Erik Stokkebye's 1931

Log in

SmokingPipes.com Updates

Watch for Updates Twice a Week

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

PipesMagazine Approved Sponsor

Status
Not open for further replies.

shutterbugg

Lifer
Nov 18, 2013
1,451
22
I received a sample of this a few weeks ago and fell in love with it. Had to wait a while till it came back in stock but now I have a few tins on hand, so I decided to write a review on it. I'm not one of those who can describe tobacco in terms of things it doesn't contain (like figs and raisins for example). But here goes:
First of all, I would classify 1931 as a "natural aromatic". By that I mean it doesn't taste or smell like it's topped with something recognizable like liquor or fruit or chocolate. I would describe the aroma as "old time classic pipe smoke". Reminds me of smelling pipe smoke as a kid. Just a nice, mellow, pleasant aroma that says

"pipe".
It's a flake, composed of black cavendish, VA and Burley. The tin note is remarkably like the room note...sweet but not cloying, with a nice natural tobacco aroma. Moisture was perfect right out of the tin. The flakes are about 3" long and fold and stuff easily. The only problem is, even folded in half it needs a rather deep bowl. For a shallower bowl, one would either have to fold it again, or cut the flakes in half before folding. I haven't tried rubbing it out yet, but probably will continue to fold them. With a few loose strands on top to help get it lit, it burns evenly and cool and dry right down to the bottom with (for me) no relights. Small sips produce a goodly amount of smoke, which I like. I don't care for blends that produce very little smoke. And for an aro, it has a nice nic content. My only gripe with my previous go-to aro (a black cav) was that it had practically no nic. As I mentioned, a full-length flake fits best in a deep bowl, and I find that 1931 burns so slowly and produces so much smoke that a small bowl is fully satisfying. I loaded up a Peterson Darwin Rusticated and found that it was too much. It took well over 2 hours to finish it, and I would have been satisfied with half that. It's a "rich" tobacco, and with the nic content, a little goes a long way. Another thing I like with this blend is that the constituents are well-married, so the taste and aroma remains steady throughout the bowl, with only a slight strengthening as it progresses. I'm not one who likes the taste to change much during a bowl, and this one doesn't.
In summation, if someone were to say they were a non-aro smoker looking to try an aro, 1931 would be my recommendation. It is somewhat expensive at nearly $18 a tin, but it's a 100g tin so really not that costly compared to my other go-tos, Royal Yacht and Three Nuns. A bit more expensive than Nightcap.

 

woodsroad

Lifer
Oct 10, 2013
13,011
22,114
SE PA USA
1614361_10203291613760563_859713440_o.jpg


 

dmcmtk

Lifer
Aug 23, 2013
3,672
1,709
Great review, I was sent a sample of 1882, and liked it enough to order a couple of tins. I think these Erik Stokkebye tobaccos are definitely worth a try.

 

ohiopuffer

Can't Leave
May 18, 2012
351
0
I have some of this but have not smoked any yet now I am going to have to crack open a tin. :puffy:

 
K

klause

Guest
Cracking review - thanks for that.
I've been meaning to try this for quite some time - you may just have given me the push I need. Ta!

 

stbruno70

Part of the Furniture Now
Jul 9, 2013
580
238
1931 is a fine flake with a somewhat old-fashioned taste due to a very light "essence" added to it. Whatever that may be, it is not intrusive or unpleasant.
I have a few tins for ageing in the cellar and will eagerly anticipate seeing how it changes over time.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.