No, the reality that smoking is unhealthy and costs society is what killed it. Eventually, all tobacco manufacturing will be banned, one way or the other.Wokery killed Mac Baren, then.
Sounds like if we had to pick a villain in all of this, it would be the government. Big surprise.
No, the reality that smoking is unhealthy and costs society is what killed it. Eventually, all tobacco manufacturing will be banned, one way or the other.
I would agree that if the company had been handed down to someone passionate about tobacco, there would have been a chance at continued profitability.What I got from the statement was a tale as old as time: the business transfers to family when the old man passes away and the family proceeds to "do it their way" and run it into the ground. Profits trump passion. The same thing is happening at Gawith, currently.
But in this case, probably wise. There was 1 tobacco man in the ownership group and that individual died leaving no one left in the group a tobacco person. It's probably not wise for a bunch of investors to continue to own something they know nothing about especially when it can be converted into a bucket of cash for other investing interests. Can't blame them on that one.Bankers on the BoD certainly didn't help. Their myopic thinking never brings out a company's best.
Point taken, but depressedly so.But in this case, probably wise. There was 1 tobacco man in the ownership group and that individual died leaving no one left in the group a tobacco person. It's probably not wise for a bunch of investors to continue to own something they know nothing about especially when it can be converted into a bucket of cash for other investing interests. Can't blame them on that one.
Yeah, I didn’t say it would be practical or effective, but it’s already happening. Just ask the frog in the pot.Just like with drugs and alcohol? I look forward to the day prohibition comes for tobacco. I live in a prime tobacco-growing area and there are tens of thousands of acres to plant clandestine crops.
AbsolutelySounds like if we had to pick a villain in all of this, it would be the government. Big surprise.
Sounds like we are bringing old school nascar and speak easys back!Just like with drugs and alcohol? I look forward to the day prohibition comes for tobacco. I live in a prime tobacco-growing area and there are tens of thousands of acres to plant clandestine crops.
I would probably do the same in their shoes. As I understand it, they are not the BoD of the company, they are the BoD of the trust, and they have a responsibility to the trust beneficiaries to make sure the assets are not squandered. Could they comfortably feel that Mac Baren was a prudent investment? I'd have a hard time making the case for that.Bankers on the BoD certainly didn't help. Their myopic thinking never brings out a company's best.
Unfortunately whether we agree or not, or like it or not, this is more or less a true statement. We may love our pastime, habit, hobby, what-have-you, but we have to get over ourselves thinking it is something beneficial or altruistic or romantic. That’s what we think. We can hold out against the tide for a long while, but the inevitable is the inevitable. Enjoy yourselves for as long as it may last. Peace, brothers.No, the reality that smoking is unhealthy and costs society is what killed it. Eventually, all tobacco manufacturing will be banned, one way or the other.
Unfortunate for us. But, yes, logical for the contrary view.I would probably do the same in their shoes. Add I understand it, they are not the BoD of the company, they are the BoD of the trust, and they have a responsibility to the trust beneficiaries to make sure the assets are not squandered. Could they comfortably feel that Mac Baren was a present investment? I'd have a hard time making the case for that.