Already own a Holsun 507c with the shake awake feature which I really love.. Thinking of getting a Trijicon for another weapon. I'm looking for feedback from somebody that has used both and what your thoughts are Thanks in advance.
What specifically are you looking for thoughts on?Already own a Holsun 507c with the shake awake feature which I really love.. Thinking of getting a Trijicon for another weapon. I'm looking for feedback from somebody that has used both and what your thoughts are Thanks in advance.
I have the Trijicon HD Night Sights on a few of my Glocks. They’ve been durable, reliable, and provide quick target acquisition. They generally have a lifespan of 15 yrs, but I have a couple going on 20 yrs and the tritium still illuminates.
Go with the tritium.
You are mistaken.I may be mistaken, but the fella is not talking about Tritium, but red dot sights, also known as "emitter sights" where a tiny red dot is projected on a glass lens. It gives an appearance of using a laser without projecting an actual dot on the surface of a target.
You are mistaken.
You are mistaken.
Professionals do not rely on batteries and uncertainty
I patronize a gun shop where I’m the only one there that can appreciate the difference between a Philadelphia made A.H. Fox and a Fox Model B.I know what I said. Having installed
tritium to nearly 300 Glock pistols as an Armorer I said, “Go with the tritium.”
Iron sights are always the choice for a pistol in daylight - in darkness the tritium dots provide a secondary aiming method, albeit not as precise as acquiring a proper site picture.
I say this because installed and properly adjusted they are impervious to being knocked about.
Professionals do not rely on batteries and uncertainty —If you’re a recreational shooter, by all means. Enjoy yourself.
I stand by my original answer.
“Go with the tritium.”