Jim's GLP Renaissance Reserve Review.

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Drucquers Banner

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
65,761
682,431
Having very recently smoked the original Renaissance, whose formula was duplicated for this limited revival, I find few differences between the two. The very smokey, woody Syrian latakia has a light dryness, and is a little more noticeable than the Cyprian, which has a little sweetness along with the smoke and wood. The rich Orientals are woody with some earth, a touch of sour, and a mild to medium spiciness that playfully tingles the tongue. As with the original, the Orientals compete with and compliment the latakias. The red Virginia is tangy, dark fruit sweet and earthy with a bare spice note. It takes a lead over the other Virginias, though the aged version is mildly tangier. The matured Virginias have a gentle fermented stewed dark fruitiness, and vies with the red for attention. Third place in the Virginia line is the gold Virginia which offers light grass and citrus. The nic-hit is mild to medium. The strength is medium, and the taste is just past that. There’s no chance of bite, and no harsh or dullness to be found. A slow puffing cadence and a wide bowl is recommended to fully capture the complexities of this mixture.
It is just a little more latakia forward than the original, as well as tad less earthy, but that’s because I was smoking an aged 2004 version where the matured sweetness and earth of the Virginias came forward just a tad more, and the latakias had lightly mellowed. The nuance of taste in the Renaissance Reserve is a little more obvious and fresher because aging rounded off a few characteristics of the varietals. However this is very close to that aged product, and the differences are minor. Well balanced, complex, and a little dry in the tin, it burns at a reasonable pace with a very smooth, cool, clean consistent deep flavor. There is a mild creaminess here that’s just a hair more conspicuous than in the original. Requires few relights, and leaves virtually no moisture in the bowl. The smokey, woody, sweet, slightly sour and moderately spicy after taste pleasantly lingers. The campfire room note will linger, too. It’s not quite an all day smoke unless you are an experienced smoker, but is certainly repeatable if you are not.

 

prairiedruid

Lifer
Jun 30, 2015
2,064
1,396
Thanks Jim, your words carry a lot of weight with me since your tobacco reviews have helped me find some great blends. Now time to line up all my shell corporations to buy all 500 tins on Tuesday!

 
Jun 27, 2016
1,280
127
JimInks, I tagged your post by accident in an attempt to search the site to see if you had reviewed Wilderness, since this sounds like it could be a similar smoke. Ended up finding your review on TR but how do they compare? I can't seem to remove that tag, either.

 

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
65,761
682,431
As McClelland and GLP use different sources for their tobaccos, I would say they are different enough that your personal taste would dictate what you prefer. The GLP RR has a little more complexity in my opinion.

 
Jun 27, 2016
1,280
127
JimInks

As McClelland and GLP use different sources for their tobaccos, I would say they are different enough that your personal taste would dictate what you prefer. The GLP RR has a little more complexity in my opinion.
Having not tried any GLP tobaccos yet, would trying Union Square tell me a little about the VAs in this one? I also have some Embarcadero, Westminster and Gaslight. Thanks for any insight into if trying any of these would tell me about the VAs and maybe a little about the orientals in the Renaissance Reserve. :worship:

 

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
65,761
682,431
In some ways, Union Square is instructive regarding individual flavors of the red and bright Virginias (though the proportions are different), but I can't improve on my description of them in my review. And I have already written all I can about what the Orientals do in this blend. My review provides a guide to what I observed when I have smoked it, and really, you'll just have to decide on whether or not what I had to say fits your taste profile. I can't tell you more than I already have.

 

gsmunoz

Starting to Get Obsessed
Apr 30, 2016
153
0
Thanks JimInks. As always your wordsmithing has made my desire to acquire this extremely limited tobacco go from red to white hot.
I will be on pins and needles Tuesday morning...
I hope you don't mind me asking, but I am curious about something. With the vast number of tobaccos you have sampled over the years, have you run across anything that is in the same realm as Gaslight? It is my absolute all time #1 favorite. I am just curious what else is out there within the same spectrum.
Thanks for your time and contribution to this forum JimInks!

 

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
65,761
682,431
Gsmunoz: I thank you for the kind words. There are English blends that have some resemblance to Gaslight, which is to be expected in the sense that it takes certain tobaccos to make an English blend. Offhand, I can't think of any English I ever tried that made think it was like Gaslight, so I'll have to say I haven't.

 
Jun 27, 2016
1,280
127
JimInks

In some ways, Union Square is instructive regarding individual flavors of the red and bright Virginias (though the proportions are different), but I can't improve on my description of them in my review. And I have already written all I can about what the Orientals do in this blend. My review provides a guide to what I observed when I have smoked it, and really, you'll just have to decide on whether or not what I had to say fits your taste profile. I can't tell you more than I already have.
Ok thanks JimInks. You are number 1. Sounds like smoking some Union Square might be helpful to me, aside maybe from the more aged/fermented VA component that was mentioned. I guess I'm most concerned about the stewed fruit taste. I like that if it's hanging out in the background, or at least balanced with some other flavors, which it sounds like it is here, but when I hear stewed fruit, I get worried and think of something like special latakia flake which was really way too sweet for me in that stewed plumb or fruit sense. Sounds like if I think of some turkish blends or maybe smyrna, that might fill in some of the main flavors for the orientals. I read some of the reviews for the original Renaissance also. Just trying to decide if I will make a play for a couple tins, or not to worry about it. :puffpipe:

 

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
65,761
682,431
The stewed fruit notes are not strong; they are complimentary. Fermentation in this case indicates a very light aged quasi-wine sweetness to the fruit. In some blends, it's stronger, but here it's fairly mild. I already described what the Orientals do. My feeling is that if you like English blends with complexity, you ought to like Renaissance Reserve.

 

crashthegrey

Lifer
Dec 18, 2015
4,010
4,483
42
Cobleskill, NY
www.greywoodie.com
Based on this review, I don't care what people think. I only managed to get one tin, so rather than wait, I'm going to go ahead and open it. Maybe I'll be good and jar the rest for the cellar, but it depends on how much I enjoy it. It doesn't really matter if it's a once in a lifetime smoke if I enjoy it at the time.

 

codecreatively

Can't Leave
Sep 17, 2014
329
2
Smoked a bit of it last night, but it was directly after a bowl of Dunbar. Palate may have been compromised. It wasn't my favorite, I'm going to finish the bowl after work today. It's in a Dunhill pot, nice wide bowl.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.