(Review) Park-Lane Turkish Mystery

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Drucquers Banner

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

pstlpkr

Lifer
Dec 14, 2009
9,694
31
Birmingham, AL
Herbinedave asked me to review Park-Lane Turkish Mystery. My first thoughts were: "Ok sure. Why not?" My second thought... "I don't smoke enough English blends to pick up on the nuances of the blend." Third thought... "Maybe that's a good thing."
I began by reviewing some of the characteristics embodied by the various tobaccos used in this blend. Virginias are medium sweet, a type of tobacco with which I am familiar. Perique; commonly called "peppery" but is rather a spicy-light-vinegar-tannin filled flavor. (I love me some Perique, and something I know intimately), Latakia; with its typically smoky/campfire aroma. Lastly; Turkish tobaccos characteristically have a light citrusy, slightly acidic flavor, with low nicotine content as a result of it being a sun-cured tobacco. Now that I’m familiar with the potential flavor and aromatic characteristics of this blend’s elements, it’s time to proceed.
That done, the next step would be take a look and assess its appearance and moisture. Generally a very dark brown and black Virginia, Latakia, and Perique interspersed with the light/bright brown sun-cured Turkish tobaccos. Thin ribbon cut, clumps when pinched so I would call this Medium-moist, and has a remarkably silky feel.
The pouch note:

I took several deep inhalations before I could began to distinguish the various elements. This particular combination of tobaccos produces an amalgam of campfire, lemon-zest, earthy, and sweetness. Each element of the blend adds its particular characteristic to the blend and balances well. While the Latakia is defiantly present, it was the loamy-earthy-tannins of the Perique that to me characterize the basic note. The sweetness of the Virginia and the citrusy Turkish are present and work well together not in contrast to, but in concert with the Latakia and Perique.
While considering how to proceed I decided on smoking two bowls, each to be packed with the three step method. One straight out of the pouch, the second dried for at least an hour. The reasoning behind this decision is a simple one. In general terms most English smokers prefer to smoke their tobaccos on the drier side, and being primarily an Aromatic smoker I tend to smoke without drying. So, I decided to try both dry and moist in a medium sized bowl. The un-dried tobacco is to be smoked in my Bjarne Free Form. The dry is to be smoked in my Aldo Velani Bulldog. Wooden matches. I decided on bottled water to drink.
The Un-dried:

The Char-light was a little stubborn, but had a full-on flavor of Perique. Tamp then the True-light. It was not so problematic. Almost immediately, all the elements sprang to life. It was slightly sweet, with a mild citrus "twang", smoky, and spicy. The smoke was dense and flavorful with no bite, moderate nicotine content and very satisfying. About half way through the bowl the Latakia seems to be taking over, but the sweetness of the Virginia is still present. Perique seems to be no longer present, and the Turkish seems to have diminished its influence as well. What remained was a small amount of dottle and mostly white ash over the dottle. Not too bad, but not what I'd call a home run either, and I did have a bit of gurgle which reminded me to slow down.
The dry:

I decided to wait a bit longer than an hour because the tobacco didn’t dry as quickly as one might have expected... Then again we did have a very powerful and slow moving thunderstorm this evening. The temperature dropped more than twenty degrees but the humidity climbed to 100 % out of doors, and 53% in doors... Not a comfortable evening.
The Char-light was different than the un-dried, in-as-much-as the initial flavor profile was much sharper, more of the Latakia was evident. The Perique I believe suffers from the drying process. The mouth feel of the smoke was much drier, and it required a lot more hydration on my part. The True-light wasn’t much better. I smoked the blend as comfortably as I could. I did enjoy it, but not as much as the un-dried. The flavors were basically the same, except I didn't taste as much of the Perique as I did with the un-dried. And, there was a soapy element that emerged that I hadn't noticed when I smoked the first bowl, probably from the Latakia. I do have one more observation to make. When I puffed then released the smoke through my nose... it burned a bit. I didn't have that sensation while smoking the un-dried. The character of the Turkish Mystery, to me, was diminished by allowing the tobacco to dry.
Conclusions:

Overall; I enjoyed Park-Lane Turkish Mystery very much. I prefer it moist. It was earthier and definitely milder when smoked straight out of the pouch. This could be attributable to my affinity for Perique (which loses some flavor potency when it becomes too dry). It was easier to light and smoke, but I believe the flavor profile suffers a bit when smoked dry. The overall taste was loamy, smoky, lightly-sweet and had an accent/hint of citrus from the Turkish tobacco (no mystery there). If I were to use a five point scale; I'd say... Pouch note 4.5, Room note (depends on who you ask) The War Department 0.5, my daughter's friend 5.0, my personal overall opinion... 4.0+. In My Humble Opinion a good go-to smoke for those who prefer English blends. And, for us Aromatic smokers Park-Lane Turkish Mystery is a nice change of pace and worth keeping a few ounces on hand.
:puffy:

 

cortezattic

Lifer
Nov 19, 2009
15,147
7,642
Chicago, IL
Great review, Lawrence! Your stuff is always a good read. Your observation that Perique's flavor fades when too dry explains a lot that I failed to pick up on with my tobaccos, and my penchant for smoking leaf on the dry side. I had heard though, that Orientals, though almost always sun cured, were low in nicotine because they are grown in nitrogen poor soils. (I also read that tobacco produces more nicotine, a natural insecticide, if the plant is injured in some way -- either by being chewed on, or "topped" in agriculture.) Any thoughts?

 

ssjones

Moderator
Staff member
May 11, 2011
19,037
13,159
Covington, Louisiana
postimg.cc
Well done sir. I might have to give this a try on my next trip to Park Lane. Interesting observation on the moistness of the Perique. I don't like a lot of Perique so I suspect a dry blend would suit my taste.
Is there a particular blend that might be similar? I always find that kind of comment helpful in steering me to a new blend.

 

pstlpkr

Lifer
Dec 14, 2009
9,694
31
Birmingham, AL
Orientals, though almost always sun cured, were low in nicotine because they are grown in nitrogen poor soils.
That is probably true Cortez. That thought never occurred to me. I attempted to wrap my head around a lot of information in a short period of time.

Other than that I'm glad you guys enjoyed my humble rendering.
As for doing more... I have several on the list, but a limited amount of time... It usually takes a couple of evenings to write one, plus smoking time.
Hey Al. Of the "English" blends that I have on hand, (3 or 4) I think, (And don't hold me to this.) that Dunhill Night Cap is similar. But, I'm no expert on "English" blend... There are a several members that have much-much more knowledge than I do.

:puffy:

 

topd

Lifer
Mar 23, 2012
1,745
11
Emerson, Arkansas
Lawrence..... You write well! And as a Hard Core English devotee I'm going to have to try this tobacco.
(I'd love to see you write a review on, say having a wonderful evening with the farrier sex. The pouch note, the un-dry, etc......)

"You made my mouth water with the tobacco review... Holly Molly!"

 

spartan

Lifer
Aug 14, 2011
2,963
7
I enjoyed this review very much. Sounds like something I will be trying.
I think the wet vs dry tobacco approach is extremely important when reviewing the smoking properties and flavor profiles the tobacco can produce.
And I thank you for taking the time to do it. :clap:

 

schmitzbitz

Lifer
Jan 13, 2011
1,165
2
Port Coquitlam, B.C.
Excellent review Lawrence; I really like how you defined the difference between smoking the blend wet and dry, and how you took the time and explained your procedure at length. Well done sir!

 
Status
Not open for further replies.