Pipes Magazine » Pipe Tobacco Reviews

Search Forums  
   
Tags:  No tags yet. 

Match blends

(18 posts)
  • Started 1 month ago by trouttimes
  • Latest reply from virginialover
  1. trouttimes

    trouttimes

    Member
    Joined: Nov 2018
    Posts: 829

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I have tried 965 match and EMP match, not that bad as long as you don't smoke side by side with the original. What other matches have you guys tried the are close?

    Posted 1 month ago #
  2. shermnatman

    shermnatman

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2019
    Posts: 260

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Trout Times - I have tried many of the Match Blends offered over on P&C (Nightcap, 965, EMP, Flying Dutchman, Revelation, PA, Presbyterian, Elizabethan), and I have enjoyed ALL the match products I have tried thus far; however, I can only comment on the Match Prince Albert vs Original Price Albert in a side-by-side taste test I conducted - which while Match PA was "good", I found it more mellow, less nit-hit, and lacked a certain something in the satisfying punch which Original PA ALWAYS delivers. As PA ia my main daily smoke, I consider Match PA more like Albert's cool little brother.

    - Sherm Natman

    Posted 1 month ago #
  3. ray47

    ray47

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2015
    Posts: 1,086

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I bought some Hearth & Home Chatham Manor which is a match blend for Carter Hall and so far I'm not all that thrilled but I'm not giving up on it just yet.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  4. shermnatman

    shermnatman

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2019
    Posts: 260

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Ray47 - I am glad you mentioned the Hearth & Home Mid-Town match mixtures, as I am planning on doing the Carter Hall/Chatham Manor, as well as, the Kentucky Club/Derby Club, and of course, the Prince Albert/Prince Andrew match testing in side-by-sides as soon as I can get to them. - Sherm Natman

    Posted 1 month ago #
  5. prairiedruid

    prairiedruid

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jun 2015
    Posts: 1,647

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I don't know if it's close to the original but I do like ERR Match.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  6. cortezattic

    Cortez

    A part of the problem since he ...
    Joined: Nov 2009
    Posts: 14,147

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I like Sutliff's Match Elizabethan more than the original.

    I find myself sitting idly on the line dividing past and future,
    as if I could kill time without injuring eternity. -- Thoreau
    Posted 1 month ago #
  7. mikefu

    mikefu

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Mar 2018
    Posts: 713

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I don't know if it's close to the original but I do like ERR Match.

    I agree with this wholeheartedly, and also about preferring the Elizabethan Match to the original.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  8. jiminks

    JimInks

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2012
    Posts: 30,844

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    The Elizabethan Match is based on the Murray's version, which is infinitely better than the current version. That's why it's different than the current mix.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  9. jiminks

    JimInks

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2012
    Posts: 30,844

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Here's a link to my Match reviews. Some have been updated in the past couple of years, and those updates are at TR. But this may suffice as a guide for some who are interested.

    http://pipesmagazine.com/forums/topic/jims-sutliff-match-reviews

    Posted 1 month ago #
  10. mikefu

    mikefu

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Mar 2018
    Posts: 713

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Thanks Jim, that makes a lot of sense. The Match is way better than the recently discontinued tins, IMO. I also prefer ERR Match to Lane Ready Rubbed, by quite a margin, but I find the primary difference to be cut and richness of topping.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  11. jiminks

    JimInks

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Aug 2012
    Posts: 30,844

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I prefer Sutliff's ERR Match as well, and I say it's a closer match overall.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  12. alialansari

    Ali Alansari

    Junior Member
    Joined: Mar 2015
    Posts: 73

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    There's something I don't understand and I wish you guys would help me figure it out. When blends, like the Dunhill range, go out of production because the trademark owner decides to pull the plug, can't the factory keep on producing the same blends under a different name? In Dunhill's case, why doesn't the Orlik factory just use the same recipe with another name? Is it a patent or trademark issue that might encourage BAT to pursue legal action? If that's the case, has anyone of the big manufacturers not offered to buy the production license from BAT?

    Posted 1 month ago #
  13. ray47

    ray47

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Jul 2015
    Posts: 1,086

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Ray47 - I am glad you mentioned the Hearth & Home Mid-Town match mixtures, as I am planning on doing the Carter Hall/Chatham Manor, as well as, the Kentucky Club/Derby Club, and of course, the Prince Albert/Prince Andrew match testing in side-by-sides as soon as I can get to them. - Sherm Natman

    If your going on the assumption that Chatham Manor taste like Carter Hall you'll be disappointed. I can't speak for the other Mid-Town Matches.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  14. weezell

    weezell

    Preferred Member
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Posts: 8,965

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Prince Albert/Prince Andrew match
    Disappointing for me,still trying to muscle thru it...

    "the weez"...
    Posted 1 month ago #
  15. chasingembers

    Embers

    Captain Of The Black Frigate
    Joined: Nov 2014
    Posts: 14,947

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I prefer Sutliff's ERR Match as well, and I say it's a closer match overall.

    Same

    Damnation seize my soul if I give you quarters, or take any from you.
    -Edward Teach
    Posted 1 month ago #
  16. shermnatman

    shermnatman

    Member
    Joined: Jan 2019
    Posts: 260

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    Ray47 & Weezell - Thanks for that input. I have to say I am more than a bit surprised to learn this, as those Mid-town mixtures are specifically advertised as substitutes for their listed commercial ID counterparts. Thanks for the heads up! - Sherm Natmaan

    Posted 1 month ago #
  17. chilipalmer

    chilipalmer

    Member
    Joined: Aug 2017
    Posts: 108

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    I've tried most of the Sutliff match blends. Being an old school burley guy, they're right in my wheel house and I like them all; my favorites being the match for Briggs, Revelation, and Holiday mixtures. I've also tried the H&H Midtown blends. The Kentucky Club and Chestnut are very nice too.

    I would wholeheartedly recommend these blends to anyone who is interested in a good all-day smoke.

    Cheers,

    Chili

    “Pipe: a primary masculine symbol with authoritarian overtones but also indicative of reliability and contentment.”
    -The Dictionary of Visual Language, 1980
    Posted 1 month ago #
  18. virginialover

    virginialover

    Senior Member
    Joined: Mar 2016
    Posts: 437

    offline

    Login to Send PM

    "I like Sutliff's Match Elizabethan more than the original."

    +1

    Also I just tried 965 match and...nope.

    Posted 1 month ago #

Reply

You must log in to post.

 

 

    Back To Top  | Back to Forum Home Page

   Members Online Now
   monkeylyf, mikethompson, npod, pappymac, mtwaller