Jim's C&D Warped: The Haunting Cake (Small Batch) 2025 Review.

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
70,145
801,985
This goes on sale tomorrow at 10 a.m. EST.

The year 2023 AA grade Dominican Criollo cigar leaf provides a wealth of peat, cedar, floralness, smoke, bread, leather, herbs, earth, vegetative grass, sourness, some sugar, mild fermented tart citrus, spice, tea, coffee, and light creamy butter notes as the lead component. The unsweetened Dominican black cavendish offers very mild tart and tangy citrus, vegetative grass, earth, wood, peat, bread, sugar, leather, cream, and light smoky cigar. Due to it having several similar characteristics of the Criollo, I can’t accurately determine its effect on the proceedings. The 2023 Canadian bright Virginia produces some tart citrus, sour lemon, grass, floralness, spice, vegetation, mild sugar, and light acidity as a noticeable supporting player. It’s a step ahead of the red Virginias due to its high floral and citrus qualities. The 2013, 2019, and 2023 stoved and unstoved red Virginias supply an abundance of tart and tangy citrus, sugar, bread, grass, some stewed fruit, wood, earth, floralness, mild vegetation, spice, and a vinegar note in a secondary support role. The strength and taste levels are filling. The nic-hit is just shy of the center of medium to strong. No chance of bite or harshness. Has a few small rough notes since there’s no toppings. This easily broken apart crumble cake is mildly moist, and I saw no need to dry it. Well balanced with subtle complexity, it burns cool, clean, and a tad slow with a mostly consistent smoky cigar, sour, floral, spicy, herbal, mildly sweet, lightly bitter, savory flavor that extends to the pleasantly long lasting after taste. The sour, cigar-like, floral, spicy, sweet room notes are pungent. Barely leaves any dampness in the bowl. It requires a couple more than an average number of relights. Not an all day smoke, but it is repeatable. It’s the strongest version by a small margin. I recommend a wide bowl, and no more than a medium one for this blend. Four stars out of four.
©Jim Amash 2025.
 

Val

Starting to Get Obsessed
Sep 18, 2019
227
467
Thank you for another great review Jim! The last batch you gave 3 stars and the ready rubbed before that you gave 2 stars. Here we have 4 stars with this version, can you speak to its bump in performance?
 

JimInks

Sultan of Smoke
Aug 31, 2012
70,145
801,985
Thank you for another great review Jim! The last batch you gave 3 stars and the ready rubbed before that you gave 2 stars. Here we have 4 stars with this version, can you speak to its bump in performance?
I've asked myself the very same question. I didn't go back and read my old reviews until I finished writing this one, which is my long standing review policy. But, my memory of them was pretty good so I felt confident about comparing them before looking back to my reviews of the earlier versions. What I mostly thought about in regard to comparisons while reviewing this one was that I didn't give four stars to the previous versions, and this one seemed to be a better entry in the series. It has a better balance for some reason.

I think that the different crop years of the varietals are probably the reason why because they are not exactly same as before. Maybe there were some small adjustments that make a difference? I notice a little difference in the bright Va. this time so it may be a different bright Va. The red Va.s seem a little sweeter, too. Dunno what else to tell you because I haven't definitively figured it out myself.
 
Last edited: