Disclaimer: The following in no way reflects on the seller of the pipe or anyone who has done the extensive research that I am questioning. It is purely my own speculation for informational purposes only.
I'm probably way off base but I saw an auction tonight that got me to thinking. I would like to challenge the assertion that John Peel pipes were all made by B. Barling. The evidence is this, a pipe recently presented on eBay by the great repairman and carver Tim West seems to bear the stamping of a Comoy's product. See the picture below.
Now this pipe is stamped shape 27 in a font that was used primarily by Comoy's and GBD, if my research is correct. The number is consistent with a Comoy's saddle bit billiard designation. Now this is not a saddle bit but it has a few indications, the 2-tone shank is one, that the stem might be a replacement. That, as well as the shape, is evident in this picture.
Now It might be just me but this seems a bit too much of a coincidence so I was just wondering what you all think. I know...why the he** does it matter right? It doesn't. I just love research and finding things that may have been missed or misinterpreted. Now I admit there are many that are stamped B. Barling and many of those have shape codes not consistent with Barling. I also admit that I may be way off in left field here as one pipe does not make or break a well established assertion.
Now for a feedback request. Am I missing something obvious? Is the blast more consistent with Barling or something obvious like that? I'll shut up now but here is the link to the original auction.
I'm probably way off base but I saw an auction tonight that got me to thinking. I would like to challenge the assertion that John Peel pipes were all made by B. Barling. The evidence is this, a pipe recently presented on eBay by the great repairman and carver Tim West seems to bear the stamping of a Comoy's product. See the picture below.

Now this pipe is stamped shape 27 in a font that was used primarily by Comoy's and GBD, if my research is correct. The number is consistent with a Comoy's saddle bit billiard designation. Now this is not a saddle bit but it has a few indications, the 2-tone shank is one, that the stem might be a replacement. That, as well as the shape, is evident in this picture.

Now It might be just me but this seems a bit too much of a coincidence so I was just wondering what you all think. I know...why the he** does it matter right? It doesn't. I just love research and finding things that may have been missed or misinterpreted. Now I admit there are many that are stamped B. Barling and many of those have shape codes not consistent with Barling. I also admit that I may be way off in left field here as one pipe does not make or break a well established assertion.
Now for a feedback request. Am I missing something obvious? Is the blast more consistent with Barling or something obvious like that? I'll shut up now but here is the link to the original auction.