Hi gang,
As part of my participation in the Tobacco Pax/Pub Crawl started elsewhere on the forums I'll be chiming in weekly with a snapshot review of the tobacco being sampled. Now these snapshot reviews are simply a gut-check review after a couple bowls. They aren't exhaustive multi-tin examinations, and are only my opinion.
Caveats aside, here goes.
Mac Baren HH Old Dark Fired
Tobacco: Virginia & Burley
Cut/Style: Flake
Age: 1 year in tin. Some plume/crystal forming.
Aroma: Burnt sugar, walnut, baking bread, slight tangy quality
Drying: Smokeybear opened the tin on Tuesday and put six flakes in a sandwich bag for me. I went directly from bag to bowl on Thursday night.
Pipe: Ryan Alden Canadian, Group 4(ish) sized bowl
Prep: Rubbed out, 3 stage stuff method to 1/8" from bowl rim to allow for expansion, even draw pre-light; like drinking chocolate milk through a straw.
Charring light: Good expansion, tobacco took the light well and tamped evenly. Nice sweet aromatics on this light, tangy quality coming through.
True light through first third: Baking bread notes from aroma turn into toasted nut in the top third of the bowl. The sweets stay forward and I continue to get a tangy note attached to the sweets of the Virginias and Burleys. The smoke is light and sweet.
Second third: The flavour becomes more homogeneous and more robust with less individual flavour character, tangy quality diminishes and the bowl takes on more of a round burnt nut sweetness, an earthy note begins to develop. Smoke consistency becomes thicker and slightly acrid, body is more full.
Bottom third: This bowl flattened out for me in flavour and didn't deliver the complexity in the bottom third that it did in the top-third. Smoke body/consistency continued to climb, but the individual flavour notes were harder to discern, bottom third delivered earthy and burnt nut character.
This wasn't a stand out smoke for me. I will continue to smoke the rest of the sample I have, but based on my first snapshot of this tobacco I likely won't be rushing to pick up a tin. As I begin to define the tobaccos which interest me I find myself leaning into blends with Perique and/or Orientals, I think that might be why I found this tobacco lacking.
Cheers,
-- Pat
As part of my participation in the Tobacco Pax/Pub Crawl started elsewhere on the forums I'll be chiming in weekly with a snapshot review of the tobacco being sampled. Now these snapshot reviews are simply a gut-check review after a couple bowls. They aren't exhaustive multi-tin examinations, and are only my opinion.
Caveats aside, here goes.
Mac Baren HH Old Dark Fired
Tobacco: Virginia & Burley
Cut/Style: Flake
Age: 1 year in tin. Some plume/crystal forming.
Aroma: Burnt sugar, walnut, baking bread, slight tangy quality
Drying: Smokeybear opened the tin on Tuesday and put six flakes in a sandwich bag for me. I went directly from bag to bowl on Thursday night.
Pipe: Ryan Alden Canadian, Group 4(ish) sized bowl
Prep: Rubbed out, 3 stage stuff method to 1/8" from bowl rim to allow for expansion, even draw pre-light; like drinking chocolate milk through a straw.
Charring light: Good expansion, tobacco took the light well and tamped evenly. Nice sweet aromatics on this light, tangy quality coming through.
True light through first third: Baking bread notes from aroma turn into toasted nut in the top third of the bowl. The sweets stay forward and I continue to get a tangy note attached to the sweets of the Virginias and Burleys. The smoke is light and sweet.
Second third: The flavour becomes more homogeneous and more robust with less individual flavour character, tangy quality diminishes and the bowl takes on more of a round burnt nut sweetness, an earthy note begins to develop. Smoke consistency becomes thicker and slightly acrid, body is more full.
Bottom third: This bowl flattened out for me in flavour and didn't deliver the complexity in the bottom third that it did in the top-third. Smoke body/consistency continued to climb, but the individual flavour notes were harder to discern, bottom third delivered earthy and burnt nut character.
This wasn't a stand out smoke for me. I will continue to smoke the rest of the sample I have, but based on my first snapshot of this tobacco I likely won't be rushing to pick up a tin. As I begin to define the tobaccos which interest me I find myself leaning into blends with Perique and/or Orientals, I think that might be why I found this tobacco lacking.
Cheers,
-- Pat