I'm deciding between two similar pipes for my next purchase, but I need some insight. Most of my pipes have good-sized chambers, and I find that by time I'm content with my smoke and ready to head back inside (usually around the 20-30 minute mark), there's often still 1/8 to 1/4 of the tobacco left in the bowl. Thus I'm thinking of starting to buy smaller pipes, but I suppose I could also just pack less tobacco. The thing is, my packing method that seems to work pretty well is based partially on measuring from the top of the bowl. Whenever I tried to simply pack less tobacco, I either pack too light or too hard and the airflow gets wonky.
Is buying smaller pipes the solution, or should I just learn to pack differently? Which of these pipes would be better if 20-30 minutes of smoking is my sweet spot? Specs:
- Pipe #1's bowl: outside height 1.91", inside depth 1.58", inside diameter 0.83".
- Pipe #2's bowl: outside height 1.43", inside depth 1.23", inside diameter 0.72".
And for you, how much do you think about bowl size when buying? Do you ever choose your pipe according to your ideal smoke length?
Thanks in advance.
(Edited title, please see rule number 9.
Thank you, Robert.)
Is buying smaller pipes the solution, or should I just learn to pack differently? Which of these pipes would be better if 20-30 minutes of smoking is my sweet spot? Specs:
- Pipe #1's bowl: outside height 1.91", inside depth 1.58", inside diameter 0.83".
- Pipe #2's bowl: outside height 1.43", inside depth 1.23", inside diameter 0.72".
And for you, how much do you think about bowl size when buying? Do you ever choose your pipe according to your ideal smoke length?
Thanks in advance.
(Edited title, please see rule number 9.
Thank you, Robert.)