I also heard today that they will be closing their doors. That stinks!
Well according to the FDA, when they "reviewed" the cost benefits of the deeming regulations they actually didn't review any cost benefits, and just stated that these tobacco shops could just fill their shelves with "non-tobacco" products which would allow them to stay in business. Unbelievable!!! If they were selling non-tobacco products then they wouldn't be a tobacco shop anymore, and who goes to a tobacco shop for anything other than tobacco related products. Wow... gotta love the logic here. I know there are some specialty shops that sell both antiques, specialty items as well as pipes/cigars etc., but you just don't turn a tobacco shop into a specialty shop overnight and expect to maintain the same level of business.
With the upcoming lawsuit filed by the IPCPR, CAA and CRA; one of the line items in the lawsuits claims that the FDA failed to perform a cost benefit analysis which was required of them before introducing the deeming regulations. There statement as I mentioned above shows the lack of effort and carelessness of their actions which I hope the courts will also see and help get these deeming regulations overturned. If my information is correct arguments for the case begin July 28, 2017.