"Barrel aging and the Lincoln county process both in involve the same concept - exposing freshly distilled white whiskey to charred hardwood to mellow the alcohol burn and otherwise improve the rough edges. The idea behind the Lincoln county process is getting that result faster. A lot of us think it ends up flattening the flavor in the long run."
Adam, if the Lincoln County Process makes the juice smoother in less time then how come the three expressions of American Eagle are aged 4,8 and 12 years? As it happens, they are the only bottles of American whiskies in my collection (34) that actually have an age statement!
Also you say the LCP flattens the flavour of the finished product whilst also claiming to be partial to Gentleman Jack as I am too. I also have 'smooth' American spirits that as far as I am aware didn't go through the LCP, Bulleit Rye I had last night is a perfect example.
It just seems that because American Eagle is owned by a British company (despite being an all American product) folks want to denounce it without ever trying it. If I were able I would gladly supply you with a sample of their three expressions so as you could give an informed view as to its quality or otherwise, alas that is not practicable.
Regards,
Jay.?
Jay, I did not mean to imply anything negative at all about the American Eagle bourbon, and if it was practical, as you said, I would happily try a dram of each, and I would appreciate the kind offer. I also respect British distilling, and it's nice to hear that there is a demand for bourbon in the U.K. even with all that good single malt available. I have no objection to a British company buying some American bourbon, bottling it, and importing it to the U.K.
I suppose I did not make my point very well, but my point is mainly that my objection to the Lincoln county process and the "Tennessee" label is mostly political, and it's based on a certain attitude among distillers and politicians in Tennessee that I (and many others) find objectionable and kind of jealous and petty.
The "Kentucky Bourbon" cultural phenomenon arose organically. It became known in the 1800's that if you wanted some of the good stuff, you'd get the whiskey with the "Bourbon County" tax stamps on it. Bourbon slowly became a national treasure, and eventually, Congress put forth laws protecting and regulating the production and labeling of bourbon.
Sometime much more recently in history, Tennessee distillers started marketing their whiskey as "Tennessee Whiskey" with the Lincoln County process being what set Tennessee whiskey apart from other whiskeys. Unlike bourbon, Tennessee Whiskey was never a part of the public consciousness until it started being intentionally marketed that way in the mid 1900s. The Tennessee distillers and politicians lobbied Congress to protect their Tennessee Whiskey in the same manner that they protected bourbon. However, Congress has always declined to give Tennessee Whiskey the same recognition that they give bourbon, and that's really the core issue.
The Tennessee politicians basically stamped their feet, gathered up their marbles, and headed home where they passed state laws about Tennessee whiskey, with one of those laws being that it MUST be distilled in Tennessee to be sold in their state as "Tennessee Whiskey", not that any other distillers have ever tried to market "Tennessee whiskey" distilled outside of Tennessee. Meanwhile, the state of Kentucky has done no such thing with bourbon, and bourbon can be made anywhere in the U.S. according to federal law.
My point about the LCP itself is that it did originally start, as another forum member mentioned, as a way to take the rough edges off of "white dog" whiskey back in the day. Of course it is less of an issue now that all the distillers are aging their whiskey for years in charred oak barrels. There are some bourbon drinkers (and distilling experts as well) who think that the Lincoln county process does somewhat hinder the aging potential of the whiskey. Of course the expert distillers at the Tennessee distilleries disagree. It's really just a matter of preference, and the controversy surrounding the entire process has much more to do with the politics of the situation than with the process itself.