Search results
SmokingPipes.com Updates
PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor
Site Sponsors
PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor
PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor
PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor
PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor
-
Charatan Size and Shapes Observation/Question
sorry for late responding. This is the other side of my pipe, Ken.- lucilucius
- Post #34
- Forum: British Pipes
-
Charatan Size and Shapes Observation/Question
my pre-Lane 102 Supreme, Ken has seen and talked about this before.- lucilucius
- Post #31
- Forum: British Pipes
-
-
Dunhill Shape 87 1919 Value
photos of my Dunhill Duke Street shape 65 as I have mentioned above:- lucilucius
- Post #35
- Forum: British Pipes
-
Dunhill Shape 87 1919 Value
I’m so curious to know how much you guys would be happy to spend on my Dunhill Duke Street in my topic below if you saw it somewhere: http://pipesmagazine.com/forums/topic/dunhill-duke-street-bruyere-pipe- lucilucius
- Post #26
- Forum: British Pipes
-
-
My New Dunhill CK Shell Patent 1950
beautiful tanshell you’ve got there. :)- lucilucius
- Post #21
- Forum: Pipe Talk
-
My New Dunhill CK Shell Patent 1950
@skaukatt I saw your pictures, interesting. @verporchting there would be a CK pops up here and there. Wait for your time then.. snap it.- lucilucius
- Post #17
- Forum: Pipe Talk
-
My New Dunhill CK Shell Patent 1950
@skaukatt there must be an A or R on your CK for sure? actually I’m looking for a Comoy’s 256 since Comoy’s is also my favourite brand. Sasieni, not really. I once tried to obtain some one-dot and eight-dot but at the end, I decided to let it go.- lucilucius
- Post #12
- Forum: Pipe Talk
-
My New Dunhill CK Shell Patent 1950
I remember a topic where someone links back to a 1933 CK on smokingpipes.- lucilucius
- Post #3
- Forum: Pipe Talk
-
My New Dunhill CK Shell Patent 1950
just won this Dunhill CK a few hours ago. CK has always been my favourite shape, I have another Bruyere in hand and now a Shell. Hope I could obtain a Root soon.- lucilucius
- Thread
- Replies: 25
- Forum: Pipe Talk
-
Some of my random pipes
out of terrible weather and boredom, I just take some of my favourite pipes out for cleaning. There are pre-1950 Charatan, pre-1960 Barling's, pre-1920 Dunhill, some A and C S. Bang. Hope it will be warmer soon.- lucilucius
- Thread
- Replies: 8
- Forum: Pipe Talk
-
-
Dunhill Duke Street Bruyere Pipe
just got on hand a 1915-1918 Dunhill Duke Street Bruyere shape 65 in prime condition. Sometimes I think I don't deserve this luck.- lucilucius
- Thread
- Replies: 11
- Forum: British Pipes
-
-
Orlik with no grade stamp
hi, with a round bowl, I would call it a fourshare. with a paneled bowl, I would call it a panel. :D- lucilucius
- Post #3
- Forum: British Pipes
-
Orlik with no grade stamp
well, I happened to get a hold of this foursquare Orlik. Based on the stamp LONDON MADE, I'm kinda sure that pipe is pre-Cadogan, however, there is no stamp whatsoever to indicate the grade of this pipe, as you can see in the picture. is this the same thing like Lane-era Charatans sometimes...- lucilucius
- Thread
- Replies: 10
- Forum: British Pipes
-
Stanwell shape 20 - What do you think about it?
I also do agree that early Stanwell pipes are excellent. The one in this picture is a remarkable example, simple S, no crown, as light as a feather and smoke like a charm. :wink:- lucilucius
- Post #9
- Forum: Pipe Talk
-
Stanwell shape 20 - What do you think about it?
one of my pipe friends said that 20 may be the best shape ever designed by Sixten Ivarsson while he was still with Stanwell. I totally agree with him. how about you, what do you think about it? It'd be wonderful to get to see some of your old Stanwell pipes here also. cheers,- lucilucius
- Thread
- Replies: 13
- Forum: Pipe Talk
-
Just a Typical S. Bang
and another one, just not a classic shape, but a classic Bang.- lucilucius
- Post #9
- Forum: Pipe Talk