Old Boy. All of these pipes have a soft flame (as opposed to torch lighters which no one should use with a pipe) - but even still, not all are equal in that category.
Colibri Connaught II
There's lots to like about this lighter. One is the fuel window that lets you know how much fuel you have left. It has a built-in tamper (which I find very useful). It never needs flints since it uses a quartz ignition. Also the flame is angled, so it drops right into the pipe bowl. It has a bit of heft to it, definitely a good solid feel in the hand.
And even though this lighter broke on me recently, it did go almost 2 years with nary a problem and I intend to send it in for repair since it comes with a 2 year warranty (same as the Old Boy).
IM Corona Old Boy
Having used the Colibri for a while, I've noticed that there are some (minor) drawbacks with the Old Boy. No fuel window is one. And being an old style lighter, you need to raise the cap to allow the fuel to expel. This means that it stays lit even if you drop the lighter. Not a big deal I suppose, but the Colibri only stays lit if you depress the lever - so if you drop it, it immediately goes out.
But I have to say it has one *major* advantage. The flame is extremely gentle, more so than the Colibri. At first I wasn't sure just why, but I believe it's because the fuel vapor only "leaks" out whereas the Colibri "gushes" out and creates a hotter flame. It is also angled like the Colibri so it goes straight into the bowl and won't scorch the rim.
It also has a built-in tamper that works very well (a big plus in my book).
Zippo
This lighter is a favorite for many and there's good reason. These lighters were the mainstay for many people back in the day. They're inexpensive and still come with a lifetime warranty. My Dad had a zippo when I was growing up, so there's definitely a bit of nostalgia when I use this lighter.
But for me, they are not the "ultimate" pipe lighter. It has no tamper. The fuel has a strong odor and I can taste it when lighting my pipe. Not that objectionable, but it's there. Filling it is a bit of a pain compared to a butane lighter and it ran out of fuel pretty quickly (seemed to be more from evaporation that use). One other drawback is that it has a fairly large wick and so the flame is a bit unwieldy compared to the butane lighters.
Outdoors: All three lighters performed the same. None of of these is very easy to stay lit in a breeze, but none performed better than the other.
The Verdict
Out of these three, for me personally, the winner is the Old Boy and mainly for one important reason - the direct, yet very gentle flame. It doesn't over heat the tobacco like my Colibri did and it's more direct and in control than my zippo.