Have you any pipe(s) in your collection you find disappointing or plain irritating to look at ?
I bought this Peterson XL90 new a few years ago
I accepted that it wouldn’t pass a cleaner - so that is NOT a deal breaker
I have kept it in a cupboard all this time.
Because of a large rotation, it has been smoked only a few times
Despite that, the stem oxidises if you so much as look at it.
And the silver band constantly needs shining.
I tried using toothpaste (the least abrasive agent I could think of) to remove the stem oxidation. Only to result in several micro-pits.
Obviously very poor quality vulcanite was used.
But worse of all, and this causes me no end of angst, is the sloppy stem work.
There is not a smooth gradation and transition in the taper.
It looks like someone with a thunder thighs and skinny calf and ankles - most unpleasing to the eye.
I do like my pipes to double up as eye candy
It looks like someone’s effort after an extended lunch at the pub
It’s fine as a smoker, but it’s definitely not a looker
Lest anyone thinks this is another Peterson bashing thread, I have several Pete’s, and this is the only one I’m unhappy with.
I bought this Peterson XL90 new a few years ago
I accepted that it wouldn’t pass a cleaner - so that is NOT a deal breaker
I have kept it in a cupboard all this time.
Because of a large rotation, it has been smoked only a few times
Despite that, the stem oxidises if you so much as look at it.
And the silver band constantly needs shining.
I tried using toothpaste (the least abrasive agent I could think of) to remove the stem oxidation. Only to result in several micro-pits.
Obviously very poor quality vulcanite was used.
But worse of all, and this causes me no end of angst, is the sloppy stem work.
There is not a smooth gradation and transition in the taper.
It looks like someone with a thunder thighs and skinny calf and ankles - most unpleasing to the eye.
I do like my pipes to double up as eye candy
It looks like someone’s effort after an extended lunch at the pub
It’s fine as a smoker, but it’s definitely not a looker
Lest anyone thinks this is another Peterson bashing thread, I have several Pete’s, and this is the only one I’m unhappy with.